Chelsea Clinton says Tucker Carlson should be banned from Facebook.
Or from wherever else he chooses to spout his mouth. You know why?
Because of what he says.
Chelsea Clinton says Tucker Carlson should be banned from Facebook.
Or from wherever else he chooses to spout his mouth. You know why?
Because of what he says.
Tucker Carlson isn't a news reporter though; he's an op-ed writer.
Chelsea Clinton should be banned from Facebook for having such an unsightly
profile photo.
Tucker Carlson isn't a news reporter though; he's an op-ed writer.
Regardless of what you might want to call him, the fact remains
he wrote what he wrote - as quoted in my message.
However, I am glad you agree with FB's policy, and that FB should
keep its word by carrying out its policy of banning folks who have
made fake claims about covid-19 vaccines - claims that have been
Tucker Carlson isn't a news reporter though; he's an op-ed writer.
Regardless of what you might want to call him, the fact remains
he wrote what he wrote - as quoted in my message.
It's not what I want to call him - he's not responsible for stating facts to
the public.
However, I am glad you agree with FB's policy, and that FB should
keep its word by carrying out its policy of banning folks who have
made fake claims about covid-19 vaccines - claims that have been
They should ban whoever they want.
"This establishment reserves the right to refuse service to anyone at any time."
They shouldn't risk losing business though - that's their mistake.
Half of America is ready to dump them just like they did with CNN.
Tucker Carlson is responsible for everything he says and does.
Including making false claims, as noted by Chelsea Clinton.
FB has a policy of banning folks who make false claims concerning
covid-19 vaccines. It has been shown by Chelsea Clinton and others
that Tucker Carlson violated FB's policy. Therefore, FB should own
I don't believe that Tucker Carlson would make a false claim, but if he did, he's as guilty as SNL.
Tucker Carlson is responsible for everything he says and does.
Including making false claims, as noted by Chelsea Clinton.
I don't believe that Tucker Carlson would make a false claim,
but if he did, he's as guilty as SNL.
FB has a policy of banning folks who make false claims concerning
covid-19 vaccines. It has been shown by Chelsea Clinton and others
that Tucker Carlson violated FB's policy. Therefore, FB should own
Chelsea Clinton is nobody. Her dad's a disgraced ex-president, and her mom's
a disgrace in general. What reason does Chelsea have to pay any attention to Tucker Carlson?
My parents (not disgraces) taught me that if you don't like
something, then don't look at it.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Lee Lofaso <=-
Chelsea Clinton is nobody. Her dad's a disgraced ex-president, and her mom's a disgrace in general. What reason does Chelsea have to pay any attention to Tucker Carlson? My parents (not disgraces) taught me that
if you don't like something, then don't look at it.
I don't believe that Tucker Carlson would make a false claim, but if he
did, he's as guilty as SNL.
SNL provides better and more up to date news than FOX or the Tucker show although SNL is entertainment.
FOX news doesn't seem to care about facts, just stories and they have an abundance of those.
Chelsea Clinton is nobody. Her dad's a disgraced ex-president, and her
mom's a disgrace in general. What reason does Chelsea have to pay any
attention to Tucker Carlson? My parents (not disgraces) taught me that
if you don't like something, then don't look at it.
But Lefties hate Tucker because he's speaking about things they don't want spoken about. The Left needs to maintain control of the Narrative. If too
many people start speaking about how the Narrative is untrue, the false reality that the Left wants to spin falls apart.
So cancelling Tucker has nothing to do with what anyone likes. It has do to with control.
SNL provides better and more up to date news than FOX or the Tucker show altho
h SNL is entertainment.
FOX news doesn't seem to care about facts, just stories and they have an abund
ce of those.
FOX news doesn't seem to care about facts, just stories and they have an abundance of those.
Then why do you continue to watch Tucker Carlson on Fox News, or
follow him on FB?
FOX news doesn't seem to care about facts, just stories and they havean
abundance of those.
Fox ranks 2nd in news channels in the states with MSNBC being 1st and CNN being 3rd. (According to this article anyway:)
Then why do you continue to watch Tucker Carlson on Fox News, or
follow him on FB?
