From Newsgroup: alt.society.civil-liberty

The Prime Minister
Mr Tony Blair
10 Downing Street
London SW1A 2AA.

STATEMENT OF TRUTH.

The Statements that I the undersigned, Maurice Kellett, make herein below
are true to the best of my knowledge and belief.

In 1986 in learned of crime that was being carried on at the then North East
UK National Coal Board Estates Department, at Spennymoor, Co Durham. I was affected by it and pressed the matter with the management. Facts suggested
that at least one of them was involved with it. After I would not drop the matter I was battered and then struck by a car that was deliberately driven
at me by a man named Robert Willis Gardner Pringle. That same night
Northumbria Police officers left me with no choice but to crawl most of the five or so miles to my home in the middle of the night during torrential
rain. I was bleeding heavily from my injuries and the police doctor had no bandages whatsoever to help stem that. Police refused me hospital treatment. When I arrived home that morning a doctor attended me and confirmed that I
had required it. He made a diagram of the injuries to my body that remains
on my medical notes.

The First Use Of Crime Carried Out Against Me By Houghton-le-Spring,
Tyne-Wear, Magistrates Court.

The matter detailed above went to Houghton-le-Spring, Tyne-Wear, Magistrates Court, UK. One of the sitting magistrates, Mr. William Moseley, in regular attendance at Hetton-le-Hole Masonic Hall, was a very close acquaintance of Pringle and I too had been friendly with him having obtained him work for
his garage business. The case was dismissed by the court. When I approached
Mr Moseley at his home on that same evening, he claimed that he had stood
down from judgement in the Pringle affair. That despite it now being known
that magistrates generally get several days prior warning of cases listed to
be heard before them Much later a police officer told me that the Houghton Magistrates Court proceedings had been illegal. He said that that the
remaining sitting magistrate, who had sat with Moseley on the bench, had no qualifications to act alone. The fact of that has of late again been
confirmed by a senior police officer. The manager of that court, a Mr
Bavidge and the Lord Chancellors Department were parties to ignoring and attempting to cover up of the matter of those illegal Magistrates Court Proceedings. I have continued to pursue it without success. Northumbria
Police have done their utmost to avoid investigating that matter throughout
the years since.


First Durham County Court Serious Crime Used Against me.
Deputy District Judge Baird, November 1993.

In November of 1993 I and on behalf of my wife, Joyce Kellett, appealed at
the Durham County Court in the matter of a judgement made by District Judge Scott-Phillips. It related to damage to our property following a vehicle collision with it. My appeal against District Judge Scott-Phillips ruling
was heard by Deputy District Judge Baird who refused it. I learned that a Deputy District Judge is not permitted by law to hear any appeal. Eventually the Durham County Court admitted that fact. That admission came only after I had pressed the matter with the Court and it had clearly attempted to cover
up it up. When it was clear to the Court that I would not let the matter go, the Court wrote that my appeal had been heard by the wrong judge in error.
That was a lame excuse. All judges and indeed solicitors generally, are well aware that it is illegal for a Deputy District Judge, as Baird was, to hear
any Appeal. It was eventually lawfully heard by a Circuit Judge who upheld
it. Deputy District Judge Baird had in the circumstances, carried out a
serious crime against me by unlawfully hearing my Appeal. It was clear afterwards that in that matter, It had been heard before a man who had
carried out serious judicial criminal deception against me. It is also considered that the crime of Misconduct in Public Office is also of
relevance. No action was taken on that matter by either the Durham County
Court or any of the relevant Authorities that I reported it to. Those
Included Durham Constabulary who were later to refuse to accept any evidence concerning serious crime that had been carried out by Miss Shirley Carr, Solicitor Alison Stott and the Durham District Land Registry.

Newcastle County Court March 1994.

Deputy District Judge Baird.

In March of 1994 I was accused by my next door neighbour, Miss Shirley Carr,
of 16 the Lyons, Hetton-le-Hole, Tyne-Wear, who was employed as a National Insurance Investigator, of being a trespasser on land which both I and my father had been in possession of for over twenty seven years. The original owner of it could not and never was traced. There was no adverse claim made against us throughout that full period of our occupation. In accordance with the Law we had in those circumstances become the lawful owners of it. The
first hearing of my alleged trespass on that land was before Deputy District Judge Baird. I had of course previously exposed him, as detailed above, for
his previous use of Criminal Deception which he had used against me. Unfortunately I had not recognised or associated him at that time as being
the same criminal judge who had been primarily involved with my appeal at Durham County Court a few months earlier. Though I was in need of her assistance in the judges chambers, D.J. Baird refused my wife access to
them. They were situated at the Newcastle County Court. He allowed Carr two representatives or advocates into his Chambers. One of them was Professor Kenny, who was said to be a regular contributor to The Law Society Journal.
He would have been well aware that by speaking on the case as Baird had
invited him to do was to say the least very improper. He had also paid Carr
a visit at her home one Sunday afternoon which was not within the normal working ours of his employment. Both were employed at the University of Northumbria Law Clinic. Carr was in those circumstances unlawfully allowed
the use of two advocates. DDJ Baird ignored my irrefutable evidence provided
to him that I had not been a trespasser and ruled in the favour of Carr. DDJ Baird had shown in November 1992 that he was guilty of Criminal Deception. Having a second crack of the whip to pay me back for exposing his crime
would all appear to fit in with his character.

Shirley Carr has never been able to substantiate what is shown to have been
her false allegation that I, or indeed my father in the circumstances, were trespassers on the land in question. She simply had no entitlement to the
land whatsoever. Recorder John H Fryer Spedding ruled that fact in October 1996. That despite his numerous acts, many of which are evidenced by his own approved transcript of judgement, were clearly meant to pervert the course
of justice. A summary examination by anyone with even slight legal expertise would be able to confirm that. Despite that ruling, The Chief Registrar of
the Durham District Land Registry ignored that ruling and unlawfully allowed Carr to register our land subject of Newcastle County Court case NE401650
into Carr's name. Following my meeting with Mr Timothy late last year (2002)
I am satisfied that he too is a mason.

