Actually, I made a very narrow painting showing only a few examples that >DS>came to mind. Those who have lived the black life in America could make >DS>a listing that goes on for hundreds of lines.
One question:
Are *you* black? Straight `yes' or `no'.
NO. Are you a person of color?
Yeah I am; I'm white!
BTW......there are so many great examples of people who
are or were black, growing up in the face of poor beginnings, who succeeded
in their lives to a huge extent. Herman Cain is just one.
There are many others. And a lot of them are highly successful and extremely
wealthy.
Hussein Obama; who couldn't even speak in honor of a great American's
funreal without turning it into a political circus by bad mouthing the present administration; is filthy rich, owns an estate on Martha's
Vineyard.
Of course, being a particularly odious hunk of dog dirt, his diatribe of >leftie tripe came as no surprise. However....I wonder how much the family of >the deceased man he was there to eulogize appreciated the sorry son of a
bitch turning such a solemn moment into a democrat three ring circus? It
was almost as bad as what the leftie filth did at Paul Wellstone's funeral.
Democrats don't just suck eggs....they're filth!
Have to go find a good tagline.....back in a flash.....
"Joe Biden; After 48 years he's still running on his promises; none of
which have ever been kept!"
If people get arrested or shot at a traffic stop, it's their own dam >GD>fault.
Bull crap.
Trayvon was not gunned down in cold blood as you have suggested, as it >GD>turned out he was up to no good, he died because he tried to take the >GD>gun from Zimmerman.
He tried to protect himself after he was accosted and threatened.
That is a bald-faced lie! You know the same as everyone else knows the kid >jumped out of some bushes a attacked Zimmerman. He was holding Zimmermen
down
while pounding him in the face. He got shot assaulting someone he should
have
left alone.
Your attempt to twist the truth is typical of you.
Hello Tim,
If people get arrested or shot at a traffic stop, it's their own dam >GD>fault.
Bull crap.
Trayvon was not gunned down in cold blood as you have suggested, as it >GD>turned out he was up to no good, he died because he tried to take the >GD>gun from Zimmerman.
He tried to protect himself after he was accosted and threatened.
That is a bald-faced lie! You know the same as everyone else knows the ki >jumped out of some bushes a attacked Zimmerman. He was holding Zimmermen
down
while pounding him in the face. He got shot assaulting someone he should
have
left alone.
Lemme see if I got this right.
White guy pulls a gun on black kid.
Black kid tries to run away.
White guy shoots black kid dead.
Did I get that right?
Your attempt to twist the truth is typical of you.
The truth? You can't handle the truth! Jack Nicholson said it first.
When he was in the Army, trying to instruct a student ...
Lemme see if I got this right.
White guy pulls a gun on black kid.
Black kid tries to run away.
White guy shoots black kid dead.
Did I get that right?
Your attempt to twist the truth is typical of you.The truth? You can't handle the truth! Jack Nicholson said it first. >LL>When he was in the Army, trying to instruct a student ...
and Jack it say it again directly to you at the same volume and awesome >acting ability that everyone is aware of.
I'll it again just in case you missed the first time
George Zimmerman was acquitted.
You can harp on this all you wish with your folly of useless points, but
it's not going to prove the narrative or point.
We already know where this phony outrage is coming from.
it's familiar because it is this is seen nightly as the light from the TV
fills the living rooms with what is really going on, which proves our
point.
Lemme see if I got this right.
White guy pulls a gun on black kid.
Black kid tries to run away.
White guy shoots black kid dead.
Did I get that right?
Your attempt to twist the truth is typical of you.The truth? You can't handle the truth! Jack Nicholson said it first. >LL>When he was in the Army, trying to instruct a student ...
and Jack it say it again directly to you at the same volume and awesome >acting ability that everyone is aware of.
I'll it again just in case you missed the first time
George Zimmerman was acquitted.
You can harp on this all you wish with your folly of useless points, but
it's not going to prove the narrative or point.
We already know where this phony outrage is coming from.
it's familiar because it is this is seen nightly as the light from the TV
fills the living rooms with what is really going on, which proves our
point.
When white guy murders black kid in cold blood, everyone should
be outraged.
On 08-03-20 08:27, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Lee Lofaso about Re: Floyd <=-
Here are the facts for you and the rest of your lefty friends.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/585152/people-shot-to- death-by-us-police-by
-race/
Rayshard Brooks would still be alive today if he did resist arrest.
Don't take my word for it watch the video how this started and how it ended
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhdpG2XzRXQ&t=183s
the struggle with the Police. Then within some distance from the cops
as he was running away, Rayshard pointed the tazer at the cops (as he triggered the tazer.
it made it a flash) it was at this point the one of the cops fired his
gun killing Rayshard Brooks.
On 08-03-20 08:27, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Lee Lofaso about Re: Floyd <=-
Here are the facts for you and the rest of your lefty friends.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/585152/people-shot-to- death-by-us-police-by
-race/
Did you actually look at that article with understanding? Possibly not since you seemed to miss the point that a higher proportion of blacks
are shot by police than whites.
