Jeff Thiele wrote to Ron Lauzon <=-
And you're mysogynistic, to boot.
Standard Leftie response. Just accuse, with no evidence or argument.
You mean, like you accused VP Harris of "sleeping her way to the top," with no evidence or argument?
The military is the most basic example. We all pay taxes, ostensibly according to our abilities, and we all benefit from having a military, according to our needs. And then there's the highway system, the postal system, police and fire protection, and on and on.
The evidence is that you pointed out something unflattering about the Dem VP that also has truth to it. That makes you a bad man... a *very* bad man!And you're mysogynistic, to boot.Standard Leftie response. Just accuse, with no evidence or argument.
You mean, like you accused VP Harris of "sleeping her way to the top," w no evidence or argument?Her relationship with Willie Brown who, in turn, gave her a start in politics, is public knowledge.
The military is the most basic example. We all pay taxes, ostensibly according to our abilities, and we all benefit from having a military, according to our needs. And then there's the highway system, the postal system, police and fire protection, and on and on.A government using taxes to provide defense and infrastructure <> socialism.
A government using taxes to redistibute wealth = a government leaning towards/flirting with socialism.
Mike Powell wrote to Ron Lauzon <=-
The evidence is that you pointed out something unflattering about the
Dem VP that also has truth to it. That makes you a bad man... a *very* bad man!
@MSGID: <60CA162C.10306.politicf@capitolcityonline.net>
@REPLY: <60CA0A2D.10302.politicf@capitolcityonline.net>
On 16 Jun 2021, Mike Powell said the following...
The military is the most basic example. We all pay taxes, ostensibly according to our abilities, and we all benefit from having a military, according to our needs. And then there's the highway system, the postalA government using taxes to provide defense and infrastructure <> socialism.
system, police and fire protection, and on and on.
A government using taxes to redistibute wealth = a government leaning towards/flirting with socialism.
Since we don't all pay the same amount in taxes to support the military, isn't that a redistribution of wealth? That's not something you can conveniently ignore.
Except it's not all you're making it out to be. Yes, they had a relationship, but there is no evidence that Brown "gave her a start in politics." She did not work for Brown, and insisted on keeping his name out of her political aspirations.
Have you got anything more concrete to back up this claim?
The evidence is that you pointed out something unflattering about the Dem VP that also has truth to it. That makes you a bad man... a *very* bad man!
There's no worse a crime to a Leftie as showing that the Narrative is false.
Since we don't all pay the same amount in taxes to support the military, isn't that a redistribution of wealth? That's not something you can conveniently ignore.We pay income taxes based on our income level. Seeing as how you need MONEY to "(use) taxes to provide defense and infrastructure," I am not sure where you are going there unless you believe people will provide those services for free, or if you believe that we shouldn't bases taxes on income level?
You are really grasping at a very distant, far out of your reach straw there.
[...]Except it's not all you're making it out to be. Yes, they had a relation but there is no evidence that Brown "gave her a start in politics." She not work for Brown, and insisted on keeping his name out of her politica aspirations.
Have you got anything more concrete to back up this claim?
She did not "work for" Brown, but was appointed to two political posts by him. So, I stand by my "gave her a start in politics" claim. If she was not involved with him, I doubt she'd have gotten anywhere in politics and certainly wouldn't be VP right now. She is Monica Lewinsky with
political ambition.
Mike Powell wrote to Ron Lauzon <=-
There's no worse a crime to a Leftie as showing that the Narrative is false.
We will see how he backs around it now that I have given him a link.
On 06-17-21 19:12, Jeff Thiele <=-
spoke to Mike Powell about Re: Socialism <=-
Nevertheless, the fact remains that we all pay different amounts
according to our ability. It doesn't matter if I believe it should work differently; that's the way it works.
Nevertheless, the fact remains that we all pay different amounts according to our ability. It doesn't matter if I believe it should wo differently; that's the way it works.Actually, it would be great if that was the way it really worked.
However, there are people who make one thousand times the income as you
or I, but who pay less taxes -- even 0 taxes.
Nevertheless, the fact remains that we all pay different amounts
according to our ability. It doesn't matter if I believe it should work
differently; that's the way it works.
Actually, it would be great if that was the way it really worked.
However, there are people who make one thousand times the income as you
or I, but who pay less taxes -- even 0 taxes.
Arthur C. Clarke was a very gifted writer.
Named his creation after a major US corporation that is so big
it never had to pay any taxes. Did you catch the joke?
Arthur C. Clarke was a very gifted writer.
Named his creation after a major US corporation that is so big
it never had to pay any taxes. Did you catch the joke?
As an aside, I'm currently reading "The Soul Of A New Machine" by Tracy Kidder. It follows the development of Data General's 32-bit answer to the DEC
VAX, from the point of view of the underdog.
When Data General set out to develop such a machine, they split their engineers into two teams. One would continue to support and enchance the 16-bit Eclipse/Nova line, while the other would develop the new 32-bit machine. The engineers for the new project were headquartered in a suite at
the Fountainhead Apartments, and the code name for their project became FHP,
for the "Fountainhead Project."
