From Newsgroup: alt.society.civil-liberty

Published for and in the general public interest. ----------------------------------------------

The Court Service
105 Southside
London

22nd September 2003.

My Ref: MK/CS/DCC/00103

Dear Sir.

Last year I was led to believe by the Durham County Court that the matter of serious crime carried out against me there had been referred to the London Court Service. This appears to have been yet more lies that have been used there in an attempt to mask the situation existing there. I have made a
damages claim against the Durham County Court in this matter regarding cases DH400950, DH400898 and Newcastle County Court case NE401650 but its simply being ignored by them. I would advise you that citizens arrests of those responsible for the crime used against me at the Durham and now Teesside
County Court early this year and the results of it are now under serious consideration.

The matter has been made worse by my having suffered a heart attack
following shortly after my home was illegally seized from me on the 5th of February this year by the use of force. My damages claim made against the Durham County Court is presently being adjusted in an upward direction.

I copy a letter that was sent to 10 Downing Street, London, dated the 9th August 2003. It might help you understand the situation. The Durham County Court are fully aware of my complaints of the crime used against me there.
It all started off with its Deputy District Judge Baird having heard my
appeal from the ruling of District Judge Scott-Phillips in the matter of
damage to our property caused by a vehicle collision with it. Despite my
having brought to the attention of the Durham County Court the illegality of the Deputy District Judge having heard my appeal from the Order of the
higher Court, he was allowed to rule in case NE401650 shortly after it where
he also carried out serious misconduct in that as well. I was in the circumstances told to accept the ruling in that appeal of a man who had previously carried out a serious crime against me. This is not by any means
the substantive complaint that I report to you regarding the conduct of that Court.

Yours sincerely.

Mr Maurice Kellett.
Address withheld for the purpose of this publication.
-------------------------
The letter copies below has still not received a reply from Tony Blair's
office at Downing Street. I am aware now that paying lip service to the ever rising number of victims of judicial crime is all part of Downing Street
public deception. Its a situation which endangers the UK alleged democracy
and all stemming from that. Changing my name to Bush may be the answer, but perhaps I might then branch out and blow the whistle even more?

Maurice Kellett.

http://www.mason-rule.bizhosting.com
http://www.mason-rule.0catch.com
----------------------------------------

The Prime Minister Mr Tony Blair
10 Downing Street
London.
9th August 2003.

My Ref: MK-TSG/PMTB06.

Dear Mr Prime Minister

In recent years I have made your office aware of substantial corruption used against me by members of the judiciary, police and others. In my own case
that has taken place following my contribution to the House of Commons Home Affairs Select Committee Inquiry into Freemasonry within the Police and Judiciary. I am sure that you will know Freemasonry has very substantial,
and in the circumstances unhealthy membership, within those employed in the
UK justice system. That fact alone if made known to the general public
should alert most people to consider the possible reasons why Freemasonry is
so involved in matters of justice. I, any more than other victims of
judicial crime, cannot accept the findings of that Inquiry (Nolan Inquiry)
as having been fact. In my case alone Freemasonry has proved its probable reasons for that involvement. The late Stephen Knight's book, Chapter 16 of
the Brotherhood, is a good description of the true and remaining evil situation. A situation so described by Mr Knight, so similar to that as has been used against me.

I have previously made you aware that the United Kingdom has no independent
and impartial tribunals or authorities established by law for the resolution
of our criminal and civil rights. You will have previously known that fact
in any event. All UK citizens as you know, have this right under Article
6(1) of the European Human Rights Convention. We don't have any such independent authorities. Your office is also aware that there are no authorities in the UK who will accept responsibility to act in the public interest on matters of judicial crime such as that which I have reported to you. The latter runs riot and unchecked throughout the present UK justice system. Your friend and fellow MP, Mr Fraser Kemp, established the latter
fact following his correspondence on my behalf with, The Attorney General,
The Home Office, The Parliamentary Commissioner and the Lord Chancellors Department. When I asked him to raise the latter proven facts in the House
of Commons for and in the general public interest, he replied by letter that
he is not permitted to raise issues in the House! If he instead wrote to me that he was afraid or had some other motive, for refusing to raise such an important issue in the House of Commons, that I think would have been nearer
to the truth. To accept the situation as now proven by Mr Kemp MP, would
also mean accepting that judicial and indeed police tyranny are also an acceptable part of our alleged modern democracy. I, and many others that I
am aware of will never accept that situation. To accept it would only mean accepting a rule of tyranny which is shown now to be the true situation.

