• Who Will PAY For CrowdStrike Outage ?

    From 186282@ud0s4.net@186283@ud0s4.net to talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.security,comp.os.linux.misc,alt.survival on Monday, August 05, 2024 00:36:46
    From Newsgroup: alt.security

    http://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20240804050198

    Crowdstrike did not have a good day on July 19. During
    a routine software update, the file that the cybersecurity
    firm issued triggered a logic error that prohibited Windows
    machines from rebooting. Microsoft estimates that around
    8.5 million computers may have been affected by the event.

    This created a tsunami of downstream consequences, as
    computers that supported numerous industry operations
    were unable to coordinate and process data.

    For air travel, the net effect was the cancellation of
    more than 10,000 flights since July 19, as reported by
    FlightAware, with Delta Air Lines particularly hit hard.
    Using very conservative estimates, if each flight was
    booked on average with 64 people, and the average cost
    of a ticket was $290, the lost direct revenue on these
    days totaled more than $180 million.

    . . .

    Look, this is a good question.

    Be it mere random error or unhappy employee or even
    Russian tampering - the global computer outage rang
    up a GIGANTIC bill. A full day, or two or three, of
    NO BUSINESS across the globe.

    M$ itself was hacked just a few days ago, in a
    separate incident, again causing long down-times
    for its products. This time it was clearly someone
    who fully understood the M$ plan to deal with
    Denial-Of-Services attacks who turned that plan
    AGAINST them, causing far LARGER denials. Insider ?
    Russia ? China ? Might never know.

    In each case however, the impacts caused a HUGE
    loss of biz revenue. So WHO PAYS ??? No insurer
    can possibly cover something of this scale, nor
    can private companies.

    I'd suggest most biz turn to Unix/Linux ... they
    are MORE resistant - but, remember, not TOTALLY
    resistant. Smart criminals/hacks/disgruntled CAN
    find ways to do damage - directly or indirectly.

    CrowdStrike, and before that SolarWinds, were what
    would be called "indirect" attacks ... sneaky code
    in 3rd-party 'security'/'convenience' software.
    Yea yea ... they'll PROMISE to be perfect but,
    really, it's pretty much bullshit.

    What's LEFT of corporate/govt IT departments will
    continue to rely on these 3rd-party fixes because
    then they can blame SOMEONE ELSE when things go
    horribly wrong. Butt-covering rules all ....
    --- Synchronet 3.21e-Win32 NewsLink 1.2