What part of the above can be even slightly ambiguous? Anybody who
knows? Is it the SCOTUS that's been at it again?
Do I have to read the morning newspaper to find they've served their political breadmasters again ?
On Mon Jul 25 00:00:00 2022, BJORN FELTEN(2:203/2) wrote to Ward Dossche <=-
Well, I asked the question in another social media, and the only reply I got, said that the SCOTUS has worked the last two decades to effectively repeal that law.Its the way it is.
So I guess, if the USA will ever want to become a corruption free society, they must first > reorganize their SCOTUS.
I want a blanket law that phases out politicians over 80 in the Surpreme Court, Presidency/VP, US Senate and congress.
So I guess, if the USA will ever want to become a corruption free society, they must first reorganize their SCOTUS.
Its the way it is.
The court is going to be freaky no matter who controls it.
I think it will have another 30+ years of control when DeSantis or Trump squashes Biden or Newsolini in 2024.
Thomas and Alito will resign for younger members of the court.
I want a blanket law that phases out politicians over 80 in the Surpreme Court, Presidency/VP, US Senate and congress.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Matt Munson <=-
(Leftists are intimidated by the unborn.)
Sysop: | Gate Keeper |
---|---|
Location: | Shelby, NC |
Users: | 719 |
Nodes: | 20 (0 / 20) |
Uptime: | 159:12:54 |
Calls: | 9,280 |
Calls today: | 12 |
Files: | 5,288 |
D/L today: |
14 files (1,087K bytes) |
Messages: | 467,217 |