I don't watch Tucker and I don't follow him on facebook. I don't even watch
fox news, but I read a little foxnews.com
I've seen the Tucker Show before though. He's an opinion writer. He doesn't
have to tell the truth. Only on liberal media platforms does he have to tell
the truth (or get kicked off.)
SNL provides better and more up to date news than FOX or the Tuckershow altho
h SNL is entertainment.
FOX news doesn't seem to care about facts, just stories and they havean abund
ce of those.
Your apparent belief that SNL provides facts is very telling.
Ron Lauzon wrote to Aaron Thomas <=-
@MSGID: <607D861F.2111.fidonet_politics@caughtinadream.com>
@REPLY: <607C6A9D.2093.fidonet_politics@caughtinadream.com>
@TZ: ff10
Aaron Thomas wrote to Lee Lofaso <=-
Chelsea Clinton is nobody. Her dad's a disgraced ex-president, and her mom's a disgrace in general. What reason does Chelsea have to pay any attention to Tucker Carlson? My parents (not disgraces) taught me that
if you don't like something, then don't look at it.
But Lefties hate Tucker because he's speaking about things they
don't want spoken about. The Left needs to maintain control of the Narrative. If too many people start speaking about how the
Narrative is untrue, the false reality that the Left wants to spin
falls apart.
So cancelling Tucker has nothing to do with what anyone likes. It
has do to with control.
SNL provides better and more up to date news than FOX or the Tucker
show although SNL is entertainment.
FOX news doesn't seem to care about facts, just stories and they have
an abundance of those.
Your apparent belief that SNL provides facts is very telling.
Fox ranks 2nd in news channels in the states with MSNBC being 1st and CNN being 3rd. (According to this article anyway:)
So cancelling Tucker has nothing to do with what anyone likes. It has do to with control.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Ron Lauzon <=-
I'm sure it gives Mark Zuckerberg a rager. I just think it's ridiculous for him (or the facebook corportation) to think that anyone really
follows Tucker on Facebook anyway.
Stuff that Tucker says is fun entertainment, but I don't care if I miss something he said.
FOX news doesn't seem to care about facts, just stories and they havan
abundance of those.
Fox ranks 2nd in news channels in the states with MSNBC being 1st and being 3rd. (According to this article anyway:)
The subject is not whatever Fox News might be ranked.
It is about FB's policy to ban those who spout fake news
about covid-19 vaccines.
The question is, should FB ban Tucker Carlson due to its own policy,
or give him a pass?
SNL provides better and more up to date news than FOX or the Tucker
show although SNL is entertainment.
FOX news doesn't seem to care about facts, just stories and they have
an abundance of those.
Your apparent belief that SNL provides facts is very telling.
SNL is satire/comedy or entertainment as I said.
Even so it's more believable than Tucker, or fox news.
My parents (not disgraces) taught me that
if you don't like something, then don't look at it.
Even so it's more believable than Tucker, or fox news.
You also said "SNL provides better... news" which, to me, to be news requires it to be factual. So, you either believe that SNL provides facts, or that news doesn't have to contain facts. Either is telling.
I'm about the same. When he roasts Lefties for their hypocracy, it's
very entertaining.
But that's why the Lefties don't like him. Pointing out their hypocracy damages the Narrative.
When they mention someone going after Dr. Seuss (or whoever) as "progress," I point back to the rock and roll issue and they get really upset. They can't understand that rock and roll was offending someone
at the time just like (whatever) is offending them now.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Ron Lauzon <=-
They should update their terms of service like this:
"Everything you say must be either truthful or fulfill
Democrat-approved narratives, even if you're just a 15 year old
internet troll, or we'll ban you for life."
they havFOX news doesn't seem to care about facts, just stories and
an
abundance of those.
1st andFox ranks 2nd in news channels in the states with MSNBC being
being 3rd. (According to this article anyway:)
The subject is not whatever Fox News might be ranked.
It is about FB's policy to ban those who spout fake news
about covid-19 vaccines.
Jeff's showing us how jumping around is fun sometimes :)
But Al was saying "Fox is full of it" but they aren't. Tucker Carlson might
be full of it, but Brett Bair isn't full of it.
The question is, should FB ban Tucker Carlson due to its own policy,
or give him a pass?