In March 1994 I took out a civil action against Carr at the Durham County Court. That followed her refusal to name the people who had carried out the re-roofing of her property in late 1993 (Durham County Court case No: DH400898.) That work had been commenced on a Saturday morning and had been completed by the following Sunday evening. What was the reason that work was done on a weekend? They had caused damage to our house during that work and had also refused to identify themselves to us so that the normal course of
law could be pursued. I also took out an action for damage being caused to
our property following steps having been taken by Carr to ensure that our property received drainage coming from her adjoining property (Durham County Court case DH400950). It had no drainage facilities at the rear of it. It is clear that she had purchased that property at a reduced price because it had
no working drains on it. My Durham County Court cases No. DH400950 and
DH400898 along with Carr's Newcastle County case No. NE401650 continued. On June 1st 1994 Shirley Carr's application to the Durham County Court for consolidation of the cases into her case NE401650 was heard before District Judge Scott-Phillips. He refused her application and Ordered that the above cases could not be subject of consolidation. His Order was never subject of Appeal and stood at the time Recorder John H Fryer-Spedding falsely alleged that the cases had been subject of consolidation. Then he unlawfully tried
them that way as a consolidated case under Carr's case No: NE401650. My two prosecution cases DH400950, and my defence case in NE401650 had been
prepared under the Order made on the 1st June 1994 refusing consolidation, mentioned above, of the cases. In the event, my case notes were of little
use. However, recorder John H Fryer Spedding had warned me that my pointing
out to him that Carr had commenced to swear perjury will she was under my
cross examination, would do me no good. He also agreed that it was his intention to deprive me of my rights. The latter statement is agreed in his approved transcript of judgement. It is not difficult to see from the
available catalogue of events, details of which are all readily available,
that he had the prior intention that I would be his victim.


The authorities who were made aware of that criminal act by Spedding, along with a catalogue of his other crimes used to defeat my cases, ignored it. As
a further example of recorder John H Fryer-Spedding's perversion of the
course of justice, he said that my right of way across the garden purchased
by Carr had come to an end because that right had not been reserved in the conveyance of it to Carr. One of the most commonly used sections of law used
in the conveyance of property is Section 62 of The Law of Property Act 1925 where included in it is all rights, easements, appurtenances, privileges
etc. etc. are deemed to be conveyed with a property unless specifically
revoked in it. That had not happened. Indeed the opposite was true because
the vendors of that property had been my own parents. My father swore an affidavit agreeing the fact that our right of way was not revoked. That was only one part of the large amount of evidence that Spedding ignored.
Recorder John H Fryer-Spedding also falsely alleged that we had required a thirty year term to obtain a title by adverse possession of the land subject
of case NE401650. That was only another of his many lies. Only the twelve
year period was in question and we had well exceeded that term anyway.


Recorder John H Fryer-Spedding was alleged to have been a judge with
Chancery experience. I cannot think that such experience which had allowed
him to make such untrue statements, had come from any Court of Law that I
know of. Spedding agreed these statement in his approved transcript of judgement. Video evidence taken at the time our land subject of case
NE401650 was fenced from the garden owned by Carr was shown to Spedding. His statements regarding what was shown in it bore nothing whatsoever to the
truth of what he was shown in it. Newcastle County Court refused me access
to the tape recordings made at the kangaroo court held by Spedding there in October 1996. That served as evidence of their part in the attempted cover
up of Spedding's crime used against me. People who ignored these facts and many others showing Spedding's crimes included Lord Justices Auld and Pill, The Court Service, The Home Office, The Parliamentary Commissioner and the Attorney General. This has clearly been a situation where Establishment
crime was, and remains as being protected by yet more Establishment crime.
The fact that recorder John H Fryer-Spedding had consistently lied and that
is shown and proved by his own approved transcript of judgement, there is no doubt. His reasons for having done that to me remains in some doubt.
However, I am sure that it had been his reward for me having contributed to
the House of Commons Home Affairs Select Committee Inquiry into Freemasonry within the Police and judiciary ( Nolan Inquiry).

I obtained from Sunderland Local Authority substantial evidence that Carr
had sworn very material perjury in her court submissions in the matter of
case DH400950. Then she applied for an injunction clearly to deter me from seeking and taking further evidence of her crime. The injunction application was heard by District Judge Cuthbertson sitting at the Durham County Court
in September 1995. D.J. Cuthbertson agreed that solicitor Alison Stott be allowed to prepare the draft of joint undertakings agreed between Carr and I
in general principle. He then adjourned the proceedings without making it
known when those proceedings were to recommence. In January 1996 solicitor Alison Stott declared to the Newcastle County Court chaired by recorder John
H Fryer-Spedding that up to that day she had not in fact been acting for
Carr but had only been assisting her. In those same circumstances alone, as Carr's assistant, solicitor Stott was party to criminal deception by failing
to declare to the Durham County Court she was even at that time only Carr's assistant and had not been her advocate. That was not the least of her use
of crimes against me. I will detail some of the others later in this
document. Stott's declaration to the Newcastle County Court in January 1996 mentioned above, was in fact an acknowledge of her serious use of crime.
That same very serious crime was reported to Durham Constabulary and The
Office For The Supervision of Solicitors who simply ignored it.

