You are the one who brought up design and testing. That puts the burden of proof on you.
For Biden, the requests of the left-leaning Democrats was enough. That
is not leadership. Who needs the EPA when you have experts like AOC and Jeff to advise you.
Has Jeff actually proven that those design and testing considerations were not in place?
Have Mike or Gregory actually proven that they were?
I do find it odd when I looked to Joe Biden where as; he should come up with a
solution, he folded like a house of cards, as he alluded that it would be up to the company to complete this job anyway they saw fit. What struck me as weird was without any input from the EPA? Doesn't seem likely does it? This of course also requires leadership, and good educated minds, who can provide the best way forward. The problem becomes apparent when you go out of
your way to cherry pick people based on skill color or worse, something tells me that you might not be getting the most bang for your buck.
In other words, it could have been prevented if the parent was not neglectful, which is something an American citizen would go to jail for, and be separated from their children for.
Makes sense to me also.
Not sure why people cannot understand that. Seems like a double standard.
Liberals think in one direction, consequently, it is the wrong direction.
I will check into it, but you might like the results.No he just assumed that Trump did not take into this into account the >JT> GD> assumed naturally once again that Trump was the one to blame for the >JT> GD> threat that was amongst the environment.
Can you prove otherwise?
You are the one who brought up design and testing. That puts the burden of proof on you.
Nope. If the design was improved, that's up to you to prove.
You questioned it, you need to find the answer.
You questioned it, you need to find the answer.
Not how it works. You're the one who says that the design has been improved, prove it.
No I never said that. I think you are misinformed. What I asked was if you had ever proven that it was faulty. That is what I have continued to ask, but you apparently don't want to prove that it was because maybe you can't?
It spilled 400,000 gallons of oil, didn't it? Was that by design?
It spilled 400,000 gallons of oil, didn't it? Was that by design?If it did it was fixed. You have been saying it is currently unsafe, or was until Mr. Biden cancelled it? So it is on you to tell us how they
did not fix it properly.
If it did it was fixed. You have been saying it is currently unsafe, or was until Mr. Biden cancelled it? So it is on you to tell us how they
did not fix it properly.
It did, in North Dakota. And yes, the part that broke was fixed. But the rest was not touched, and the new sections would have been built identical to the rest of it, with the same potential for failure.
Prove me wrong.
Still on you to prove that "would have been built identical" actually happened that way. Otherwise, it is still proof only 'cause Jeff says
so.
Still on you to prove that "would have been built identical" actually happened that way. Otherwise, it is still proof only 'cause Jeff says
so.
Sysop: | Gate Keeper |
---|---|
Location: | Shelby, NC |
Users: | 719 |
Nodes: | 20 (0 / 20) |
Uptime: | 155:52:36 |
Calls: | 9,280 |
Calls today: | 12 |
Files: | 5,288 |
D/L today: |
11 files (973K bytes) |
Messages: | 467,169 |