LinuxNet is Back
+--------------------------------------------------------+
|Current infopack for LinuxNet FTN Network. |
|WHQ BBS: bbs.thebytexchange.com | Includes apps and |
|files to get connected to LinuxNet. |
+--------------------------------------------------------+
World Headquearters (WHQ) BBS: ---------------------------------------------
Telnet: bbs.thebytexchangebbs.com Port: 23
FTP : ftp://ftp.thebytexchange.com Port: 21
Binkp: bbs.thebytexchangebbs.com Port:24554 MD5:On
Online (Preferred Method!):
We have an online APP located on The ByteXchange BBS, Main Menu. Option 1. Fill out the form completely.
This will generate your application and send it for processing. This is the fastest way.
World Headquearters (WHQ) BBS: ---------------------------------------------
Telnet: bbs.thebytexchangebbs.com Port: 23
Last update of whois database: 2023-12-06T02:16:32Z <<<
World Headquearters (WHQ) BBS:
---------------------------------------------
Telnet: bbs.thebytexchangebbs.com Port: 23
* Forwarded from area 'OTHERNETS'
Re: LinuxNet
By: Rick Smith to All on Tue Dec 05 2023 07:21 am
LinuxNet is Back
+--------------------------------------------------------+
|Current infopack for LinuxNet FTN Network. |
|WHQ BBS: bbs.thebytexchange.com | Includes apps and |
|files to get connected to LinuxNet. |
+--------------------------------------------------------+
World Headquearters (WHQ) BBS:
---------------------------------------------
Telnet: bbs.thebytexchangebbs.com Port: 23
FTP : ftp://ftp.thebytexchange.com Port: 21
Binkp: bbs.thebytexchangebbs.com Port:24554 MD5:On
Online (Preferred Method!):
We have an online APP located on The ByteXchange BBS, Main Menu.
Option 1. Fill out the form completely. This will generate your
application and send it for processing. This is the fastest way.
Logged in to the BBS. Do not see an infopack available to download.
Tried to list the message areas as indicated on a menu, but it did nothing. Don't really want to complete an online application until I
can see more about the network. Can you put a "backbone.na" type file
and the application up for download?
* Forwarded from area 'OTHERNETS'
Re: LinuxNet
By: Rick Smith to All on Tue Dec 05 2023 07:21 am
World Headquearters (WHQ) BBS:
---------------------------------------------
Telnet: bbs.thebytexchangebbs.com Port: 23
deon:$ host bbs.thebytexchangebbs.com
Host bbs.thebytexchangebbs.com not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
deon:$ whois thebytexchangebbs.com
# whois.verisign-grs.com
No match for domain "THEBYTEXCHANGEBBS.COM".
Last update of whois database: 2023-12-06T02:16:32Z <<<
Rick Smith wrote to Dan Clough <=-
Hello Dan!
Answering a msg of <Tuesday December 05 2023>, from you to me:
No match for domain "THEBYTEXCHANGEBBS.COM".
Last update of whois database: 2023-12-06T02:16:32Z <<<
Yeah I thought he was ready sorry about that..... I am working on it..
deon:$ host bbs.thebytexchangebbs.com
Host bbs.thebytexchangebbs.com not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
* Forwarded from area 'OTHERNETS'
Re: LinuxNet
By: Rick Smith to deon on Wed Dec 06 2023 07:20 am
No match for domain "THEBYTEXCHANGEBBS.COM".
Last update of whois database: 2023-12-06T02:16:32Z <<<
Yeah I thought he was ready sorry about that..... I am working on
it..
No biggie, just wanted to make you aware - in case there was a
mistake.
I think the "bbs" part of the domain name shouldnt be there?
ie: just thebytexchange.com
No match for domain "THEBYTEXCHANGEBBS.COM".
Last update of whois database: 2023-12-06T02:16:32Z <<<
I am trying to find a subtle keystroke error becaus I can get it ping, and show registry etc... Which is odd because I critically looked at what you type and it seems accurate
LinuxNet is BackLet me know when you have all the kinks ironed out and I'll sign up.
