• Re: Pipeline

    From Jeff Thiele@1:387/26 to Mike Powell on Wednesday, March 10, 2021 17:35:24
    On 10 Mar 2021, Mike Powell said the following...
    You are the one who brought up design and testing. That puts the burden of proof on you.

    Nope. If the design was improved, that's up to you to prove.

    Jeff.

    "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong." -- H. L. Mencken, who indeed was a racist thereby proving himself right.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
    * Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)
  • From Jeff Thiele@1:387/26 to Mike Powell on Wednesday, March 10, 2021 17:37:00
    On 10 Mar 2021, Mike Powell said the following...
    For Biden, the requests of the left-leaning Democrats was enough. That
    is not leadership. Who needs the EPA when you have experts like AOC and Jeff to advise you.

    Or maybe a 400,000-gallon spill was enough.

    Jeff.

    "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong." -- H. L. Mencken, who indeed was a racist thereby proving himself right.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
    * Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to JEFF THIELE on Wednesday, March 10, 2021 16:59:00
    Has Jeff actually proven that those design and testing considerations were not in place?

    Have Mike or Gregory actually proven that they were?

    You are the one who brought up design and testing. That puts the burden of proof on you.


    * SLMR 2.1a * Multitasking: When you get the weekend chore list.
    --- SBBSecho 3.12-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to GREGORY DEYSS on Wednesday, March 10, 2021 17:00:00
    I do find it odd when I looked to Joe Biden where as; he should come up with a
    solution, he folded like a house of cards, as he alluded that it would be up to the company to complete this job anyway they saw fit. What struck me as weird was without any input from the EPA? Doesn't seem likely does it? This of course also requires leadership, and good educated minds, who can provide the best way forward. The problem becomes apparent when you go out of
    your way to cherry pick people based on skill color or worse, something tells me that you might not be getting the most bang for your buck.

    For Biden, the requests of the left-leaning Democrats was enough. That is
    not leadership. Who needs the EPA when you have experts like AOC and Jeff
    to advise you.

    In other words, it could have been prevented if the parent was not neglectful, which is something an American citizen would go to jail for, and be separated from their children for.

    Makes sense to me also.

    I figured it would.

    Not sure why people cannot understand that. Seems like a double standard.

    Liberals think in one direction, consequently, it is the wrong direction.

    In most instances, I believe you are correct. In some instances, I feel
    like they are thinking in the right direction but are not being very
    practical about it. Like, yeah, "greener" energy sources would be a good
    thing but until they are as scalable as the current sources, they are not
    at all practical. Keep trying and let us know when you actually get there.


    * SLMR 2.1a * Perhaps this situation requires a more Klingon response.
    --- SBBSecho 3.12-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to GREGORY DEYSS on Wednesday, March 10, 2021 17:02:00
    No he just assumed that Trump did not take into this into account the >JT> GD> assumed naturally once again that Trump was the one to blame for the >JT> GD> threat that was amongst the environment.

    Can you prove otherwise?
    I will check into it, but you might like the results.

    He brought safety up to begin with. Burden of proof is on him, not you.


    * SLMR 2.1a * Why is the word abbreviation so long?
    --- SBBSecho 3.12-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to JEFF THIELE on Thursday, March 11, 2021 16:52:00
    You are the one who brought up design and testing. That puts the burden of proof on you.

    Nope. If the design was improved, that's up to you to prove.

    You questioned it, you need to find the answer.

    Sort of like me saying "solar kills birds" but not posting any proof to
    back it up. It isn't your burden to prove that wrong if I cannot prove it correct.


    * SLMR 2.1a * "Criminal Lawyer" is a redundancy.
    --- SBBSecho 3.12-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Jeff Thiele@1:387/26 to Mike Powell on Thursday, March 11, 2021 19:17:28
    On 11 Mar 2021, Mike Powell said the following...
    You questioned it, you need to find the answer.

    Not how it works. You're the one who says that the design has been improved, prove it.

    Jeff.

    "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong." -- H. L. Mencken, who indeed was a racist thereby proving himself right.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
    * Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to JEFF THIELE on Friday, March 12, 2021 16:44:00
    You questioned it, you need to find the answer.

    Not how it works. You're the one who says that the design has been improved, prove it.

    No I never said that. I think you are misinformed. What I asked was if
    you had ever proven that it was faulty. That is what I have continued to
    ask, but you apparently don't want to prove that it was because maybe you can't?


    * SLMR 2.1a * Trespassers will be shot, survivors will be shot again!
    --- SBBSecho 3.12-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Jeff Thiele@1:387/26 to Mike Powell on Friday, March 12, 2021 18:28:12
    On 12 Mar 2021, Mike Powell said the following...
    No I never said that. I think you are misinformed. What I asked was if you had ever proven that it was faulty. That is what I have continued to ask, but you apparently don't want to prove that it was because maybe you can't?

