• ShutSentry virtual dead-man-switch for Linux has been released

    From ShutSentry@shutsentry@nospam.com to alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,alt.privacy on Saturday, December 05, 2020 12:05:06
    From Newsgroup: alt.privacy


    https://gitlab.com/shutsentry/shutsentry


    ShutSentry for Linux has been released today, with most of the same
    features and functions of its Windows counterpart released last year.

    ShutSentry is a virtual dead-man-switch that protects computers from unauthorized physical access, by presenting an on-screen challenge
    prompt at regular time intervals. If the correct password is not
    entered, the system is locked and then optionally shut down after a
    specified delay. It can also respond to USB device changes on the host
    system and challenge upon attachment/detachment of any device.

    All code is fully free and open source, and all questions, issues,
    comments, suggestions and concerns will be addressed if possible.
    --- Synchronet 3.18b-Win32 NewsLink 1.113
  • From J.O. Aho@user@example.net to alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,alt.privacy on Saturday, December 05, 2020 18:52:05
    From Newsgroup: alt.privacy

    On 05/12/2020 18.05, ShutSentry wrote:

    ShutSentry is a virtual dead-man-switch that protects computers from unauthorized physical access

    script stopped working after
    killall -9 shutsentry.sh

    --

    //Aho

    --- Synchronet 3.18b-Win32 NewsLink 1.113
  • From ShutSentry@shutsentry@nospam.com to alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,alt.privacy on Saturday, December 05, 2020 13:04:13
    From Newsgroup: alt.privacy

    On 12/5/20 12:52 PM, J.O. Aho wrote:
    On 05/12/2020 18.05, ShutSentry wrote:

    ShutSentry is a virtual dead-man-switch that protects computers from
    unauthorized physical access

    script stopped working after
    killall -9 shutsentry.sh



    There are basically two approaches to counteracting the forcible
    termination of the script with kill/all.

    1) Run the script as another user from the command line, whether that
    user be root or another arbitrary user created for this purpose. That
    way the normal logged-on non-root user won't have permission to
    terminate it. su root -c "shutsentry.sh"

    2) A more hackneyed and less optimal solution is to use the feature
    within the program "Guard main program process". This will create a
    handful of clone processes that monitor the main process for abnormal termination, and trigger an instant shutdown if detected.

    When testing the second option, give the program a good 30 seconds or so
    after startup before terminating it to generate all the clones. This
    approach is of course not as effective as option 1 since if someone is specifically looking for them, the clones could be discovered and
    terminated too. But in the event running as another user isn't possible
    for some reason, it's better than nothing.
    --- Synchronet 3.18b-Win32 NewsLink 1.113
  • From R. Mutt@R.Mutt@da.da to alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,alt.privacy on Sunday, December 06, 2020 03:18:29
    From Newsgroup: alt.privacy

    ShutSentry <shutsentry@nospam.com> wrote:

    https://gitlab.com/shutsentry/shutsentry


    ShutSentry for Linux has been released today, with most of the same
    features and functions of its Windows counterpart released last year.

    ShutSentry is a virtual dead-man-switch that protects computers from unauthorized physical access, by presenting an on-screen challenge
    prompt at regular time intervals. If the correct password is not
    entered, the system is locked and then optionally shut down after a
    specified delay. It can also respond to USB device changes on the host
    system and challenge upon attachment/detachment of any device.

    All code is fully free and open source, and all questions, issues,
    comments, suggestions and concerns will be addressed if possible.


    Are you associated with ShutSentry developers?

    --- Synchronet 3.18b-Win32 NewsLink 1.113
  • From ShutSentry@shutsentry@nospam.com to alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,alt.privacy on Saturday, December 05, 2020 22:39:53
    From Newsgroup: alt.privacy

    On 12/5/20 10:18 PM, R. Mutt wrote:


    Are you associated with ShutSentry developers?


    Yes, this is the dev team account posting.

    --- Synchronet 3.18b-Win32 NewsLink 1.113
  • From gazelle@gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) to alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,alt.privacy on Sunday, December 06, 2020 09:47:36
    From Newsgroup: alt.privacy

    In article <5fcc4d85$0$34878$a92e2ab9@news.vipernews.com>,
    R. Mutt <R.Mutt@da.da> wrote:
    ...
    Are you associated with ShutSentry developers?

    Of course he is. I don't think that was ever a secret.

    I know what you are implying - but it is a stupid implication.

    It's no big secret nowadays that most "product announcements" on Internet forums are just that - product announcements, written by the people who
    produce the stuff (and will benefit, in one way or another, from your
    showing interest in their product).

    Nothing to get your panties in a twist about.

    --
    He continues to assert that 2 plus 2 equals 4, despite being repeatedly
    told otherwise.
    --- Synchronet 3.18b-Win32 NewsLink 1.113
  • From J.O. Aho@user@example.net to alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,alt.privacy on Sunday, December 06, 2020 11:45:38
    From Newsgroup: alt.privacy


    On 06/12/2020 10.47, Kenny McCormack wrote:
    In article <5fcc4d85$0$34878$a92e2ab9@news.vipernews.com>,
    R. Mutt <R.Mutt@da.da> wrote:
    ...
    Are you associated with ShutSentry developers?

    Of course he is. I don't think that was ever a secret.

    I know what you are implying - but it is a stupid implication.

    It's no big secret nowadays that most "product announcements" on Internet forums are just that - product announcements

    If they just managed to stay on the forums, but ...

    --

    //Aho
    --- Synchronet 3.18b-Win32 NewsLink 1.113
  • From R. Mutt@R.Mutt@da.da to alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,alt.privacy on Sunday, December 06, 2020 19:49:29
    From Newsgroup: alt.privacy

    ShutSentry <shutsentry@nospam.com> wrote:
    On 12/5/20 10:18 PM, R. Mutt wrote:


    Are you associated with ShutSentry developers?


    Yes, this is the dev team account posting.

    Perhaps you might want to consider signing your messages. I see that you’re using Thunderbird and I think it supports both OpenPGP and S/MIME.

    --- Synchronet 3.18b-Win32 NewsLink 1.113
  • From R. Mutt@R.Mutt@da.da to alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,alt.privacy on Sunday, December 06, 2020 19:49:29
    From Newsgroup: alt.privacy

    Kenny McCormack <gazelle@shell.xmission.com> wrote:
    In article <5fcc4d85$0$34878$a92e2ab9@news.vipernews.com>,
    R. Mutt <R.Mutt@da.da> wrote:
    ...
    Are you associated with ShutSentry developers?

    Of course he is. I don't think that was ever a secret.

    I know what you are implying - but it is a stupid implication.

    I’m not sure I understand what are you talking about.

    It's no big secret nowadays that most "product announcements" on Internet forums are just that - product announcements, written by the people who produce the stuff (and will benefit, in one way or another, from your
    showing interest in their product).

    Nothing to get your panties in a twist about.

    ???

    --- Synchronet 3.18b-Win32 NewsLink 1.113