Two days after the injunction hearing before DJ Cuthbertson, my wife and I, received a copy of an Order made by DJ Cuthbertson granting all that Carr
had applied for in her injunction application. I appealed against that
Order. My Appeal was again heard by D.J. Cuthbertson who refused it. In the circumstances that Appeal too had been illegal. A judge is not permitted by
law to hear any appeal from his own judgement. I never accepted the lawful validity of DJ Cuthbertson's Order. In June of 1996 I was accused of having been in breach of DJ Cuthbertson's injunction Order. Part of his Order was
that I was not allowed to speak to Carr. After that Order had been granted
Carr falsely claimed to the Sunderland Public Health Department that our
two dogs barked incessantly which was only another of her many lies. Shortly after that while sat in our garden, one of our dogs started to bark at
noises coming from the adjoining fence between Carr's property and our own. When it carried on, I put some steps up against the fence and looked over
it. There I saw Carr with something in her hand and scratching it against
the fence. In her other hand was a microphone. It was clear even then what
her intention had been. I called her some appropriate names in my outrage.
She obviously tape recorded at least part of that. She had however edited
part of that recording to her advantage. Evidence provided by Carr to the Courts, showed that she had secretly tape recorded a conversation between my wife and I while we sat in the privacy of our own kitchen. It had been done
by her placing a microphone up to the open window. In July of 1995 while my wife and I had been on holiday, Mr Norman Pringle who lives with Carr, had
gone into our property and altered guttering on it to allow Carr's property drainage to flow more freely onto ours. He agreed that he had done that in
his affidavit. The results of his work were video filmed when my wife and I returned from holiday. In 1996 when my wife and I went on holiday we left a video camera pointing down the boundary fence between our property and
Carr's. It had not been in use anyway as no equipment could record for the
two weeks unattended while we were away on holiday. It had been meant as a deterrent to Pringle against trespassing and altering our property. Circuit Judge Helen Paling would I feel sure have been aware of that fact but still sentenced me to imprisonment. Later, which I will detail, she was to prove
to me her unfitness to be a judge.

An application was made in July 1996 by Carr for my imprisonment under her allegation that I had breached the injunction as in the above described circumstances, which District Judge had granted under what had been illegal circumstances. I was found guilty of that allegation at Newcastle Crown
Court by Circuit Judge Helen Paling and then sentenced to three months imprisonment at Durham. There I had a stroke and was released on appeal. My sentence was then suspended.

At the outset of the cases and around late June 1994, a solicitor by the
name of Nancy Bone practising from Durham, made an application for Legal Aid for us. It was refused on the grounds that insufficient information had been given to the Legal aid Board by her. Bone then asked us for over two
thousand pounds for having made that application. I would not pay it. In
fact there had never been any mention whatsoever by Bone of any costs for a Legal Aid application. Then she withheld all of my files by lien. I made an application to the Durham County Court which was heard before DJ Scott-Phillips, that I be allowed to visit the Offices of Bone to take
copies from my files to allow me to proceed. He granted that Order. Bone breached it and was in those circumstances guilty of Contempt of Court. She had locked me out of her offices. I contacted the Durham County Court and
was told that DJ Scott-Phillips had not granted such Order. The Court
manager. Mr I Cuthbertson said that DJ Scott-Philips had told him that my
visit to Bone's office had only been by her agreement. That was a lie but I could not prove it then. Around two years after the final hearing of the
cases before recorder John H Fryer-Spedding, Bone was struck from the
Register of Solicitors for crime/misconduct in other people's cases. Another solicitor returned my files that Bone had withheld. They included copies of letters that she had sent to the Durham County Court. In them she had
referred to my visit to her office as being by Order of the Court. That was proof that the Court and/or DJ Scott-Phillips had lied about the matter and
had protected solicitor Bone from a probable Contempt of Court conviction.

On the 1st June 1994 District Judge Scott-Phillips at the Durham County
Court Ordered that the three cases mentioned above, DH400950, DH400898 and NE401650 between Carr and I could not be subject of consolidation into one case. Solicitor Alison Stott had been going into court with Carr from late
June 1994. In 1995 she took on the work of preparing the judges bundles
ready for trial. She secretly passed on that work for Carr to carry out herself. In October 1996 recorder John H Fryer-Spedding falsely alleged that the cases had been subject of consolidation. Despite my protests he went
ahead and tried them as a single action. After three days he ruled that I
was to pay five sixth of all costs. His approved transcript of Judgement
still serves as substantial evidence that it had been his prior intent to pervert the course of justice. I have published it along with my replies to
it in Statement of Truth format. During the proceedings, he had warned me against highlighting to him that Carr was swearing perjury during my cross examination of her. Her contradictions of previous statements made on oath proved that fact. He said it would do me no good. About a week later I
reported recorder John H Fryer-Spedding's crime to then Lord Chancellor
Mackay. Spedding then went into what was shown to been a sudden decision to retire. When Carr had prepared the judges bundles, without the knowledge or consent of the Durham County Court, she later agreed that she had
deliberately left out documents which she said as not being important. One
of them was the Order made on the 1st June 1994 refusing her application for consolidation of the three actions that had, in the circumstances
unlawfully, been heard before recorder Spedding as a single action. In any event, he was required by Supreme Court rules to have seen a copy of the alleged Order for consolidation of the cases. There was none, only the Order refusing consolidation of the cases. I had prepared my two prosecution cases and one defence case as per the Order of the 1st June 1994 refusing consolidation of the cases. At what was a kangaroo court presided over by recorder Spedding I was thrown into complete disarray.