+--------------------------------------------------------+
¦Current infopack for LinuxNet FTN Network. ¦
¦WHQ BBS: bbs.thebytexchange.com | Includes apps and ¦
¦files to get connected to LinuxNet. ¦
+--------------------------------------------------------+
World Headquearters (WHQ) BBS:
---------------------------------------------
Telnet: bbs.thebytexchangebbs.com Port: 23
FTP : ftp://ftp.thebytexchange.com Port: 21
Binkp: bbs.thebytexchangebbs.com Port:24554 MD5:On
Online (Preferred Method!):
We have an online APP located on The ByteXchange BBS, Main Menu.
Option 1. Fill out the form completely. This will generate your
application and send it for processing. This is the fastest way.
... Recipes..The bumper stickers of BBSing
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20220504
* Origin: Awesome Net- Oregon FTN Hub - www.awesomenet.us (1:105/81)
* Forwarded from area 'OTHERNETS'
On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 07:21:00 -0800
"Rick Smith" (1:105/81) <Rick.Smith@f81.n105.z1.fidonet> wrote:
LinuxNet is BackLet me know when you have all the kinks ironed out and I'll sign up.
+--------------------------------------------------------+
¦Current infopack for LinuxNet FTN Network. ¦
¦WHQ BBS: bbs.thebytexchange.com | Includes apps and ¦
¦files to get connected to LinuxNet. ¦
+--------------------------------------------------------+
World Headquearters (WHQ) BBS:
---------------------------------------------
Telnet: bbs.thebytexchangebbs.com Port: 23
FTP : ftp://ftp.thebytexchange.com Port: 21
Binkp: bbs.thebytexchangebbs.com Port:24554 MD5:On
Online (Preferred Method!):
We have an online APP located on The ByteXchange BBS, Main Menu.
Option 1. Fill out the form completely. This will generate your
application and send it for processing. This is the fastest way.
... Recipes..The bumper stickers of BBSing
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20220504
* Origin: Awesome Net- Oregon FTN Hub - www.awesomenet.us
(1:105/81)
--
End Of The Line BBS - Plano, TX
telnet endofthelinebbs.com 23
LinuxNet is Back
+--------------------------------------------------------+
|Current infopack for LinuxNet FTN Network. |
|WHQ BBS: bbs.thebytexchange.com | Includes apps and |
|files to get connected to LinuxNet. |
+--------------------------------------------------------+
World Headquearters (WHQ) BBS:
---------------------------------------------
Telnet: bbs.thebytexchangebbs.com Port: 23
FTP : ftp://ftp.thebytexchange.com Port: 21
Binkp: bbs.thebytexchangebbs.com Port:24554 MD5:On
Online (Preferred Method!):
We have an online APP located on The ByteXchange BBS, Main Menu.
Option 1. Fill out the form completely. This will generate your
application and send it for processing. This is the fastest way.
Let me know when you have all the kinks ironed out and I'll sign up.
I believe we are up, nodelists being produced each week all traffic routing as it should... Good to go.
Hello Nigel!Seems people have been having trouble connecting to the right server
Friday December 15 2023 00:26, you wrote to me:
* Forwarded from area 'OTHERNETS'
On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 07:21:00 -0800
"Rick Smith" (1:105/81) <Rick.Smith@f81.n105.z1.fidonet> wrote:
LinuxNet is BackLet me know when you have all the kinks ironed out and I'll sign
+--------------------------------------------------------+
¦Current infopack for LinuxNet FTN Network. ¦
¦WHQ BBS: bbs.thebytexchange.com | Includes apps and ¦
¦files to get connected to LinuxNet. ¦
+--------------------------------------------------------+
World Headquearters (WHQ) BBS:
---------------------------------------------
Telnet: bbs.thebytexchangebbs.com Port: 23
FTP : ftp://ftp.thebytexchange.com Port: 21
Binkp: bbs.thebytexchangebbs.com Port:24554 MD5:On
Online (Preferred Method!):
We have an online APP located on The ByteXchange BBS, Main Menu.
Option 1. Fill out the form completely. This will generate your
application and send it for processing. This is the fastest way.
... Recipes..The bumper stickers of BBSing
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20220504
* Origin: Awesome Net- Oregon FTN Hub - www.awesomenet.us
(1:105/81)
up. --
End Of The Line BBS - Plano, TX
telnet endofthelinebbs.com 23
I believe we are up, nodelists being produced each week all traffic
routing as it should... Good to go.
