• Re: What A.A. Does NOT Do

    From Robert McGregor@robert_mcgregor@yahoo.com.au to alt.recovery.aa,alt.society.civil-liberty on Saturday, August 02, 2003 14:08:31
    From Newsgroup: alt.society.civil-liberty


    "staamfa" <staampfa@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:UUFWa.204749$o86.84636@news1.central.cox.net...

    "Mark Warner"
    | >
    | >>
    | >> There you go with that responsibility thing again. Haven't you
    | >> learned that that's a moot point?
    | >
    | >
    | > In some contexts yes in others no. In terms of the despicability of
    | > AA and it's part in coercion into it's rewms, nill nadda none, zip,
    | > elzero the big nothin.
    |
    |
    | How 'bout in the context of you pissing dirty

    It's not moot to point out that regardless someone's urinating clean, or urinating red, white, and blue, it's dispicable of AA to accept coercees
    into it's rewms under any circumstance.



    Under any circumstances?

    Despite "coercees" themselves opining to the contrary?

    Freedom of the AA religion to open their doors to all who wish to enter
    should be abolished?

    Glad you're not ballistic merely because your own piss may have failed the test!



    Bob


    --- Synchronet 3.18b-Win32 NewsLink 1.113