I sought leave to appeal recorder Spedding's judgement at the London High Court. It was heard before Lord's Justices Auld and Pill. I supplied them
with a huge amount of evidence showing evidence of the injustice that I was deliberately being subjected to. I also supplied them with a copy of the
Order made by District Judge Scott-Phillips at Durham on 1st June 1994
refusing Carr's application for consolidation of the three cases. That alone should have been sufficient for granting my application for leave to appeal. They refused it. In 1996/97 I had contributed to the House of Commons Home Affairs Select Committee Inquiry into Freemasonry within the Police and Judiciary. It was common knowledge I had done that. I was still at that time
in correspondence with Lord Nolan on matters concerning Freemasonry and that continued until January of 1998. He wrote then telling me that he was
returning to being a Member of the Law Lords. Lord Justice Auld spent a
large amount of the time they had allocated for my application in an attempt
to persuade me the possibility of Masonic involvement in the injustice that
had been dealt out was unlikely. I wrote to LJ Auld and Pill afterwards. I asked that Lord Justice Auld and Pill having spent so much time on the
matter of my concerns regarding Freemasonry would they in those
circumstances agree their having any membership of Freemasonry. The letter I received from their secretary was that they did not enter into
correspondence with litigants who had been before them. In fact their
failure to make such denial or admission of Masonic membership was a breach
of Article 6(1) of the European Human Rights Convention.

Solicitor Alison Stott practising from Durham, had been attending the Durham County Court from around late June 1994. In January 1996 she declared to the Newcastle County Court chaired by recorder John H Fryer Spedding that she
had not been acting for Carr but had only been assisting her. There were witnesses to her declaration and affidavits sworn relative to it. Spedding replied to her that she was either acting for Carr or she was not. Her reply was that, "well I am now sir". As Carr's assistant Stott had no legal
authority for work that she had been given by the Court in the matter of the injunction application against me in 1995 which had imprisoned me in 1996. Neither did she have any authority to take on the work of preparing the
judges bundle or indeed its authority to pass that work on for Carr to carry out. Last year 2002, Durham County Court agreed following their search of
the files, there was no authority on record to allow solicitor Stott to
prepare the judges bundle. That of course had also been true of the
situation relative to Shirley Carr. That these two people had been guilty of serious crime there is no doubt whatsoever. The mass of evidence showing
that still remains.

In March 1999 I was made bankrupt at the Durham County Court in the sum of u15.800. Included in the bankruptcy costs were solicitor Stott's costs throughout which included the time period that she was, as she had declared
in January 1996, was only Carr's assistant. My bankruptcy costs, having been engineered on a bed of crime, some of which is described here, included solicitor Stott's costs as if she had in fact been acting as Carr's advocate rather than her assistant as she had previously declared. That amounted to fraud under the Theft Act. That still needs to be investigated. Durham Constabulary are aware of that fraud but have refused to take any action on
it. Those who have made that decision are in those circumstances shown to be liable for prosecution under the Regina-v-Dytham case, for Misconduct in
Public Office. They are also held to be liable for other action. Facts and evidence showing that the final hearing of the cases before John H Fryer-Spedding had been illegal by virtue of the 1st June 1994 Order
refusing consolidation of the cases. That too was also ignored by the bankruptcy court as it had also been by Lords Justices Auld and Pill. My
appeal against that bankruptcy was refused by Mr Peter Leaver QC at the
London Appeal Court. He said that he had no interest in the evidence that I
had supplied to him which showed the sea of fraud used to engineer my bankruptcy. Part of it included the 1st June 1994 Order by the Durham County Court refusing consolidation of the cases. Mr Leaver said that he had no interest in that evidence only whether the actual bankruptcy proceedings had been legal. He added another two thousand pounds costs on for my bankruptcy appeal. Attending that appeal was Shirley Carr, solicitor Stott and
barrister Mr Richard Merritt acting for Carr. Merrit had been aware that the cases had unlawfully been heard as a consolidated action before recorder
John H Fryer-Spedding. He had in fact corrected his defence and prosecution case submission reflecting that fact when that point had been made to known
to solicitor Stott by my solicitor Mrs P. Tench a few weeks earlier. In
those circumstances solicitor Stott and barrister Mr Richard Merrit are
further implicated in the crime/misconduct used against me. It would appear
at the very least that their obligations to the duties of their profession
and to their duties as Officers of the Courts were ignored to the point that was a criminal act.

In the matter of the land subject of my alleged trespass, solicitor Stott
was in receipt of evidence that another solicitor, Mr Paul Graney, also
since struck from the register of Solicitors for crime/misconduct in other peoples cases, had sworn perjury in a Statutory Declaration which had been
used to lodge a caution on the land subject of the trespass case at the
Durham District Land Registry ( NE401650). She failed, indeed refused to
make that information known to the land Registry. Northumbria and Durham Constabulary ignored those matters even after solicitor Graney had sworn an affidavit agreeing that the information he had sworn in his Statutory Declaration used to register a caution at HM Land Registry had been untrue. Evidence by means of his own letters which came to light had proved that
fact anyway. That evidence was shown to detective sergeant McGann and
detective constable Storey at Houghton-le-Spring, Tyne-Wear, Police Station. They falsely claimed that swearing perjury was not a police matter.

Recorder John H Fryer-Spedding ruled that Carr had no entitlement to a possessory title to the land subject of my alleged trespass under case NE401650. Despite that, Mr Patrick Timothy Chief registrar of the Durham District Land Registry, who was provided with a copy of that ruling, ignored
it despite my protests. He unlawfully allowed the land subject of that
matter to registered into Carr's name. I, and my father (since deceased)
still have lawful title to that land despite it having been stolen from me
by none other than crime as a mass of evidence shows.