Regards,
Rick
... Taglines are the Rest Room walls of BBSing!
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20220504
* Origin: Awesome Net- Oregon FTN Hub - www.awesomenet.us (1:105/81)
* Forwarded from area 'OTHERNETS'
Re: LinuxNet
By: Rick Smith to Nigel Reed on Fri Dec 15 2023 06:05 am
Menu.LinuxNet is Back
+--------------------------------------------------------+
|Current infopack for LinuxNet FTN Network. |
|WHQ BBS: bbs.thebytexchange.com | Includes apps and |
|files to get connected to LinuxNet. |
+--------------------------------------------------------+
World Headquearters (WHQ) BBS:
---------------------------------------------
Telnet: bbs.thebytexchangebbs.com Port: 23
FTP : ftp://ftp.thebytexchange.com Port: 21
Binkp: bbs.thebytexchangebbs.com Port:24554 MD5:On
Online (Preferred Method!):
We have an online APP located on The ByteXchange BBS, Main
way.Option 1. Fill out the form completely. This will generate your
application and send it for processing. This is the fastest
Let me know when you have all the kinks ironed out and I'llsign up.
I believe we are up, nodelists being produced each week all traffic
routing as it should... Good to go.
This has not been my experience with this new net. I got a node
number assigned fairly quickly, but no nodelist or traffic. Please re-check...
Rick Smith wrote to Dan Clough <=-
I believe we are up, nodelists being produced each week all traffic
routing as it should... Good to go.
This has not been my experience with this new net. I got a node
number assigned fairly quickly, but no nodelist or traffic. Please re-check...
What is your node?
What is your node?
It is 110:211/1
* Forwarded from area 'OTHERNETS'
Rick Smith wrote to Dan Clough <=-
I believe we are up, nodelists being produced each week all
traffic routing as it should... Good to go.
This has not been my experience with this new net. I got a node
number assigned fairly quickly, but no nodelist or traffic.
Please re-check...
What is your node?
It is 110:211/1
... Gone crazy, be back later, please leave message.
=== MultiMail/Linux v0.52
Rick Smith wrote to Dan Clough <=-
I believe we are up, nodelists being produced each week all
traffic routing as it should... Good to go.
This has not been my experience with this new net. I got a node
number assigned fairly quickly, but no nodelist or traffic.
Please re-check...
What is your node?
It is 110:211/1
I believe they are working on it now, you are going to be in new nodelist... What BBS or FTN software are you using?
Andrew Leary wrote to Dan Clough <=-
It is 110:211/1
Our connection is up; I have been told by Chad that the nodelist
will be updated today.
Hello deon!
06 Dec 23 13:16, you wrote to Rick Smith:
World Headquearters (WHQ) BBS:
---------------------------------------------
Telnet: bbs.thebytexchangebbs.com Port: 23
The correct address is bbs.thebytexchange.com.
Andrew
World Headquearters (WHQ) BBS:
---------------------------------------------
Telnet: bbs.thebytexchangebbs.com Port: 23
The correct address is bbs.thebytexchange.com.
Andrew
Hello Andrew,
Can you advise on the current state of LinuxNet? Is it still a viable network these days? Thanks.
Hello Andrew,
Can you advise on the current state of LinuxNet? Is it still a viable network these days? Thanks.
Andrew? You there?
Andrew Leary wrote to Dan Clough <=-
Hello Andrew,
Can you advise on the current state of LinuxNet? Is it still a viable network these days? Thanks.
LinuxNet is still operating, barely. I can't get a response from Chad most of the time, although his system is still running and accepting
mail. I am still producing the distributed LinuxNet nodelists,
although I have no confirmation that they are actually making it out to Chad's downlinks.
All in all, I'm starting to think that there's not much reason to
continue it. Perhaps the FidoNet LINUX echo would be a more realistic place to discuss anything related to Linux.
All in all, I'm starting to think that there's not much reason to continue it. Perhaps the FidoNet LINUX echo would be a more realistic place to discuss anything related to Linux.
