I have said it before. There are no moderators in Fidonet.
There are also no moderators in this echo. Never have been.
I have said it before. There are no moderators in Fidonet.
There are also no moderators in this echo. Never have been.
Being a Fidonet echo "moderator" is more like being a -curator- of the echo.
If an echo didn't have a curator, then people wouldn't post anything in there.
Then sysops wouldn't bother to subscribe to the echo.
Maybe Mike's bullying you behind the scenes?
Sending you innapropriate text messages perhaps? lol
Tell us what he's done to you!
Don't let him moderate you any longer!
Don't let him moderate you any longer!
He can't, no matter how hard he tries.
BBS softwares lack the technology to allow a Fidonet echo moderator to delete messages on individual BBSs, or to even block the flow of messages,
Don't let him moderate you any longer!
He can't, no matter how hard he tries.
Posting the rules is moderating.
Asking people to obey the rules is moderating.
So then, Mike is "moderating" this echo.
BBS softwares lack the technology to allow a Fidonet echo moderator to delete
messages on individual BBSs, or to even block the flow of messages, unlike internet forum moderators. "Moderator" means less in the Fido world than it
does in the internet world, but just try to take that all in moderation :)
BBS softwares lack the technology to allow a Fidonet echo moderator to delete messages on individual BBSs, or to even block the flow of messages,
... If you got your feed for this echo from me, for example, you
would be receiving a version that lacks a couple of users who cannot participate in an adult manner, instead resorting to profanity or sexist remarks. Their posts don't show up here, and do not flow to downlinks.
The caveat is that their posts get scrubbed from any echo I have available.
I weighed that fact and realized I would not be missing anything. Their posts are not scrubbed from passthru echoes.
... If you got your feed for this echo from me, for example, you
would be receiving a version that lacks a couple of users who cannot participate in an adult manner, instead resorting to profanity or sexist remarks. Their posts don't show up here, and do not flow to downlinks.
The caveat is that their posts get scrubbed from any echo I have available.
I weighed that fact and realized I would not be missing anything. Their posts are not scrubbed from passthru echoes.
BBS softwares lack the technology to allow a Fidonet echo moderator t delete messages on individual BBSs, or to even block the flow of mess
Really? So you haven't heard of crashmail, that I've been using for
two decades now:
Commands
--------
TWIT
Don't import the message. The message will be sent to downlinks as
usual.
Example:
FILTER TYPE=ECHOMAIL and FROMNAME="Hubba Hopp"
TWIT
Mike is free to post whatever rules he wants.
Mike is free to obey the rules he posts. Or not.
Other than that, his "powers" are non-existent.
Every participant (and non-participant) has a <N>ext key.
BBS softwares lack the technology to allow a Fidonet echo moderator to delete messages on individual BBSs, or to even block the flow of messa
Not true. If you got your feed for this echo from me, for example, you would be receiving a version that lacks a couple of users who cannot participate in an adult manner, instead resorting to profanity or sexist remarks. Their posts don't show up here, and do not flow to downlinks.
Mike is free to post whatever rules he wants.
Mike is free to obey the rules he posts. Or not.
Other than that, his "powers" are non-existent.
I'll just keep obeying the rules just in case.
You never know.
He could be a cop.
What's gonna happen if he pulls me over?
"Aaron Thomas eh? You're the guy who keeps on posting false falacies on my fido echo!"
Every participant (and non-participant) has a <N>ext key.
Some sysops are tyrants, and they restrict access to that command.
They force users to read stuff they don't want to read (Maxine Waters would
say "it's just like slavery.")
moderator toBBS softwares lack the technology to allow a Fidonet echo
messadelete messages on individual BBSs, or to even block the flow of
Not true. If you got your feed for this echo from me, for example,you
would be receiving a version that lacks a couple of users who cannotsexist
participate in an adult manner, instead resorting to profanity or
remarks. Their posts don't show up here, and do not flow todownlinks.
It's probably just kids. I harrassed the Fido people when I was a kid ;)
Aaron Thomas wrote to Lee Lofaso <=-
Some sysops are tyrants, and they restrict access to that command. They force users to read stuff they don't want to read (Maxine Waters would
say "it's just like slavery.")
Of course, you can use the same argument that the Lefties used when confronted by the blatent censorship on platforms like Facebook:
They are privately owned companies and don't have to obey the First Amendment.
Some sysops are tyrants, and they restrict access to that command. Th force users to read stuff they don't want to read (Maxine Waters woul say "it's just like slavery.")
Of course, you can use the same argument that the Lefties used when confronted by the blatent censorship on platforms like Facebook:
They are privately owned companies and don't have to obey the First Amendment.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
It's only a matter of time before a leftist tries to sue a BBS sysop
for human rights violations.
A ex-friend of mine, who I had known for
like 30 years, suddenly got hurt feelings because he thought I
restricted his access on my BBS, and now he won't talk to me anymore.
Good thing he's a conservative!
It's only a matter of time before a leftist tries to sue a BBS sysop for human rights violations.Sadly, too true. But if that happens, it could be used for suing
Facebook for the same thing.
sysopIt's only a matter of time before a leftist tries to sue a BBS
for human rights violations.
Sadly, too true. But if that happens, it could be used for suing
Facebook for the same thing.
So, bringing this all together, what you're saying is that it's only a matter
of time before a conservative tries to sue Facebook for human rights violations, but that doing so requires a "leftist" to set precedent by suing
a BBS sysop for the same thing. Did the hypocrisy of this prediction escape
you?
So, bringing this all together, what you're saying is that it's only matterFacebook's stock value dropped $250 billion yesterday. The largest
of time before a conservative tries to sue Facebook for human rights violations, but that doing so requires a "leftist" to set precedent b suing
a BBS sysop for the same thing. Did the hypocrisy of this prediction escape
you?
value loss in a single day by any company in history. Another day or
two should finish Facebook (Meta) off forever.
Person 1 perceives Person 2 slighted them.
Person 1 don't ask Person 2 to clear things up, but rather assumes the worst. Person 1 then treats Person 2 as though Person 1's fantasy is reality. Lots of drama ensues because Person 1 won't admit that they
made a mistake.
Sysop: | Gate Keeper |
---|---|
Location: | Shelby, NC |
Users: | 719 |
Nodes: | 20 (0 / 20) |
Uptime: | 167:22:48 |
Calls: | 9,280 |
Files: | 5,288 |
D/L today: |
9 files (10,157K bytes) |
Messages: | 467,369 |