My father had taken an action at the Durham County Court to go back onto possession of the land sunject of case NE401650. Recorder John H Fryer
Spedding had ruled, and that is included in his approved transcript of judgement, that my father was the most likely person to have title to it.
His application was heard before District Judge Cuthbertson. D.J.
Cuthbertson ruled that my fathers application was an abuse of court time and then dismissed it. My father appealed that ruling. I represented him at the Sunderland County Court. The judge in that matter was Circuit Judge Helen Paling. She was the judge who had previously sentenced me to three months imprisonment at Durham for alleged Contempt of Court. At the outset of the hearing she told me to be quiet and then dismissed my father's appeal
without my being able to present it on his behalf. My father ran from the courtroom when I became subject of nothing short of a verbal onslaught from
CJ Helen Paling. The court usher had expressed concern about his safety following that. I wrote to the Lord Chancellor about that matter. CJ Paling made an excuse then which effectively said that it had been a mistake. It
could not have been
a mistake and that matter was never corrected by the
Court. My fathers health went downhill. He collapsed and died two days after
my bankruptcy was published front page on the local Press in April 1999. The publication had also included that I was thereafter barred from being a Town Councillor by virtue of that bankruptcy ruling. He had been very upset at
the whole affair and that was considered by a family member as being a contributory factor in his death.

I had been accused by Carr of approaching her at the Sunderland County Court and threatening harassment of her. Her accusation had been made relative to the day my fathers appeal case should have been heard by CJ Paling at the Sunderland County Court. That allegation and another she had made against me had also been untrue. I was found guilty of Carr's allegation at Houghton-le-Spring Magistrates court and received a huge fine with costs. It was that same Court who had previously carried out serious crime against me
by its illegal proceedings in 1986 mentioned above. That was a matter which
I had never let go of. It was at that time that I became sure that members
of Freemasonry had been involved in that. My appeal against that conviction
was refused. Judge Moir and two lay magistrates sitting at the Newcastle Combined Courts, had been informed a week earlier that I would require that they declare any membership of Freemasonry. After around a half hour adjournment, Judge Moir said that they would not make that declaration. Following a ruling in 2002, (Commissioners Case No: CSI/136/02) their
judgement in that matter as in the cases detailed here, is shown to have
been a breach of Article 6(1) of the European Human Rights Convention. While
I had asked that that the barrister then acting for me, Mr Neil Addison, require that same declaration from the judges sitting at the London Appeal Court in that matter, I am unsure now as to whether he had in fact made that known to the judges. I have reason to believe that he had not done that and that suggests what I know from my experience to be a general fear of mentioning anything to do with Freemasonry in our Courts.

A few months after my Appeal against conviction for alleged harassment of
Carr, I collected a file from solicitors Harding, Swinburne, Jackson & Co of Sunderland. They were the solicitors representing me in my appeal. They had kept my files for a long time after my failed appeal under their allegation that they still needed them. Eventually I went to their offices and a clerk gave them to me apparently believing it had been agreed that I could collect them. When I examined them at home, there was a copy of a letter written by
Mr Head, Senior Prosecutor of the Washington, Tyne-Wear Crown Prosecution Service. He had written it to my former solicitors, Jackson's of Hartlepool, Co. Cleveland. It read that a security officer, a Mr Michael Golding, who
was on duty in the Sunderland County Court at the time of the allegation
made against me by Carr and had been spoken to by police. The letter said
that Mr Golding had told Northumbria Police that nothing of note had
occurred in the court at the time Carr had made that allegation of my threatening harassment of her. That letter was never submitted in my
defence evidence in my prosecution or during my appeals against it
afterwards. Northumbria Police agreed that the evidence of that letter was material to my defence and that it had been a criminal act to deliberately withhold it from the courts. They agreed to investigate that and other
matters of crime used against me, including the matter of the illegal
Houghton Magistrates Court proceedings in 1986. They have never done that.
They had allegedly appointed an acting Inspector Steve Coxon to deal with
those matters. Weeks afterward it became very clear to me that all in fact
he had been doing was acting and nothing else.

I was a New Labour member of Hetton-le-Hole, Tyne-Wear, Town Council. I
spoke out at Council meetings against four family members, all Easington
Lane Ward Councillors having failed to declare an interest in the matter of land owned by one of them which was subject of Council discussion for
proposed housing. Instead of declaring an interest and not taking part in
that discussion, all were part of it and two of them spoke in favour of that housing. When I spoke out against their failure to declare that interest at
a Hetton Council meeting, the Councillor who owned that land stopped me from leaving the Council Chambers. Two of his Councillor family members held me while I was being pushed back from the door. The Councillor who owned that
land subject of Council discussion, a member of the Freemasons, then drew
his arm back in a clear action to deliver a blow to my head. That was
prevented by Councillor Mr George Wandless who took hold of that man and
pulled him away from me. I continued to be subject of threats from them. Immediately before that Council meeting, I had been asked by that mason Councillor if I owned my own home. I replied that I did. He implied that if
I mentioned their failure to declare an interest in the land mentioned
above, I might end up not owning it. That is exactly what has happened as a result of the serious crime which I have reported to you as Prime Minister since you took Office and before in 1997 when you were Leader of the Opposition. I made complaint on that matter to Northumbria Police. Inspector Williamson was appointed to investigate that matter. He never even
approached me at all. He declared a few days later that as he did not think
the rest of the Town Councillors would say what they had witnessed of the assault on me and what amounted to my false imprisonment by the Councillors,
he had decided not to take any action on that matter. That Inspector retired several months later. I have good reason to believe that he too was a member
of the Freemasons.

My wife, myself and our two daughters became subject of a death threat. A
man said that he would stab us. He went on to say that if we reported that matter to Northumbria Police he would repeat that same threat made against
us to them as well. A Northumbria Police officer was called. He went to see
the man who did indeed repeat that same death threat made against us to him
as well. No action was taken on that matter either by Northumbria Police.
This Mr Prime Minister is the way criminal elements of Freemasonry works and there are a large number of other people who can bear witness to that. It is only one of the many reasons why all those employed in the public service
must be compelled to declare any membership of Freemasonry. While I
understand your government will not do that because of possible violations
of the European Human Rights Convention under the Privacy Article, by using that same argument crime rings too could make that same claim.