Andrew Leary wrote to Dan Clough <=-
Dan Clough wrote to Andrew Leary:
Hello Andrew,
Can you advise on the current state of LinuxNet? Is it still a
viable
network these days? Thanks.
Andrew? You there?
LinuxNet is still operating, barely. I can't get a response from Chad most of the time, although his system is still running and accepting
mail. I am still producing the distributed LinuxNet nodelists, although
I have no confirmation that they are actually making it out to Chad's downlinks.
All in all, I'm starting to think that there's not much reason to
continue it. Perhaps the FidoNet LINUX echo would be a more realistic place to discuss anything related to Linux.
Sean Rima wrote to Andrew Leary <=-
Andrew Leary wrote to Dan Clough <=-
> viable network these days? Thanks.Can you advise on the current state of LinuxNet? Is it still a
LinuxNet is still operating, barely. I can't get a response from Chad most of the time, although his system is still running and accepting
mail. I am still producing the distributed LinuxNet nodelists, although
I have no confirmation that they are actually making it out to Chad's downlinks.
All in all, I'm starting to think that there's not much reason to
continue it. Perhaps the FidoNet LINUX echo would be a more realistic place to discuss anything related to Linux.
I am sad to see it has died so much. I was trying to join but getting nothing from Chad.
I remember back in the day when we started LinuxNet, it was active and
a great place.
Oh, well, off I go. I do think there is a place for a dedicated Linux network but it needs to be maintained by the admin
Sean Rima wrote to Andrew Leary <=-
Andrew Leary wrote to Dan Clough <=-
> viable network these days? Thanks.Can you advise on the current state of LinuxNet? Is it
still a
LinuxNet is still operating, barely. I can't get a response
from Chad most of the time, although his system is still running
and accepting mail. I am still producing the distributed
LinuxNet nodelists, although I have no confirmation that they
are actually making it out to Chad's downlinks.
All in all, I'm starting to think that there's not much reason to continue it. Perhaps the FidoNet LINUX echo would be a more
realistic place to discuss anything related to Linux.
I am sad to see it has died so much. I was trying to join but
getting nothing from Chad.
I remember back in the day when we started LinuxNet, it was
active and a great place.
Oh, well, off I go. I do think there is a place for a dedicated
Linux network but it needs to be maintained by the admin
I am actually considering starting up an "alternative" Linux-focused network, and wondering if there would be interest. One thing
different would certainly be that it would be actively maintained...
Anyone that might be interested in such a thing - I'd be glad to hear
your thoughts on it...
I am actually considering starting up an "alternative" Linux-focused network, and wondering if there would be interest. One thingI would much rather see someone else take control of Linuxnet rather
different would certainly be that it would be actively maintained...
than start up a new network.
Why not talk to the current owner about taking over if he doesn't have
time to work and promote it? That is something I would get behind. I
don't think I'd want to try and start another new network from scratch.
Dan Clough wrote to Sean Rima <=-
I remember back in the day when we started LinuxNet, it was active
and
a great place.
Oh, well, off I go. I do think there is a place for a dedicated
Linux
network but it needs to be maintained by the admin
I am actually considering starting up an "alternative" Linux-focused network, and wondering if there would be interest. One thing different would certainly be that it would be actively maintained...
Anyone that might be interested in such a thing - I'd be glad to hear
your thoughts on it...
Nigel Reed wrote to All <=-
Linux network but it needs to be maintained by the admin
I am actually considering starting up an "alternative" Linux-focused
network, and wondering if there would be interest. One thing
different would certainly be that it would be actively maintained...
Anyone that might be interested in such a thing - I'd be glad to hear
your thoughts on it...
I would much rather see someone else take control of Linuxnet rather
than start up a new network.
Why not talk to the current owner about taking over if he doesn't have time to work and promote it? That is something I would get behind. I
don't think I'd want to try and start another new network from scratch.
I'd be interested in getting those messages (didnt realize there was a linuxnet?) - wasnt this run by Gert and it faded away?
Nigel Reed wrote to All <=-
Linux network but it needs to be maintained by the admin
I am actually considering starting up an "alternative"
Linux-focused network, and wondering if there would be interest.
One thing different would certainly be that it would be actively
maintained...
Anyone that might be interested in such a thing - I'd be glad to
hear your thoughts on it...