Meanwhile, the Eclipse/Nova team were not content supporting a soon-to-be-obsolete line of computers, and also wanted to develop a 32-bit machine. In keeping with their mandate to support the 16-bit line, they decided to make a 32-bit machine that was also backward compatible with all
of the 16-bit Eclipse/Nova software. Much the same as HAL added one to each
letter in IBM, they subtracted one from each letter in FHP to produce EGO, and that became the code name for their project.
Unfortunately and yet somewhat understandably, Data General management nixed
this idea and the EGO project was no more. The team decided to proceed with
it anyway, keeping its details secret from management, and gave this new endeavor the code name "Eagle." The rest is history.
As a side-side note, I'm reading this because I'm also reading "The PDP-8 Class Project, Or Resoling An Old Machine" by Tom Almy, an obvious play on the title of "The Soul Of A New Machine." This book details the implementation of a PDP-8 architecture on an FPGA, and I'm working on just such a project.
My BBS is currently running Mystic on a Raspberry Pi, but in
the spirit of the "Cold War Computing" name, I think it would be more appropriate to run it on something a little more appropriate to the Cold War
timeframe. Considering that I'm no system designer, the PDP-8 is simple enough that I think I can do it. As a bonus, the PDP-8 is a 12-bit machine that stores two 6-bit characters per word, which means that there isn't room
in the character set for lowercase letters... AND THIS WILL BE A PERFECTLY LEGITIMATE EXCUSE FOR ME TO START YELLING AT EVERYONE! MUAHAHAHAHA!
As an aside, I'm currently reading "The Soul Of A New Machine" by Tra Kidder. It follows the development of Data General's 32-bit answer to DECFormer Army intelligence officer, won a Pulitzer for his book,
VAX, from the point of view of the underdog.
published in 1981. Definitely on my reading list.
Ironically, Edson DeCastro, the founder and CEO of Data General who nixed the EGO project, was the project leader of the PDP-8 team at DEC, and left DEC to form Data General when DEC management turned down his idea for a 16-bitUnfortunately and yet somewhat understandably, Data General managemen nixed
this idea and the EGO project was no more. The team decided to procee with
it anyway, keeping its details secret from management, and gave this endeavor the code name "Eagle." The rest is history.
As a side-side note, I'm reading this because I'm also reading "The P Class Project, Or Resoling An Old Machine" by Tom Almy, an obvious pl the title of "The Soul Of A New Machine." This book details the implementation of a PDP-8 architecture on an FPGA, and I'm working on such a project.Following in the footsteps of giants?
enough that I think I can do it. As a bonus, the PDP-8 is a 12-bit ma that stores two 6-bit characters per word, which means that there isn roomARE YOU DEAF? NOBODY CAN SHOUT LOUDER THAN THE DONALD! NOBODY!
in the character set for lowercase letters... AND THIS WILL BE A PERF LEGITIMATE EXCUSE FOR ME TO START YELLING AT EVERYONE! MUAHAHAHAHA!
When I look up "Nordic model," what is displayed mentions "capitalism," "social programs," and "wealth redistribution." While that last one is a red flag, to me, of a socialist tendency, no where did the article mention "socialism."
Look at you? Talking about socialism the way you are. Sweden is in fact, very pro-capitalism, but does have redistribution through taxes. Personal income is
taxed at a rate of 61.85 percent, plus a 7 percent social security tax rate fo
employees. On top of these taxes, Sweden also has
a 25 percent consumption tax.
Sweden is in fact, very pro-capitalism,
Exactly. That's obviously what some of you can't understand about *real* so
alism.
When I look up "Nordic model," what is displayed mentions "capitalism "social programs," and "wealth redistribution." While that last one red flag, to me, of a socialist tendency, no where did the article me "socialism."
That's just it. While y'all use the word socialism as a pejorative,
you don't understand what it really means. I.e. all the above, and then some.
Sorry but your country isn't socalist and social programs and a welfare state isn't socialism. Socialism is when the government owns the means
of production. Like Venezuela. High tax/high services is simply that.
When I look up "Nordic model," what is displayed mentions "capitalism," >MP> "social programs," and "wealth redistribution." While that last one is a >MP> red flag, to me, of a socialist tendency, no where did the article mention >MP> "socialism."
That's just it. While y'all use the word socialism as a pejorative, you don't >understand what it really means. I.e. all the above, and then some.
If you were taught unbiased political science at school, you'd have a bette
understanding of how bad your society is for everyone but the filthy rich, and
hat enormous benefits it would be for you if you abandoned your corporate capi
lism and tried social capitalism for a change.
I do not want to have to work the rest of my life, paying heavier
taxes, so that someone else who is not contributing *by choice* benefits from my employment.
You can call that selfish, but I call it practical. I want to enjoy my old
age, not die working.
Sysop: | Gate Keeper |
---|---|
Location: | Shelby, NC |
Users: | 719 |
Nodes: | 20 (0 / 20) |
Uptime: | 164:24:14 |
Calls: | 9,280 |
Files: | 5,288 |
D/L today: |
3 files (151K bytes) |
Messages: | 467,313 |