In 1999 after further false allegations made by Shirley Carr I was arrested
and taken to Washington, Tyne-Wear, Police Station. My request for a doctor
to attend me was ignored. I requested a solicitor but that too was ignored.
I asked that someone be informed as to where I was being held. That request
too was ignored. After around two hours I had breathing difficulties. Only
when I made a further request that a doctor attend me did the custody
sergeant telephone one. I was allowed to speak with that doctor on the telephone and told him my symptoms and medication that I was undergoing. He informed the custody sergeant that I must be taken immediately to hospital. Following my admission there and examination, It was confirmed that I had
been seriously ill. The Police Complaints Authority confirmed afterwards
that I had been unlawfully arrested and that my continued detainment by Northumbria Police has also been unlawful. The PCA letter agreeing that was only part of the huge amount of documents now missing following the seizure
of my home on 5th February 2003.

A man criminally assaulted both my wife and I at our home. He had just previously caused criminal damage to our property. When Northumbria Police
were called to the scene, the man agreed that he had carried out those acts. Nothing was heard again from Northumbria Police on that matter as well.

Following having taken part in a radio discussion relative to Freemasonry in November of 1997 a man called at our home the following morning. In short he suggested that I would never be able to beat Freemasonry for what it is
known by many to be generally up to. He warned that someone by the name I believe was Mr John Coates had been like me and would not stop voicing his concerns about Freemasonry. He went on to say that his deep freezer
situated at South Shields, had been burnt down as a result of that. His implication was that our home could become subject of similar treatment. In January of 1998 my wife and I heard evidence that the threat of having our
home burnt down was real because a deep freezer business had in fact been
burnt down at South Shields. I reported that matter to a Northumbria police officer and that was also ignored by them. My wife had asked that we sell
our home and try to flee from the situation. That is never possible where Freemasonry in concerned and the reasons for that are numerous.

This type of behaviour by Northumbria Police is all too common to me. Its
Chief Constable is reputed to be a member of Freemasonry. He had never
issued any denial of that when I requested he do that in my letters sent to him. I am aware of a number of its senior officers also being masons. That would follow given that masons are required to give preference to their
Masonic brothers in the well known oaths that they all make. Freemasonry is also known as The Brotherhood which sets them aside all other considerations when dealing with them.

In late 2002 a possession Order for my home was made at the Teesside County Court in the favour of Carr. My bankruptcy engineered on nothing short of a
bed of crime, had allowed that situation. It had been my home most of the
time since 1947. I appealed against it on the 20th January this year (2003)
at the Teesside County Court. Durham County Court could not hear that matter because I have made a damages claim against it for its use of crime against
me detailed above. They are continuing to ignore it and had previously
alleged the matter had been referred to the London Court Service to deal
with. When I contacted them weeks after the Durham County Court allegation
that it had been referred to them, they told me that they had no record of that. I have heard nothing from any of them since that time. Judge Mainwaring-Taylor refused my application to set aside the possession Order
for my home. He had wrongly ruled that my concerns at possible Masonic influence in my cases was of no relevance ( Commissioners Case No:
CSI/136/02).

The Durham County Court quickly arranged my appeal hearing of his ruling. It was heard at Teesside County Court on Thursday 30th January this year. I had provided the judge, as yet unnamed to me, with a copy of the Commissioners
Case No: CSI/136/02 . It related to a litigant who also had concerns at possible Masonic involvement in his case which a tribunal had ignored. The Appeal ruling was that by failing to instil a feeling of confidence in that litigant, it had been an automatic violation to Article 6(1) of the European Human Rights Convention and the his appeal was upheld. When the judge at the Teesside County of the 30th January started to read that CSI/136/02 ruling
he was clearly shocked and asked if the solicitor for Carr had seen it. He indicated that he had. I took ill very shortly afterwards and the judge immediately adjourned the case. I was taken by ambulance to hospital and
spent some time in a cardiac care ward until late the following day. I had provided the judge and Carr's solicitor with the necessary protocols
required for my application for Judicial Review in my cases. I had also provided them with my skeleton argument which the Protocols required.
Nothing whatsoever was heard from the courts after that.

On Monday 2nd February this year (2003) a bailiff arrived at my home accompanied by Northumbria Police officers. I saw him trying to force entry
to my home watched by police officers. I warned them that what he was doing was illegal but the bailiff continued to try to force entry to my home. It
was then that I decided to stay my ground against what had been nothing less than the massive use of crime that had brought about that situation. I took
an ornamental sword used as an ornament and threatened to fall on it if the bailiff did not stop trying to force the door to my home. He still continued with his attempt to force entry. I took petrol from a can in my rear garden and poured some over me and held an unlighted match close to me. I warned
that if an entry was made to my home, they would just have to take what they would find of me. More police officers arrived. Two police negotiators
started to talk to me. My telephone and gas supply was turned off by the police. I had told one of the police negotiators, a female officer named to
me as Jo, that I would hand some evidence of my allegations of the crime
used to bring about that situation to her through my kitchen window. It was then that she warned me from going near that window and it was then made
clear to me that police marksmen had been stationed outside my home and were looking for an opportunity to shoot me. Jo told me she would go and have a
word with them.