I would much rather see someone else take control of Linuxnet
rather than start up a new network.
Why not talk to the current owner about taking over if he
doesn't have time to work and promote it? That is something I
would get behind. I don't think I'd want to try and start
another new network from scratch.
As one of the original starters of LinuxNet before I let it go to
Gert, I was actually looking at restarting it as I thought it had
died.
Hello deon!
26 Feb 25 09:07, you wrote to Nigel Reed:
I'd be interested in getting those messages (didnt realize there
was a linuxnet?) - wasnt this run by Gert and it faded away?
Anything that got taken over by Gert died and faded away....
Best to just let it die, and use one of the existing area's on fido
or a othernet.
Nigel Reed wrote to All <=-
I remember back in the day when we started LinuxNet, it was
active and a great place.
Oh, well, off I go. I do think there is a place for a dedicated
Linux network but it needs to be maintained by the admin
I am actually considering starting up an "alternative" Linux-focused network, and wondering if there would be interest. One thing
different would certainly be that it would be actively maintained...
Anyone that might be interested in such a thing - I'd be glad to hear
your thoughts on it...
I would much rather see someone else take control of Linuxnet rather
than start up a new network.
Why not talk to the current owner about taking over if he doesn't have time to work and promote it? That is something I would get behind. I
don't think I'd want to try and start another new network from scratch.
deon wrote to Nigel Reed <=-
I am actually considering starting up an "alternative" Linux-focused network, and wondering if there would be interest. One thingI would much rather see someone else take control of Linuxnet rather
different would certainly be that it would be actively maintained...
than start up a new network.
Why not talk to the current owner about taking over if he doesn't have
time to work and promote it? That is something I would get behind. I
don't think I'd want to try and start another new network from scratch.
So as you might recall, I've taken over some othernets in the past -
only to see lots of initial messages of "great" and "thanks for keeping
it alive", then it to fade away and die.
Do we need another net? Could these linux focused conversations run an existing othernet - that most of us are already on?
I'd be interested in getting those messages (didnt realize there was a linuxnet?) - wasnt this run by Gert and it faded away?
Sean Rima wrote to Dan Clough <=-
I am actually considering starting up an "alternative" Linux-focused network, and wondering if there would be interest. One thing different would certainly be that it would be actively maintained...
Anyone that might be interested in such a thing - I'd be glad to hear
your thoughts on it...
Yeah I would be very interested in joining up
I am actually considering starting up an "alternative" Linux-focused network, and wondering if there
would be interest. One thing different would certainly be that it would be actively maintained...
Anyone that might be interested in such a thing - I'd be glad to hear your thoughts on it...
Mickey wrote to Dan Clough <=-networ
Re: Re: LinuxNet
By: Dan Clough to Sean Rima on Tue Feb 25 2025 15:36:37
I am actually considering starting up an "alternative" Linux-focused
k, and wondering if therebe
would be interest. One thing different would certainly be that it would
actively maintained...
Anyone that might be interested in such a thing - I'd be glad to hear your thoughts on it...
I'm by no means an expert with linux though this laptop runs on Debian. I'd certainly be interested in joining a new network.
Can you advise on the current state of LinuxNet?
I am actually considering starting up an "alternative" Linux-focused network, and wondering if there would be interest. One thing
different would certainly be that it would be actively maintained...
Anyone that might be interested in such a thing - I'd be glad to hear
your thoughts on it...
Dan Clough wrote to Sean Rima <=-
Sean Rima wrote to Dan Clough <=-
I am actually considering starting up an "alternative" Linux-focused
network, and wondering if there would be interest. One thing
different
would certainly be that it would be actively maintained...
Anyone that might be interested in such a thing - I'd be glad to
hear
your thoughts on it...
Yeah I would be very interested in joining up
OK Sean, thanks and stay tuned, we'll see where this goes...
Floris van Unen wrote to Dan Clough <=-
Can you advise on the current state of LinuxNet?
I am actually considering starting up an "alternative" Linux-focused network, and wondering if there would be interest. One thing
different would certainly be that it would be actively maintained...
Anyone that might be interested in such a thing - I'd be glad to hear
your thoughts on it...
would be happy to help out in any way or form!
