Personally I've been seeing my freinds going to MeWe and Parler because they want to keep the social updates coming in
Dumas Walker wrote to MOONDOG <=-
Personally I've been seeing my freinds going to MeWe and Parler because they want to keep the social updates coming in
A friend of mine got me to open an account on Parler but so far I
have not really got the hang of it. Best as I can tell, it is a
cross between Twitter (which I never used) and FB?
Dumas Walker wrote to MOONDOG <=-
A friend of mine got me to open an account on Parler but so far I have
not really got the hang of it. Best as I can tell, it is a cross
between Twitter (which I never used) and FB?
Parler is closer to Twitter. MeWe is like Facebook. Rumble is like YouTube. >All without the censorship - for now. We'll see what happens after Soros buys >them (like Fox news).
Dumas Walker wrote to DR. WHAT <=-
Did Soros really buy Fox news?
Which Synchronet interface are you referring to? I'm not being defensive, I' just curious, because Synchronet is a bit of a chameleon to remote (terminal users and could likely impersonate Citidal/UX or any other BBS interface you find more easy to understand. Synchronet installs come with several command shells that are either greatly simplified (and "easy") or emulate other popu BBS programs of the 1990s.
As far as I have heard, it is the true inheritor of the original Citadel codebase, which got opensourced at some point.
The current iteration has a web frond end you can install separately, but th core is, at its heart, a very minimalistic BBS. It is cool because you can t enable IMAP and other services on top of it, which I think makes for a great groupware for small orgs.
Did Soros really buy Fox news?
That's what it looks like.
There was an interview recently that they did. When the interviewee brought up issues with Soros, they chopped the interview.
Dumas Walker wrote to DR. WHAT <=-
That is the theory, but I have not seen any actual evidence that the Murdoch family has sold it. I know that interview chop happened,
though.
Dr. What wrote to Dumas Walker <=-
Dumas Walker wrote to DR. WHAT <=-
That is the theory, but I have not seen any actual evidence that the Murdoch family has sold it. I know that interview chop happened,
though.
And you are correct about that. It's theory.
But we do have tweets by the Murdoch's wife that indicates Fox is just
as anti-Trump as the rest of the Media. At the very least, we know
that Fox is **not** a reliable source of news.
Dennisk wrote to Dr. What <=-
Tucker Carlson would be the only reason I would watch Fox News.
Dennisk wrote to Dr. What <=-
Tucker Carlson would be the only reason I would watch Fox News.
The only reason I'd watch Tucker Carlson is to remember him inviting
Jon Stewart on Crossfire and being thoroughly humiliated.
Dennisk wrote to Dr. What <=-
Any "mainstream news" is **not** reliable. The News Media is just
there to support the establishment, AKA The Cathedral.
Tucker Carlson would be the only reason I would watch Fox News.
Any "mainstream news" is **not** reliable. The News Media is just there
to support the establishment, AKA The Cathedral.
Tucker Carlson would be the only reason I would watch Fox News.
Dennisk wrote to Dr. What <=-
Any "mainstream news" is **not** reliable. The News Media is just there to support the establishment, AKA The Cathedral.
Which is one of the big reasons my TV's pretty much been off since March. I used to watch local news, but the propaganda
level got too high.
Tucker Carlson would be the only reason I would watch Fox News.
With the issues at Fox news, I fully expect Tucker to move to Newmax or OANN soon.
Re: Re: Parler
By: Dennisk to Dr. What on Sun Nov 08 2020 00:47:00
Any "mainstream news" is **not** reliable. The News Media is just there to support the establishment, AKA The Cathedral.
Tucker Carlson would be the only reason I would watch Fox News.
Bingo. I don't know who the hell Tucker Carlson is... Just because I try to make sure, as a general life goal, that I remain completely unfamiliar with _anything_ having to do with the primary propaganda outlets; I'm curious as to why you think Tucker Carlson is worth watching, though...
2.7 billion people use facebook.
the proof is in the pudding.
Do 2.7 billion people communicate meaningfully on FB, or does it just have 2.6 billion which scroll through feeds idly?