Later that Monday evening police cut off my electricity. The next day my
water supply off. I was able to drink a little that I presume had been left
in the pipes. I was very sick after drinking it. When I saw the water the following morning it was heavily discoloured. On the third night Northumbria Police Special Squad officers battered down the door of my home. I stood at
the top of the stairs of it and was trying to pluck up courage to fall on
the sword that I held. Two Special Squad officers complete with riot shield, visors etc, quickly made their way up the stairs and hand cuffed me while
they were all yelling and screaming presumably to distract me. Two Special Squad officers held my shoulders but left my sword between my hands so I
could not move it. Then they proceeded to make noises that were very clearly meant to co-ordinate their pressure on my shoulders while pushing my abdomen down onto the sword. Another Special Squad Officer was near to the top of
the stairs. On seeing what his colleagues were attempting to do to me, he grabbed the handcuffs and pulled the sword away then dragged me headlong
down the stairs away from his colleagues, the two would be murderers. I suffered superficial wounds to my abdomen resulting from that murder
attempt.

I ended up at Sunderland Royal Hospital with a twenty four hour continued throughout Northumbria Police guard. The next two days no one was allowed to visit me at the hospital. Only when they were warned by someone with legal knowledge that what they were continuing to do was also illegal did they
allow me visitors. However, I was not allowed them without a police officer
in attendance. One of them confirmed to me that anything that passed in the conversation between my visitors and myself was being noted for possible
use. Essential medication that I needed and which a police doctor had
obtained especially for me was never sent to hospital. That caused me
problems when I ended up taking some wrong medication.

Before the siege of my home started on 2nd February, and the just previous Teesside County Court proceedings, I had received a letter from your Mr Matt Dowding of 10 Downing Street, London. Last year I had forwarded on a damages claim made against you for what I consider has been a serious failure in
what I consider to have been your duty as prime Minister to set in motion
the necessary mechanism to allow the UK citizen access to independent and impartial tribunals or authorities established by law for the resolution of
our criminal and civil rights. That as you will know is a requirement of Article 6(1) of the European Human Rights Convention. Mr Dowding's letter of the 16th January 2003 related to that matter. It read that my letters and
claim made against you were being passed on to the Lord Chancellors
Department to deal with. I have not had any communication from that
Department following that. My claim against you is being revised in an
upward direction following the events which have taken place in my case over this past year. Mr Fraser Kemp MP, sent had copy bundles of evidence of the judicial and other crimes that had been used against me to, The Lord Chancellors Department, The Home Office, The Parliamentary Commissioner and the Attorney General. None of these authorities accepted any responsibility
to act on the matter of judicial crime or indeed the evidence showing that. Letters that Mr Kemp MP had received from these authorities confirmed that fact. I then asked in my letter to Mr Kemp MP if he would raise these
matters for and in the general public interest in the House of Commons. He replied in his letter that he was not permitted to raise issues in the
House. That still requires an explanation.

There is absolutely no doubt that had we had such independent authorities
for me to turn to as required under Article 6(1) of the European Human
Rights Convention in the matter of the Establishment crime of which I am subject, the situation of the seizure of my home in February would not have come about. Now it has also been effectively confirmed via Mr Fraser Kemp MP that the Judiciary generally have become a law to themselves. This is itself
a very serious matter in addition to the deprival of our rights of access to independent authorities ect, for the resolution of our criminal and civil rights as required under the European Human Rights Convention. The question that remains is who was it who decided that my murder was a solution to the Establishment crime problem? That decision had surely come from high
authority?

Finally, my wife and I, since divorced after thirty years of marriage, purchased a property at Dacre Banks, North Yorkshire, in the sum of u65.000 cash in late April 1998. That purchase had been made with our money and
while we were still married and was registered at HM Land Registry in my
wife's name. I was made bankrupt in March 1999 in the sum of u15.800. I had made the Official Receiver situated at Stockton-on-Tees, aware of that purchase. According to the law, all financial transactions leading up to a bankruptcy for a period of two years are deemed to be taken into
consideration for the purposes of it. That section of law was ignored in my case. After that purchase my wife's own hand written financial accounts
which she had hidden from me, showed that there was u27.600 remaining after that house purchase. In addition, she had used forgery to obtain Land
Registry registration of our marital home into here sole name at 16A The
Lyons, Hetton-le-Hole, which had previously been registered in our joint
names. Land which had been registered at the Durham District Land Registry
in my sole name, became registered again by means of forgery, into my wife's sole name. Evidence shows that she had then sold or whatever those assets
which had been mine to the Trustee in Bankruptcy. The value of those assets
far exceeds the amount claimed in my bankruptcy even had it been obtained without the use of the mass crimes I have again reported to you.

North Yorkshire Police, in whose area my wife had purchased the property at Dacre Banks is, refused to act on my allegations regarding that. I
threatened Mr Kenworthy, the North Yorkshire Chief Constable with citizens arrest for failing to carry out his duty on that matter. Only then did he
send two detectives north to see me at my home at Hetton-le-Hole, Tyne-Wear. They saw and took copies of the evidence of my wife's hand written accounts
and were made aware of the cash house purchase by her at Dacre Banks. That purchase had been well within the period relative to bankruptcy. They detectives told me that they had sufficient evidence to act and returned to North Yorkshire. Around two weeks later I received a letter from North Yorkshire Police saying that there was insufficient evidence to act on my allegations. Even a simple check at HM Land Registry would have provided sufficient evidence of that u65.000 cash purchase by my wife, let alone the rest of it. That was again a clear indication that I was subject of a conspiracy which I attribute that to the influence of Freemasonry.

The thread of their very obvious influence remained throughout and had
started with the illegal Houghton-le-Spring Magistrate Court proceedings in 1986. The Magistrate, Mr William Moseley, who later claimed he had stood
down from judgement when I asked him to explain his presence on the bench,
was in regular attendance at Hetton-le-Hole, Masonic Hall. Pringle, the man
who had battered me and then struck me with his car that he had
deliberately driven at me, supplied the local Masonic Halls with fruit and vegetables for use in their functions.