On the 16th of January 2003 your Mr Matt Dowding wrote me stating that my damages claim made both against you and the Durham County Court were being referred to the Lord Chancellors Department. Very shortly afterwards, my
home came under an illegal police siege by armed officers. I then came close
to being shot despite my having been unarmed. Three days later when they battered down the door of my home, I was stabbed by two Special Squad police officers. I was only saved from certain death by the intervention of a third Special Squad police officer who it seems was not prepared to be part of a police murder. The possession of my home under those same circumstances was both illegal and an act of nothing short of terrorism. You are aware of the circumstances leading up to the unlawful possession of my home and property etc., which were equally brought about by the use of blatant judicial crime
and was backed up by further police crime and corruption.

I name again to your Office as part of the corruption that has been used against me, The Chief Constable of Northumbria Mr C. Strachan, The Chief Constable of Durham Constabulary, Mr Hedges, The Chief Constable of NorthYorkshire, Mr Kenworthy. I have specifically named these senior police officers rather than those employed under them, because they have either directly or indirectly been involved in the corruption of which I have been subject. My understanding is that a Chief Constable is responsible for the conduct of all police officers under him. That being more so when he is
fully aware of crime used by those officers under his authority but still
fails to take action on it as in my case. His general refusal to act on
crime used against a victim residing under his area of authority also shows
him up as being under a similar criminal light.

I also name as being a very significant part of the corruption, Recorder
John Fryer-Spedding sitting at the Newcastle County Court. Mr Spedding
retired when I reported him to the now former Lord Chancellor Mackay. He carried out a considerable number of acts which perverted the course of
justice and ended in my unlawful bankruptcy. The extent of the supporting evidence against Mr Spedding remains. They cannot be accepted as evidence shows, as anything but as having been deliberate acts. These matters,
including the many others reported to you, continue to be ignored by the
same authorities mentioned herein, including yourselves, who would normally
be expected to act in the public interest on such a serious use of crime. Deputy District Judge Baird, District Judge Cuthbertson, District Judge Scott-Phillips sitting at the Durham County Court. Their acts, as I have previously made known to you, are included in my damages claim made against
the Durham County Court for their part in what was none other than organized judicial crime and corruption. I attribute that crime, at least in part, to Freemasonry which it appears has a stranglehold on the UK justice system.
I further name as being a part of the same corruption, The Official
Receiver, Mr B.J. Inglis, his Office is situated at Stockton-on Tees. He was made aware that some ten months before I was declared bankrupt by the Durham County Court, my wife, Joyce Kellett, (since divorced) had purchased a
property situated at Dacre Banks, North Yorkshire and registered it in her
sole name at HM Land Registry. My bankruptcy, albeit engineered by judicial criminals assisted in the circumstances by similar type police criminals,
was in the sum of u15.800. That bankruptcy took place in March of 1999. The House purchase made by my then wife was in the sum of u65.000 cash. My then wife's own hand written accounts show that she had substantial cash
deposits, she had hidden from me, deposited in several bank and building society accounts after that house purchase well exceeding the amount
involved in my criminally engineered bankruptcy. The various authorities
again named herein, have simply turned a blind eye to that situation along
with the copies of those accounts. As in my previous correspondence with
your Office, I have made you aware that under the Law, all financial transactions leading up to a bankruptcy, for a period of two years, are
deemed for the purposes of it, to be taken into consideration. That law,
like many others, has never been applied to me. In addition, my wife had
used forgery to take sole registered possession of what had been our jointly registered marital home for over twenty years. She had also used forgery to register land that had previously been registered in my sole name into hers alone. That crime took place shortly before she left me and then commenced divorce proceedings in June of 1998. The evidence of these latter facts is nothing short of massive. Like the many other facts, backed up by similar
type evidence, they have been ignored and assisted by what is shown to be
none short of our corrupt authorities. I refuse to believe that the
corruption has just been carried out at random. Evidence shows that it has
been organized. Contributing to the Nolan Inquiry into Freemasonry within
the Police and Judiciary should on hindsight, have carried with it a
government health warning.