Doesn't Donald Trump want to start his own channel? I would expect that Tucker would be asked to join.
Lupine Furmen wrote to Dennisk <=-
Re: Re: Before Bandwidth / Af
By: Dennisk to MRO on Tue Nov 17 2020 21:43:00
2.7 billion people use facebook.
the proof is in the pudding.
Do 2.7 billion people communicate meaningfully on FB, or does it just have 2.6 billion which scroll through feeds idly?
FaceBook is the largest spyware platform out there, second only to Windows. It tracks every move you make on the net, not just what you do
on their site.
Something you do NOT have to worry about with BBS'.
-+-
Tucker speaks his mind, and seems to not care too much about towing the line. I wonder how he remains employed sometimes.
Tucker Carlson both rails against the far Left, but also big business and the war machine. He seems not to be too partisan, and not too concerned about being on the right side of the establishment.
FaceBook is the largest spyware platform out there, second only to Windows. tracks every move you make on the net, not just what you do on their site.
Something you do NOT have to worry about with BBS'.
Sprite wrote to Dennisk <=-
Re: news vs propaganda
By: Dennisk to Sprite on Mon Nov 23 2020 06:30:37
Tucker speaks his mind, and seems to not care too much about towing the line. I wonder how he remains employed sometimes.
I'll have to check this fellow out. I'll have to admit, though, I'm
a bit biased against this fellow from the start. I'll try to give him
a fair shot, though. You just don't get anywhere on those networks without knowing whose ass to kiss and how to appropriately insert the tongue, if you catch my drift. I'm willing to bet that some
individuals go in there with a whole fully fledged character
development outline ready to go. A bit like a character in WWF/WWE/whatever the hell it is now. Maybe this guy is just in his 'early' stages, still picking it up as a newb in the network, not yet having seen 'the light' of whichever side (gee I wonder) he's going to
end up taking in the future, as his character develops.
BTW: You don't tow a line, you toe it. Or the drill sergeants fuck
you up. :)
Tucker Carlson both rails against the far Left, but also big business and the war machine. He seems not to be too partisan, and not too concerned about being on the right side of the establishment.
I would think that 'both' would indicate that far left + (big business/the war machine) are in some sort of dichotomy. What you're saying is that he's a bit on the right, and rails against big
business/war machine. I guess those maybe are some light saving graces compared to the 'hardcore right-wing republican' core type that we have around where I'm at. Heh. Anyway there's not really a dichotomy in
those terms, just sounds like he's a bit more moderate. It's not like
Fox went and put a liberal on the air. I would imagine, especially at this point in the game, that they're also trying to pander a bit to a political climate which has shifted fairly hard (by the numbers, not
the individuals, I mean) against the right recently...
And here I swore I wasn't going to get pulled into politics today.
You think Windows is worse than Facebook?
Think so?? We all know what you're doing dude. ;-)
Lupine Furmen wrote to Dennisk <=-
Re: FB (was: Before Bandwidth
By: Dennisk to Lupine Furmen on Tue Nov 24 2020 21:40:00
You think Windows is worse than Facebook?
Windows 10, you better believe it.
-+-
Actually, On Syncronet 'R' is Re-read the message, and 'A' is Reply. So in that respect Mystic is more logical with 'R' for Reply and 'A' for Read 'A'gain.
And in Synchronet those 2 reading-posts commands are easily reversed if that's
what you're used to.
Actually, On Syncronet 'R' is Re-read the message, and 'A' is Reply. So in that respect Mystic is more logical with 'R' for Reply and 'A' for Read 'A'gain.
And in Synchronet those 2 reading-posts commands are easily reversed if that's
what you're used to.
I have changed main menu commands easily enough. Where does one find the place to change the message menu commands?
| Sysop: | Gate Keeper |
|---|---|
| Location: | Shelby, NC |
| Users: | 719 |
| Nodes: | 20 (0 / 20) |
| Uptime: | 114:12:40 |
| Calls: | 9,260 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 5,288 |
| Messages: | 466,734 |