This is not a full account of what was carried out against me by what has undoubtedly amounted to high level authority crime. It is however I think
the most substantive. I have been subject of other crime carried out by a doctor and police officers where again there was evidence of a thread of Freemasonry involved in that as well. Indications are that the problem of Masonic membership within the medical profession is also a problem. I had
been an active supporter of Mr Chris Mullin MP's Private Members, Secret Societies Declaration Bill which failed when it was talked out of time in
the House of Commons several years ago. Later he wrote to me hinting at his concern of the number of MP's who were masons. Now it is my understanding
that Mr Mullin MP pays his Constituency Office rent to the Durham Grand
Lodge of Freemasonry. Just over a year ago he was forefront in the obtaining
of a u35.000 public grant for the restoration of one of Sunderland's Masonic Halls.

The Court Service has advised that I employ a solicitor to act for me in
these matters. However, again from my past experience, I have found
solicitors generally to be involved with matters involving crime and misconduct. It is now a well known fact by me following my experience with them, and from the experience of many others that the Office For The Supervision Of Solicitors is more often involved in covering up legal profession crime and misconduct that in protecting the public from it. I suggest that is an all too common problem coming from self regulatory authorities. They have done that to me now several times. In addition, solicitors, being Officers of the Courts, cannot reasonably be claimed to be independent or impartial in matters concerning judicial crime. I am also
very aware of substantial membership of Freemasonry within the legal
profession generally and that too I know has been a factor involved in my situation.

I have previously asked that you have a Public Inquiry into my case. My
request to you regarding that has not been granted. I am aware that if such Inquiry was carried out by those authorities or tribunals as required under Article 6(1) of the ECHR, which we simply don't have, it would show that all
UK citizens and not just myself, have a very serious problem with the denial
of our rights. Mr Fraser Kemp MP's letters and evidence sent to the various authorities I have named show that the judiciary is not accountable to the public or any authority.

A list of names is being drawn up of those involved in judicial crime who,
by use of their crimes, have rendered themselves liable to a lawful citizens arrest. Such arrest is extended to all those who fail to carry out their considered public duty to act on that crime or to those who try to prevent
such lawful arrests from taking place.

I again ask that you set in motion the necessary mechanism to set up an Independent Inquiry into my case. It is clear from evidence that I have at
hand that none of what is considered as being the relevant authorities will
act on the matter of judicial crime. That same crime is clearly being
protected generally by the police in what appears to be an unwritten law. It
is therefore an illegal law being used by them.

My home and land was taken from me as a result of the crimes carried out against me, some of which I have detailed here to you, which ensured that situation. It is not my intention to beg for what is rightfully mine and
which has been stolen from me. The UK justice system is without doubt now in
a situation where it is more akin to an injustice system and accountable to
no one. I don't think that I need to write here what I believe will
eventually happen because of that. History is the best indicator.

I copy a letter written to me by Mr Benny Stone of the Court Service Unit
dated 21st October 2003. You will see their absolute reluctance to act on
these matters. But that has made their authority to act questionable in the process? This is of course the same Court Service which the Durham County
Court had alleged that they had passed on to my damages claim made against
it. To remind you of what I wrote earlier, after many months had passed I contacted the Court Service who told me that they had no record of my case having been passed to them by the Durham Country Court.

I also copy a letter to you a letter which I received from Mr Andrew Clark
of The Home Office in what he has written is in response regarding
Freemasonry and the Police Service. It is dated 28th October 2003. You will again see that the Home Office is denying any responsibility to act on the matters I have reported to you.

Mr Fraser Kemp MP, Barroness Scotland of the Lord Chancellors Department,
The Attorney General and the Parliamentary Commissioner, and indeed the Home Office were, according to Mr Fraser Kemp MP, all sent a copy dossier of evidence showing evidence of my allegations against those I have named here.
I am sure that he too was surprised at their response to him having supplied that evidence by their clear failure to act on it. I am accusing the Establishment of being deeply involved in trying to cover up its own crimes.
I am also well aware now that there are those who are capable of and
consenting to my murder to achieve my silence on these matters. I am not deterred by that.

I suffered a heart attack while looking for somewhere to live following the seizure of my home. That had also followed the attempt to murder me at the time police stormed my home. I realise now the possibility of a further
heart attack occurring and this more so because of the stress which I remain subjected to by the failure of any authority whatsoever to carry out their public duty to act on these matters. Those same authorities who are well
known by the many victims of judicial crime and misconduct of playing a sort
of game of frustration. These are just some of my reasons not to remain
silent or give in to what has become tyrannical powers now at work in the
UK. When judges are no longer answerable to Parliament for their crime, as
is the situation now, this leads our country into a very dangerous stage of
its history. My natural instinct is to fight the Establishment crime I am subjected to rather than give way to it. If I have to die in that cause then
so be it. The evil people I have named to you will ultimately be called to answer for their crimes whether I am dead or alive. I do not request a
Public Inquiry into these matters. I think it appropriate in the
circumstances which I have detailed to you that I am right to demand one.

Perhaps from information given to me you should look more into the Operation Ore list and see how many of them are members of the Freemasons. Perhaps it would also be useful to find out how many judges and police officers are included on that list and who amongst them are still employed in the Public Service where no action against them has been taken either. William Hamilton the Dunblane child mass murderer was also a known mason. There is little
doubt that his involvement in that matter is still cause for alarm to many
over the one hundred year clamp down on news of the matter of his massacre
at Dunblane.


Signed by me Maurice Kellett

Of:

Address withheld only for the purposes of this publication.

On this 11th day of November 2003.

C.C. All interested parties and publication to the general public.

maurice.kellett@ntlworld.com

http://www.mason-rule.bizhosting.com
http://www.mason-rule.0catch.com
http://www.freewebs.com/mason-rule





--- Synchronet 3.18b-Win32 NewsLink 1.113