I am actually considering starting up an "alternative" Linux-focused network, and wondering if there would be interest. One thing
different would certainly be that it would be actively maintained...
Anyone that might be interested in such a thing - I'd be glad to hear your thoughts on it...
I would much rather see someone else take control of Linuxnet rather than start up a new network.
Why not talk to the current owner about taking over if he doesn't have time to work and promote it? That is something I would get behind. I don't think I'd want to try and start another new network from scratch.
Certainly a possibility. One of the big issues with that is that the current ZC doesn't seem to respond to anything, and I think might not be
in favor of such a thing.
I suppose it's worth asking him, I can give that a try.
I would much rather see someone else take control of Linuxnet rather
than start up a new network.
Why not talk to the current owner about taking over if he doesn't have >> NR> time to work and promote it? That is something I would get behind. I
don't think I'd want to try and start another new network from scratch.
Certainly a possibility. One of the big issues with that is that the
current ZC doesn't seem to respond to anything, and I think might not be
in favor of such a thing.
I suppose it's worth asking him, I can give that a try.
Well.... an update on this. I've tried contacting Chad (the ZC) via email,
Fido netmail, and Linuxnet echomail, and have had no response. I'll give it a
little longer, but not gonna hold my breath.
If anyone knows another way to contact him, that would be great, and helpful. Basically wanting to know if he intends to continue running LinuxNet, and/or how he would feel about letting someone else do it.
Please advise here if anyone gets any further news... Thanks.
On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 15:36:37 -0600
"Dan Clough" (1:135/115) <Dan.Clough@f115.n135.z1.fidonet> wrote:
Sean Rima wrote to Andrew Leary <=-
Andrew Leary wrote to Dan Clough <=-
Can you advise on the current state of LinuxNet? Is it
still a viable network these days? Thanks.
LinuxNet is still operating, barely. I can't get a response
from Chad most of the time, although his system is still running
and accepting mail. I am still producing the distributed
LinuxNet nodelists, although I have no confirmation that they
are actually making it out to Chad's downlinks.
All in all, I'm starting to think that there's not much reason to continue it. Perhaps the FidoNet LINUX echo would be a more realistic place to discuss anything related to Linux.
I am actually considering starting up an "alternative" Linux-focused network, and wondering if there would be interest. One thing
different would certainly be that it would be actively maintained...
Anyone that might be interested in such a thing - I'd be glad to hear
your thoughts on it...
I would much rather see someone else take control of Linuxnet rather
than start up a new network.
Why not talk to the current owner about taking over if he doesn't have
time to work and promote it? That is something I would get behind. I
don't think I'd want to try and start another new network from scratch.
Re: Re: LinuxNet
By: Nigel Reed to All on Tue Feb 25 2025 03:45 pm
On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 15:36:37 -0600
"Dan Clough" (1:135/115) <Dan.Clough@f115.n135.z1.fidonet> wrote:
Sean Rima wrote to Andrew Leary <=-
Andrew Leary wrote to Dan Clough <=-
Can you advise on the current state of LinuxNet? Is it
still a viable network these days? Thanks.
LinuxNet is still operating, barely. I can't get a response
from Chad most of the time, although his system is still
running and accepting mail. I am still producing the
distributed LinuxNet nodelists, although I have no
confirmation that they are actually making it out to Chad's downlinks.
All in all, I'm starting to think that there's not much
reason to continue it. Perhaps the FidoNet LINUX echo
would be a more realistic place to discuss anything related
to Linux.
I am actually considering starting up an "alternative"
Linux-focused network, and wondering if there would be interest.
One thing different would certainly be that it would be
actively maintained...
Anyone that might be interested in such a thing - I'd be glad to
hear your thoughts on it...
I would much rather see someone else take control of Linuxnet
rather than start up a new network.
Why not talk to the current owner about taking over if he doesn't
have time to work and promote it? That is something I would get
behind. I don't think I'd want to try and start another new
network from scratch.
An update on this... I've tried to contact the current LinuxNet
operator via Netmail, Email, Echomail, and his local BBS message
base; for the last three weeks or so, with no response whatsoever.
So either he's ignoring or is just out of the loop completely.
