By now the entire country is fully aware that is a complete lie, You
are either deliberately blind or completely taken in by
the democrat smoke screen (I'd bet on both).
As getting the entire country to agree on anything is impossible, I doubt
they are all fully aware of anything. Most are more likely "fully aware"
of whatever their trusted news sources tell them is truth.
BTW....I have the full Mueller report and nowhere in that report does it PROVE that Trump or anyone working on his campaign `colluded' with Russia.
I think the difference is the definition of what was "colluded" on. We
have been led to believe, by HRC and others, that Trump's campaign colluded with Russia to steal an election. I have read a technical briefing about
this claim... there apparently was no proof this.
What there was proof of is that:
(1) Russians "touched," but did not alter and apparently did not take any
data from, government data systems in all 50 states. This was done so that... (2) Upon the election of HRC, the Russians could flood social media with
claims that "Russia had tampered with the election" in order to cast doubt
on Hillary's victory. As they have done this in other counties, this is believable.
Now, since HRC didn't get elected, they didn't have to do #2. I have not
read or seen anything that indicates Trump's win was not as much of a
surprise to them as it was to the rest of the World.
Since then, the umbrella of "collusion" has been expanded to include some financial and business dealings that people in Trump's circle had with
Russians and Ukranians, which they got in trouble for. Most of the time,
when people are talking here about the "collusion" being "real," this is
what they are talking about.
I have not seen any hard evidence that Monifort, for example, didn't have
some shady business dealings with those groups, so I cannot say that this "collusion" is not true.
Of course, I have also not seen any hard evidence that Hunter Biden did not also have some shady business dealings with the Ukraine, or China, and that
Joe was not involved in providing assistance with these dealings. As a
matter of fact, I have seen evidence of Joe bragging about being involved... but all of that will soon be "proven false" once Joe gets sworn in.
But there IS proof that the Clintons colluded with Russians. In fact...the only collusion with Russians was on the side of leftie democrats!
The Clinton foundation got rich off the Russians!
The Clinton Foundation is a sham to help them get rich off of anyone fool enough to give them money.
The Clintons were getting rich off of dealings with Russian. The whole "Russian collusion (with the election)" thing was born from her (and her supporters) feeling betrayed that Russia was not attempting to help her get elected after she believed they'd been so buddy-buddy for years.
* SLMR 2.1a * The four snack groups: cakes, crunchies, frozen, sweets.
--- SBBSecho 3.11-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)