    It spilled 400,000 gallons of oil, didn't it? Was that by design?

    Jeff.

    "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong." -- H. L. Mencken, who indeed was a racist thereby proving himself right.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
    * Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)
  • From MIKE POWELL@1:2320/105 to JEFF THIELE on Saturday, March 13, 2021 10:18:00
    It spilled 400,000 gallons of oil, didn't it? Was that by design?

    If it did it was fixed. You have been saying it is currently unsafe, or
    was until Mr. Biden cancelled it? So it is on you to tell us how they did
    not fix it properly.


    * SLMR 2.1a * "At last I'm organized," he sighed, and died.

    ---
    * BgNet 1.0b12 = moe's tavern * 1-502-875-8938 * moetiki.ddns.net:27
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Jeff Thiele@1:387/26 to MIKE POWELL on Saturday, March 13, 2021 18:28:49
    On 13 Mar 2021, MIKE POWELL said the following...
    It spilled 400,000 gallons of oil, didn't it? Was that by design?
    If it did it was fixed. You have been saying it is currently unsafe, or was until Mr. Biden cancelled it? So it is on you to tell us how they
    did not fix it properly.

    It did, in North Dakota. And yes, the part that broke was fixed. But the
    rest was not touched, and the new sections would have been built identical to the rest of it, with the same potential for failure.

    Prove me wrong.

    Jeff.

    "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong." -- H. L. Mencken, who indeed was a racist thereby proving himself right.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
    * Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)
  • From Jeff Thiele@1:387/26 to MIKE POWELL on Saturday, March 13, 2021 19:10:30
    On 13 Mar 2021, MIKE POWELL said the following...
    If it did it was fixed. You have been saying it is currently unsafe, or was until Mr. Biden cancelled it? So it is on you to tell us how they
    did not fix it properly.

    I can find no evidence that either the existing Keystone XL pipeline was retrofitted to fix the design flaws which resulted in the 400,000-gallon
    spill, or that the new sections were designed differently from the existing sections to address the same weakness.

    Furthermore, I do not believe that Trump would force the owners of th
    Keystone XL to either retrofit existing pipeline or redesign planned
    pipelines, given his stance on government regulation, especially as it
    applies to the environment.

    This gives me adequate reason to believe that the status quo would be maintained regarding the Keystone XL pipeline.

    Do you have any evidence showing that we should have expected anything different from Trump and the Keystone XL owners?

    Jeff.

    "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong." -- H. L. Mencken, who indeed was a racist thereby proving himself right.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
    * Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to JEFF THIELE on Sunday, March 14, 2021 10:25:00
    It did, in North Dakota. And yes, the part that broke was fixed. But the rest was not touched, and the new sections would have been built identical to the rest of it, with the same potential for failure.

    Prove me wrong.

    Still on you to prove that "would have been built identical" actually
    happened that way. Otherwise, it is still proof only 'cause Jeff says so.


    * SLMR 2.1a * */ --Tribble with a lightsaber
    --- SBBSecho 3.12-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Jeff Thiele@1:387/26 to Mike Powell on Monday, March 15, 2021 09:07:42
    On 14 Mar 2021, Mike Powell said the following...
    Still on you to prove that "would have been built identical" actually happened that way. Otherwise, it is still proof only 'cause Jeff says
    so.

    TransCanada's website provides no substantial evidence of design improvements since 2017. The 400,000-gallon North Dakota spill was in 2019. Since 2019,
    they seem to be investing mostly in monitoring the pipeline from inside the pipe (relying on the 2017 detection technology, which failed in 2019), on the ground, and from the air. So in other words, they're not saying it won't
    spill; they're hoping they'll catch the spills early. And since most of the pipeline is buried 10 feet underground, by the time ground and/or air monitoring detect a spill, it's already a pretty big spill.

    https://www.tcenergy.com/sustainability/safety/pipeline-and-operations/

    Jeff.

    "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong." -- H. L. Mencken, who indeed was a racist thereby proving himself right.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
    * Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)
  • From Jeff Thiele@1:387/26 to Mike Powell on Monday, March 15, 2021 09:11:27
    On 14 Mar 2021, Mike Powell said the following...
    Still on you to prove that "would have been built identical" actually happened that way. Otherwise, it is still proof only 'cause Jeff says
    so.

    There is no proof that it "happened that way" because the additional sections of pipeline were never built. So if you're going by what actually happened
    then no, the new sections did not contain design improvements over the older sections because the new sections were never built.

    Jeff.

    "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong." -- H. L. Mencken, who indeed was a racist thereby proving himself right.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
    * Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)