• NYT Words of Wisdom

    From Lee Lofaso@2:203/2 to All on Tuesday, October 27, 2020 19:29:31
    Hello Everybody,

    The same Constitution that says Republicans can confirm Barrett weeks
    before the election, that allows them to retroactively impose a new
    and novel partisan requirement (same-party control of the Senate) on
    judicial confirmations, also says Congress can add as many seats to
    the Supreme Court as it wishes. It says Congress can strip the Supreme
    Court of its jurisdiction to hear certain kinds of cases. It says the
    judiciary is as subject to “checks and balances” as any other
    institution in American government and that the people through
    their elected officials have the right to discipline a court that
    works against their will.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/13/opinion/barrett-biden-mcconnell.html


    Lemme see if I got this right -

    * The Congress can expand the Supreme Court to whatever number it
    wants. Or do nothing, thus allowing the President to keep adding as
    many justices to the Supreme Court as he/she sees fit.

    * The Congress can limit the jurisdiction the Supreme Court has
    on certain issues. Or whatever issues the Congress decides to limit
    the Supreme Court to.

    * The Congress can cut funds. Thus limiting the justices of the
    Supreme Court to writing their opinions in crayon.

    * The Congress can expand or limit other federal courts. Or simply
    dissolve it, thus saving lots of taxpayer dollars.

    * All the US Constitution says is there has to be a Supreme Court.
    No mention is made as to number of justices. Although there would have
    to be a chief justice, as there must be at least one justice to make
    up a Supreme Court.

    --Lee

    --
    Whose streets? / Our streets!

    --- MesNews/1.08.05.00-gb
    * Origin: news://eljaco.se (2:203/2)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:229/426 to Lee Lofaso on Tuesday, October 27, 2020 16:02:21
    No mention is made as to number of justices. Although there would have
    to be a chief justice, as there must be at least one justice to make
    up a Supreme Court.

    After all that effort, why try to fight it?

    Republicans gonna do anything and everything we can to get some balance between left & right. One-party rule in the USSC (Democrat) would mute conservative voices completely.

    But Trump is still president - want him to fill er up?

    --- Renegade vY2Ka2
    * Origin: Joey, do you like movies about gladiators? (1:229/426)
  • From Lee Lofaso@2:203/2 to Aaron Thomas on Wednesday, October 28, 2020 12:33:52
    Hello Aaron,

    No mention is made as to number of justices. Although there would have
    to be a chief justice, as there must be at least one justice to make
    up a Supreme Court.

    After all that effort, why try to fight it?

    Republicans gonna do anything and everything we can to get some balance between left & right. One-party rule in the USSC (Democrat) would mute conservative voices completely.

    But Trump is still president - want him to fill er up?

    Sure.
    Why not?
    7 Catholics, 2 Jews.
    How many more handmaids you want?

    --Lee

    --
    We Put Big Loads In Tight Places

    --- MesNews/1.08.05.00-gb
    * Origin: news://eljaco.se (2:203/2)