Found this in another echo. I believe it is spot on.
"It is not the truth of Marxism that explains the willingness of intellectuals to believe it, but the power that it confers on intellectuals, in their attempts to control the world. And since...it is futile to reason someone out of a thing that he was not reasoned into,
we can conclude that Marxism owes its remarkable power to survive every criticism to the fact that it is not a truth-directed but a
power-directed system of thought."
Found this in another echo. I believe it is spot on.
"It is not the truth of Marxism that explains the willingness of intellectuals to believe it, but the power that it confers on intellectuals, in their attempts to control the world. And since...it is futile to reason someone out of a thing that he was not reasoned into,
we can conclude that Marxism owes its remarkable power to survive every criticism to the fact that it is not a truth-directed but a
power-directed system of thought."
"It is not the truth of Marxism that explains the willingness of intellectuals to believe it, but the power that it confers on intellectuals, in their attempts to control the world. And since...it is futile to reason someone out of a thing that he was not reasoned into,
we can conclude that Marxism owes its remarkable power to survive every criticism to the fact that it is not a truth-directed but a
power-directed system of thought."
Found this in another echo. I believe it is spot on.
"It is not the truth of Marxism that explains the willingness of intellectuals to believe it, but the power that it confers on intellectuals, in their attempts to control the world. And since...it is futile to reason someone out of a thing that he was not reasoned into, we can conclude that Marxism owes its remarkable power to survive every criticism to the fact that it is not a truth-directed but a power-directed system of thought."
It's a lot of nothing. All political systems are about power: who has it and who doesn't. Marx doesn't need any power; he's dead.
Also, I would remind you that earlier this year the sitting president of one of the world's foremost capitalist countries attempted a coup, and the party he was affiliated with continues their efforts to undermine democracy so that they can remain in power.
I think it fits nicely with any system where one group thinks they areFound this in another echo. I believe it is spot on.It's a lot of nothing. All political systems are about power: who has it who doesn't. Marx doesn't need any power; he's dead.
"It is not the truth of Marxism that explains the willingness of intellectuals to believe it, but the power that it confers on intellectuals, in their attempts to control the world. And since... futile to reason someone out of a thing that he was not reasoned in we can conclude that Marxism owes its remarkable power to survive e criticism to the fact that it is not a truth-directed but a power-directed system of thought."
the intellectual elite, and the other group that won't follow them is a bunch of dumb (fill-in-the-blank with "religious people," "hicks," "red-staters," "Trumpers," "kulaks," etc.)
Before you think of trying turn-tables, I don't think any Trump voter
here thought he was an intellectual elite, or that they were for voting for him.
Also, I would remind you that earlier this year the sitting president of of the world's foremost capitalist countries attempted a coup, and the p he was affiliated with continues their efforts to undermine democracy so they can remain in power.Trump was affiliated with the Democrats? They are "in (majority) power" in both houses and cannot manage to get the current President's agenda passed. They seem to be "undermining" themselves better than anyone from any other party would be able to.
The Republicans are "in power" of either Chamber of Congress or the White House, so they cannot "remain in power" of anything, so you can't mean them.
I think it fits nicely with any system where one group thinks they are
the intellectual elite, and the other group that won't follow them is a bunch of dumb (fill-in-the-blank with "religious people," "hicks," "red-staters," "Trumpers," "kulaks," etc.)
Before you think of trying turn-tables, I don't think any Trump voter
here thought he was an intellectual elite, or that they were for voting for him.
Found this in another echo. I believe it is spot on.
"It is not the truth of Marxism that explains the willingness of intellectuals to believe it, but the power that it confers on intellectuals, in their attempts to control the world. And since...it is futile to reason someone out of a thing that he was not reasoned into,
we can conclude that Marxism owes its remarkable power to survive every criticism to the fact that it is not a truth-directed but a
power-directed system of thought."
Sir Roger Scruton
Found this in another echo. I believe it is spot on.is
"It is not the truth of Marxism that explains the willingness of
intellectuals to believe it, but the power that it confers on
intellectuals, in their attempts to control the world. And since...it
futile to reason someone out of a thing that he was not reasonedinto,
we can conclude that Marxism owes its remarkable power to surviveevery
criticism to the fact that it is not a truth-directed but a
power-directed system of thought."
Capitalism and democracy have not been immune to corruption by power, either.
Look at Afghanistan for a recent example.
Trump was affiliated with the Democrats? They are "in (majority) power" in both houses and cannot manage to get the current President's agenda passed. They seem to be "undermining" themselves better than anyone from any other party would be able to.
You know better than that. I was referring to the restrictive and oppressive election laws being passed by Republican-controlled states.
Do you think that Trump was lying when he said that he was a "stable genius?"
And I suppose that whenever a conservative in here calls a liberal a "MORON" >or such, they're not thinking that they're not looking down on others?
Wanting people to prove who they are so that people like you cannot post 10 ballots? Sounds good to me.Trump was affiliated with the Democrats? They are "in (majority) p in both houses and cannot manage to get the current President's age passed. They seem to be "undermining" themselves better than anyone any other party would be able to.You know better than that. I was referring to the restrictive and oppres election laws being passed by Republican-controlled states.