Not sure what the next step is at this point. I've got an outline of
a plan for starting a replacement Net and may do that by sometime
next month. I've got some work/travel demands that will keep me too
busy until then.
Still interested in comments from you all on whether that's a good
idea, or some alternatives. I know there is a Fido Linux echo that
is mostly quiet, and not sure if that is a surefire indicator of how
a new Net would do, or not. Your thoughts are welcome if you have
any. --- SBBSecho 3.23-Linux
* Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL *
(1:135/115)
Nigel Reed wrote to All <=-
Why not talk to the current owner about taking over if he doesn't
have time to work and promote it? That is something I would get
behind. I don't think I'd want to try and start another new
network from scratch.
An update on this... I've tried to contact the current LinuxNet
operator via Netmail, Email, Echomail, and his local BBS message
base; for the last three weeks or so, with no response whatsoever.
So either he's ignoring or is just out of the loop completely.
Not sure what the next step is at this point. I've got an outline of
a plan for starting a replacement Net and may do that by sometime
next month. I've got some work/travel demands that will keep me too
busy until then.
Still interested in comments from you all on whether that's a good
idea, or some alternatives. I know there is a Fido Linux echo that
is mostly quiet, and not sure if that is a surefire indicator of how
a new Net would do, or not. Your thoughts are welcome if you have
any.
Just declare yourself 110:0/0 and have the hubs point to you. Done.
Nigel Reed wrote to All <=-
Why not talk to the current owner about taking over if he
doesn't have time to work and promote it? That is something I
would get behind. I don't think I'd want to try and start
another new network from scratch.
An update on this... I've tried to contact the current LinuxNet
operator via Netmail, Email, Echomail, and his local BBS message
base; for the last three weeks or so, with no response whatsoever.
So either he's ignoring or is just out of the loop completely.
Not sure what the next step is at this point. I've got an outline
of a plan for starting a replacement Net and may do that by
sometime next month. I've got some work/travel demands that will
keep me too busy until then.
Still interested in comments from you all on whether that's a good
idea, or some alternatives. I know there is a Fido Linux echo that
is mostly quiet, and not sure if that is a surefire indicator of
how a new Net would do, or not. Your thoughts are welcome if you
have any.
Just declare yourself 110:0/0 and have the hubs point to you.
Done.
Hehe, maybe, but it's a little more than that, and not sure how
"ethical" that would be. I guess it's a possibility, but seems a
little unlikely.
Thanks for the input, and hoping to get some more... ;-)
... All the easy problems have been solved.
=== MultiMail/Linux v0.52
--- SBBSecho 3.23-Linux
* Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL *
(1:135/115)
Nigel Reed wrote to All <=-
An update on this... I've tried to contact the current LinuxNet
operator via Netmail, Email, Echomail, and his local BBS message
base; for the last three weeks or so, with no response whatsoever.
So either he's ignoring or is just out of the loop completely.
Not sure what the next step is at this point. I've got an outline
of a plan for starting a replacement Net and may do that by
sometime next month. I've got some work/travel demands that will
keep me too busy until then.
Still interested in comments from you all on whether that's a good
idea, or some alternatives. I know there is a Fido Linux echo that
is mostly quiet, and not sure if that is a surefire indicator of
how a new Net would do, or not. Your thoughts are welcome if you
have any.
Just declare yourself 110:0/0 and have the hubs point to you.
Done.
Hehe, maybe, but it's a little more than that, and not sure how
"ethical" that would be. I guess it's a possibility, but seems a
little unlikely.
You want me to have a go and contact him? It's hit and miss sometimes.
Anyone that might be interested in such a thing - I'd be glad to hear your thoughts on it...
Jim Howarth wrote to Dan Clough <=-
Anyone that might be interested in such a thing - I'd be glad to hear
your thoughts on it...
I'd run a net like that.. mostly just for myself ultimately but it
would be on the BBS as well.
| Sysop: | Gate Keeper |
|---|---|
| Location: | Shelby, NC |
| Users: | 787 |
| Nodes: | 20 (0 / 20) |
| Uptime: | 79:52:52 |
| Calls: | 11,957 |
| Calls today: | 7 |
| Files: | 5,294 |
| D/L today: |
45 files (30,637K bytes) |
| Messages: | 554,805 |