It makes sense that Synchronet would consider "admin" to be me, but it seems that someone was able to create a new user account with the name/handle as "admin".
Eric Oulashin wrote to GitLab note in main/sbbs <=-
<SNIP>
It makes sense that Synchronet would consider "admin" to be me,
but it seems that someone was able to create a new user account
with the name/handle as "admin".
Strange, that shouldn't be possible assuming "admin" is in your ../text/name.can file (it is there by default).
but it seems that someone was able to create a new user account
with the name/handle as "admin".
Strange, that shouldn't be possible assuming "admin" is in your ../text/name.can file (it is there by default).
Digital Man wrote to Gamgee <=-
It makes sense that Synchronet would consider "admin" to be me,
but it seems that someone was able to create a new user account
with the name/handle as "admin".
Strange, that shouldn't be possible assuming "admin" is in your ../text/name.can file (it is there by default).
That wasn't always the case though: https://gitlab.synchro.net/main/sbbs/-/commits/master/text/name.can
If a sysop's SBBS install is 11+ years old, they wouldn't have
"admin" in there (and many other diallowed user names).
Nightfox wrote to Gamgee <=-
but it seems that someone was able to create a new user account
with the name/handle as "admin".
Strange, that shouldn't be possible assuming "admin" is in your ../text/name.can file (it is there by default).
It's not in my name.can. I've been using Synchronet since 2007,
and maybe "admin" was added to name.can some time after I started
using it?
I've added it now though.
| Sysop: | Gate Keeper |
|---|---|
| Location: | Shelby, NC |
| Users: | 820 |
| Nodes: | 20 (0 / 20) |
| Uptime: | 183:22:56 |
| Calls: | 13,718 |
| Files: | 5,294 |
| Messages: | 621,977 |