[quote]
Additionally, the rate of fatal police shootings among Black Americans
was much higher than that for any other ethnicity, standing at 31 fatal shootings per million of the population as of July 2020.
[/quote]
Rayshard Brooks would still be alive today if he did resist arrest. Don't take my word for it watch the video how this started and how it ended
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhdpG2XzRXQ&t=183s
Except that the end of that 44 minute video does not show how it ended.
It shows a lot of discussion. It shows the officer administering a
field sobriety test (which Brooks passed much better than I could at any time). Then it showed the officer putting cuffs on Brooks without any real explanation. A shuffle ensued and Brooks ran away (not the best choice I admit). From then on, we only hear sounds. Did you watch the video? If you had, you could not have truthfully said it showed the
end.
Other videos show that the officer shot Brooks in the back as he was running away. Brooks was no threat to the officer or anyone -- which is the critera for using deadly force.
Wrong. The cop fired while Brooks was running away -- shot in the back.
On 08-04-20 13:33, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Floyd <=-
Did you actually look at that article with understanding? Possibly not since you seemed to miss the point that a higher proportion of blacks
are shot by police than whites.
Here are the Actual Numbers
1441 more whites died then 778 black in last 4 years
[quote]
Additionally, the rate of fatal police shootings among Black Americans
was much higher than that for any other ethnicity, standing at 31 fatal shootings per million of the population as of July 2020.
[/quote]
Here is the full quote
Sadly, the trend of fatal police shootings in the United States seems
to only be increasing, with a total 558 civilians having been shot, 111
of whom were Black, as of July 29, 2020. In 2018, there were 996 fatal police shootings, and
in 2019 this figure increased to 1,004. Additionally, the rate of
fatal police shootings among Black Americans was much higher than that
for any other ethnicity, standing at 31 fatal shootings per million of
the population as of July 2020.
Let's take a deeper dive, shall we? with what the above text is
indicating here. 558 civilians having been shot 111 of whom were black this means that 447 of these were of another race. That number of skyrocketed to 1004, the graphic does NOT say it was by by Police officers,
In recent years, particularly since the fatal shooting of Michael
Brown in Ferguson, Missouri in 2014, police brutality has become a hot button issue in the United States. The number of homicides committed by police in the United States is often compared to those in countries
such as England, where the number is significantly lower.
Black Lives Matter
The Black Lives Matter Movement, formed in 2013, has been a vocal part
of the movement against police brutality in the U.S. by organizing "die-ins", marches, and demonstrations in response to the killings of black men and women by police.
Black Lives Matter is a farce.
Rayshard Brooks would still be alive today if he did resist arrest.
Don't take my word for it watch the video how
this started and how it
ended
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhdpG2XzRXQ&t=183s
Except that the end of that 44 minute video does not show how it ended.
It shows a lot of discussion. It shows the officer administering a
field sobriety test (which Brooks passed much better than I could at any time). Then it showed the officer putting cuffs on Brooks without any real explanation. A shuffle ensued and Brooks ran away (not the best choice I admit). From then on, we only hear sounds. Did you watch the video? If you had, you could not have truthfully said it showed the
end.
You are right about the discussion just about 42 minutes worth. You
really believe that you or I would be given 42 minutes of time to try
to explain ourselves?
Other videos show that the officer shot Brooks in the back as he was running away. Brooks was no threat to the officer or anyone -- which is the critera for using deadly force.
This video that I posted was from a Police Body cam, what other video would you be referencing.
Wrong. The cop fired while Brooks was running away -- shot in the back.
No you're wrong. COPS do not shoot at suspects white or black just for fleeing the scene.
At 41:35 you can hear the cop telling Rayshard to let go of the tazer.
1441 more whites died then 778 black in last 4 years
Not the point.
Duh -- the quote is explicit that it about shootings of blacks by police officers -- why are you trying to muddy the water?
In recent years, particularly since the fatal shooting of MichaelBrown in Ferguson, Missouri in 2014, police brutality has become a hot button issue in the United States. The number of homicides committed b police in the United States is often compared to those in countries such as England, where the number is significantly lower.
With good reason, perhaps because England has stricter gun control laws. Also due to the fact that most British police do not even carry guns -- they don't feed the need to do so.
<<SNIP OF VERBAGE THAT IS NON RESPONSIVE TO THE QUESTION>>
In other words, you did not see what you claimed to see about how he got shot. And no, I think that you or me would have been told after about
five minutes -- OK, walk over to your daughter's birthday and leave your car parked here where it is safe and causing no problem.
On 08-05-20 10:55, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Floyd <=-
1441 more whites died then 778 black in last 4 years
Not the point.
It is the point because of BLM they continie to get it very wrong they have been indicating this misinformation about the topic, they often
say that more blacks are killed than whites, that is NOT the truth.
Duh -- the quote is explicit that it about shootings of blacks by police officers -- why are you trying to muddy the water?
Nope just the facts Dale and those facts prove that more whites are
killed by police, not the vise versa. Which shoots (sorry for the pun) holes in this narrative that more blacks are killed then whites.