They should ban him because that's what liberal douche policies call for.
You also said "SNL provides better... news" which, to me, to be news requires it to be factual. So, you either believe that SNL provides facts
or that news doesn't have to contain facts. Either is telling.
The meaning is simple. Just as I clearly explained to you.
When they mention someone going after Dr. Seuss (or whoever) as
"progress," I point back to the rock and roll issue and they get really
upset. They can't understand that rock and roll was offending someone
at the time just like (whatever) is offending them now.
Ozzy Osbourne is one of those people - he was sued because a fan killed himself after listening to "Suicide Solution," but now he's a Biden supporter.
The meaning is simple. Just as I clearly explained to you.
After you walked it back, it is about as clear as everything else you post.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Mike Powell <=-
Ozzy Osbourne is one of those people - he was sued because a fan killed himself after listening to "Suicide Solution," but now he's a Biden supporter.
I didn't walk anything back.
The subject is not whatever Fox News might be ranked.
It is about FB's policy to ban those who spout fake news
about covid-19 vaccines.
Jeff's showing us how jumping around is fun sometimes :)
Your refusal to answer the question make you look like a funny
little kid who knows nothing about what he is talking about.
So when is FB going to ban Tucker Carlson for violating its policy?
And when is Fox News going to fire Tucker Carson? If it is all about ratings, both are failing miserably.
I have no idea what "liberal douch policies" are, or might be.
Ozzy Osbourne is one of those people - he was sued because a fan kill himself after listening to "Suicide Solution," but now he's a Biden supporter.
I suppose the next thing you'll say is the producer of *M*A*S*H*
should be sued due to the theme song being "Suicide is Painless".
Ozzy Osbourne is one of those people - he was sued because a fan himself after listening to "Suicide Solution," but now he's a Bi supporter.
I suppose the next thing you'll say is the producer of *M*A*S*H* should be sued due to the theme song being "Suicide is Painless".
No but the new Ozzy will say it.
But Lefties hate Tucker because he's speaking about things they don't
want spoken about. The Left needs to maintain control of the Narrative. If too many people start speaking about how the Narrative is untrue, the false reality that the Left wants to spin falls apart.
Fox ranks 2nd in news channels in the states with MSNBC being 1st and CNN being 3rd. (According to this article anyway:)
killOzzy Osbourne is one of those people - he was sued because a fan
Bidenhimself after listening to "Suicide Solution," but now he's a
supporter.
I suppose the next thing you'll say is the producer of *M*A*S*H*
should be sued due to the theme song being "Suicide is Painless".
No but the new Ozzy will say it.
Kevin Koch wrote to Ron Lauzon <=-
Both left and right need each other..
So when is FB going to ban Tucker Carlson for violating its policy?
I thought they already banned him? They should! Because Facebook is a Democrat
organization and Tucker Carlson is a conservative organization.
Facebook's not for conservatives.
And when is Fox News going to fire Tucker Carson? If it is all LL>aboutratings, both are failing miserably.
For Facebook, banning Tucker is good for business.
For Fox News, keeping Tucker around is good for business.
I have no idea what "liberal douch policies" are, or might be.
Believe in yourself - you know more about them than I do.
This is a fight between the Socialist Elites and everyone else.
The Elites have been around for along time. They've always believed that they are born rulers and should be in charge because everyone else is
just an idiot. Never mind that these Elites's lives (and bank accounts) are total messes. But they never let facts get in the way of their
belief in superiority.
I need to start filling out Neilson TV ratings again..
And Jewelry TV would be number 1 . :D
For Fox News, keeping Tucker around is good for business.
And continue to lose revenue? Losing revenue is never good
for business.
I need to start filling out Neilson TV ratings again..
And Jewelry TV would be number 1 . :D
I wanna be a Neilson! How do I sign up?
I need to start filling out Neilson TV ratings again..
And Jewelry TV would be number 1 . :D
I wanna be a Neilson! How do I sign up?
| Sysop: | Gate Keeper |
|---|---|
| Location: | Shelby, NC |
| Users: | 835 |
| Nodes: | 20 (0 / 20) |
| Uptime: | 76:34:27 |
| Calls: | 14,554 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 5,294 |
| Messages: | 664,034 |