Oh, I know, it is racism because for some reason you think that non-white citizens are more likely to have trouble proving who they are or
following rules or whatever the reason is this week.
Do you think that Trump was lying when he said that he was a "stable geni I have no idea.
And I suppose that whenever a conservative in here calls a liberal a "MOR >or such, they're not thinking that they're not looking down on others?If I say it, it usually means they have said something so stupid even I would not believe it.
I think it fits nicely with any system where one group thinks they are
the intellectual elite, and the other group that won't follow them is a
bunch of dumb (fill-in-the-blank with "religious people," "hicks,"
"red-staters," "Trumpers," "kulaks," etc.)
Come on, man. Don't you feel just a tiny bit intellectually superior to the
conservatives that held a rally in Dallas to welcome JFK and JFK Jr. back from the dead so that they could "reinstate" Trump with JFK Jr. as his VP?
While the kennedy father and son were no-shows, attendees claimed to have spotted several other deceased celebrities, including Robin Williams.
Not just a tiny bit?
Wanting people to prove who they are so that people like you cannot post 10 ballots? Sounds good to me.Trump was affiliated with the Democrats? They are "in (majority) in both houses and cannot manage to get the current President's agYou know better than that. I was referring to the restrictive and oppre
passed. They seem to be "undermining" themselves better than anyon
any other party would be able to.
election laws being passed by Republican-controlled states.
Are you accusing me of voter fraud?
Oh, I know, it is racism because for some reason you think that non-white
citizens are more likely to have trouble proving who they are or following rules or whatever the reason is this week.
Not specifically non-white, but definitely non-Republican.
Are you accusing me of voter fraud?Not directly. Of being someone who wouldn't care as long as it went in your favor...
Yes, that is why there is a Republican in the White House, and a Republican majority in the.... oh, wait....Oh, I know, it is racism because for some reason you think that non-whiteNot specifically non-white, but definitely non-Republican.
citizens are more likely to have trouble proving who they are or following rules or whatever the reason is this week.
Not directly. Of being someone who wouldn't care as long as it went in your favor...
Interesting. I'm not in favor of voter fraud in any case. However, I'm also not in favor of locking down the system so that some eligible voters face unreasonable hurdles to exercising their right to vote.
Are you someone who doesn't care if certain people can't vote as long as it went in your favor?
Yes, that is why there is a Republican in the White House, and a Republican majority in the.... oh, wait....Oh, I know, it is racism because for some reason you think that non-whiteNot specifically non-white, but definitely non-Republican.
citizens are more likely to have trouble proving who they are or following rules or whatever the reason is this week.
And that's why Republicans are continuing to come up with restrictive election laws. And they will continue to do so until the outcome guarantess them permanent minority rule.
No, I have given people rides to the polls even though I knew they were not voting the same way as me.Not directly. Of being someone who wouldn't care as long as it wen your favor...Interesting. I'm not in favor of voter fraud in any case. However, I'm a not in favor of locking down the system so that some eligible voters fac unreasonable hurdles to exercising their right to vote.
Are you someone who doesn't care if certain people can't vote as long as went in your favor?
What I am getting out of this is that you think Republicans are more likely to be able to follow the rules, while Democrats are less likelyAnd that's why Republicans are continuing to come up with restrictive election laws. And they will continue to do so until the outcome guarant them permanent minority rule.Yes, that is why there is a Republican in the White House, and a Republican majority in the.... oh, wait....Oh, I know, it is racism because for some reason you think t non-whiteNot specifically non-white, but definitely non-Republican.
citizens are more likely to have trouble proving who they ar following rules or whatever the reason is this week.
to be able to, or to want to.
Not directly. Of being someone who wouldn't care as long as it went
in
your favor...
Interesting. I'm not in favor of voter fraud in any case. However, I'm
also
not in favor of locking down the system so that some eligible voters face
unreasonable hurdles to exercising their right to vote.
Are you someone who doesn't care if certain people can't vote as long as
it
went in your favor?
No, I have given people rides to the polls even though I knew they were not
voting the same way as me.
And that's why Republicans are continuing to come up with restrictive
election laws. And they will continue to do so until the outcome guarantess
them permanent minority rule.
What I am getting out of this is that you think Republicans are more likely
to be able to follow the rules, while Democrats are less likely to be able to, or to want to.
Do you think that Trump was lying when he said that he was a "stable
genius?"
I have no idea.
And I suppose that whenever a conservative in here calls a liberal a
"MORON"
or such, they're not thinking that they're not looking down on others?
If I say it, it usually means they have said something so stupid even I would not believe it.
Not specifically non-white, but definitely non-Republican.
Yes, that is why there is a Republican in the White House, and a Republican
majority in the.... oh, wait....
Sysop: | Gate Keeper |
---|---|
Location: | Shelby, NC |
Users: | 719 |
Nodes: | 20 (0 / 20) |
Uptime: | 157:20:38 |
Calls: | 9,280 |
Calls today: | 12 |
Files: | 5,288 |
D/L today: |
12 files (1,003K bytes) |
Messages: | 467,182 |