What about Chicago? They have the strictest gun laws in the U.S. Yet people are still killing each other by the many hundreds every weekend
on the Southside of Chicago.
With good reason, perhaps because England has stricter gun control laws. Also due to the fact that most British police do not even carry guns -- they don't feed the need to do so.
Then someone with a gun means w/ bad intentions will slaughter the
copper in England .
There is another video that I have seen that shows exactly what I previously stated that Brooks fired the tazer as he was running away
from cops.
Here ya go
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5QEnGkIbzA
Says a lot.
Firing a taser "IS" a deadly weapon according the District Attorney of Georgia as was found to be the case when different cops used a taser on
The video also explains why Brooks ran, he had a criminal record and
if arrested would of been jailed.
On 08-05-20 10:55, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Floyd <=-
1441 more whites died then 778 black in last 4 years
Not the point.
It is the point because of BLM they continie to get it very wrong the have been indicating this misinformation about the topic, they often say that more blacks are killed than whites, that is NOT the truth.
The point was and is that blacks are killed by police at a higher rate than whites. Stop trying to deflect to other arguements if you cannot address that point.
It depends. If it were always a deadly weapon, then why bother using it instead of a gun? It is only a deadly weapon in some situations -- and this was not one of them.Because Dale. Brooks ... did ... have ... a ... gun ...
The video also explains why Brooks ran, he had a criminal record and if arrested would of been jailed.
I did not see or hear that in the video -- show me the time spot where
it occured.
Nor does it explain why running was justification for using deadly
force, especially when the police had all the information they might
need to apprehend Brooks later on.
I did not see or hear that in the video -- show me the time spot where
it occured.
On 08-07-20 13:24, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Floyd <=-
The point was and is that blacks are killed by police at a higher rate than whites. Stop trying to deflect to other arguments if you cannot address that point.
I am deflecting anything but did provide the actual facts that prove
that 1. I am not deflecting
2. I have proven that your statement is inaccurate.
It depends. If it were always a deadly weapon, then why bother using it instead of a gun? It is only a deadly weapon in some situations -- and this was not one of them.
Because Dale. Brooks ... did ... have ... a ... gun ...
There is no area of confusion or no ability to twist either, when it
fits your narrative. You can't have it both way when it suits you.
The District Attorney ruled that the use of a taser "IS" a deadly
weapon.
I did not see or hear that in the video -- show me the time spot where
it occurred.
Again the video can be found at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5QEnGkIbzA
1:34 and then from there it shows in detail what those charges were.
Really? That is not in any of the reporting. Enlighten us all as to
your evidence that he had a gun during the incident that led to his
being shot in the back.
OK since it was not on the video in question, you dug up some other
video by a youtube blogger. I'm sure that if one searches enough they
can come up with some source to say anything they want to say. In any case, looking at time 3:12 the blogger goes on to claim that the DA has declared that a taser is a deadly weapon. He presents a chart from the
GA code that he claims supports his statement. However, it explicitly outlines conditions under which an object might result in a charge of aggravated assault. That article doe not mention a taser, and for the case in question the taser as discharged by Brooks does not fit the definition in the statue. It was not discharged in a manner that did or could result in serious bodily harm.
On 08-07-20 13:24, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Floyd <=-
It depends. If it were always a deadly weapon, then why bother using it instead of a gun? It is only a deadly weapon in some situations -- and this was not one of them.
Because Dale. Brooks ... did ... have ... a ... gun ...
Really? That is not in any of the reporting. Enlighten us all as to DS>your evidence that he had a gun during the incident that led to his
being shot in the back.
There is no area of confusion or no ability to twist either, when it
fits your narrative. You can't have it both way when it suits you.
The District Attorney ruled that the use of a taser "IS" a deadly
weapon.
Quote the ruling. When is a taser a deadly weapon?
I do not believe
that it can be considered as such when discharged randomly in the air DS>from a considerable distance. Site the ruling that shows I am wrong.
I did not see or hear that in the video -- show me the time spot where
it occurred.
Again the video can be found at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5QEnGkIbzA
1:34 and then from there it shows in detail what those charges were.
OK since it was not on the video in question, you dug up some other
video by a youtube blogger. I'm sure that if one searches enough they DS>can come up with some source to say anything they want to say. In any DS>case, looking at time 3:12 the blogger goes on to claim that the DA has DS>declared that a taser is a deadly weapon. He presents a chart from the DS>GA code that he claims supports his statement. However, it explicitly DS>outlines conditions under which an object might result in a charge of DS>aggravated assault. That article doe not mention a taser, and for the DS>case in question the taser as discharged by Brooks does not fit the DS>definition in the statue. It was not discharged in a manner that did or DS>could result in serious bodily harm.
Try again if you can come up with a credible source.
| Sysop: | Gate Keeper |
|---|---|
| Location: | Shelby, NC |
| Users: | 719 |
| Nodes: | 20 (0 / 20) |
| Uptime: | 05:23:35 |
| Calls: | 9,319 |
| Files: | 5,288 |
| D/L today: |
3 files (128K bytes) |
| Messages: | 468,476 |