I made the facts stated above made known to you again in my extensive letter
of the 21st of June 2003. The person residing at the forwarding address I
had given to you in my letter, never forwarded your reply on to me. Instead
he had opened it and had then exhibited it to others. Both he, and other parties, have been involved in the theft of my personal property to the
value of around u14.000 following the illegal seizure of my home in February
of this year. There seems to be little point in reporting these things to
the proper authorities. As evidence shows, they have all previously been
part of the crime used against me.
I am past the stage of accepting what amounts to lip service only from authorities who are duty bound by the principles under any democratic
society to carry out their paid public duty to act on the crime of which I
have been subject and has been reported to you so many times. Similar type
lip service has and continues to be paid to others who have also been
subject of similar judicial crime. We know it as all being a continuing part
of the what circumstances suggest is an attempted cover up of our all too
often corrupt judicial system. Given the facts, as proved by the
correspondence received by me from Mr Fraser Kemp MP, that the UK has no authorities who will act on matters concerning judicial crime, then it will hardly be surprising to you that the situation gets worse rather than
better. The ultimate and continuing failure to act on judicial crime, could turn out to be more serious than you might at first imagine. From my
knowledge and that of many others, the rule of Law has been taken from the Parliamentary system to a judicial system no longer accountable for its own crimes. This problem alone is a very serious UK development.

I have made known in my previous correspondence with your Office that my
home, land and private possessions all stolen from me under the
circumstances already described to you, must and will be returned to me lawfully in due course. Failing that happening by consent, then I consider
it my lawful right to take it back. If necessary that could take place by
the use of similar force that was used to illegally take it from me. By the failure of your Office alone to take the necessary steps to have my
allegations investigated, you have left me with little choice but to adopt
this attitude. I accept that there is the risk again of being shot by police marksmen or of being stabbed by police officers, should I decide to
repossess my home and land. That is nothing as compared to the stress I
suffer daily in the knowledge that a generally corrupt judicial system continuing to be allowed by our relevant authorities to remain unaccountable for their crimes that have deprived me of all that I have worked for
throughout my life. I am only one of the ever increasing number of judicial victims.

I also suffered a heart attack in March of this year while looking for somewhere else to live following the illegal seizure of my home in February.
I have decided in view of the latter, and the continuing stress caused to me along with the damage stemming from it, that my claim for damages made
against you for your part as Prime Minister in your failure to provide or
set in motion the necessary facilities as required as required under Article 6(1) of the European Human Rights Convention, will now increase to the sum
of u3000.000. My claim made against the Durham County Court for its part in
the corruption I have been subjected to will now increase to u2000.000. Mr Fraser Kemp MP, was provided with considerable evidence of the crimes used against me in these matters. He also provided copies of it to the various authorities I have named here, all who have failed in what is generally considered as being part their public duty to act on it.

I am told that no one is above the law. The power of a lawful citizens
arrest made against those I have named here and others I have not named
herein, is also an option open to me. Those whose responsibility it is to
act on the evidence of the crime of which I have been subject, have also rendered themselves liable to a lawful citizens arrest. That can be carried
on to the point where true justice, rather than the injustice of criminals hiding within the justice system might come nearer. Without that due lawful process taking place, every UK citizen remains under threat of similar type judicial and other crime. It remains in the general public interest that
such action should and where evidence deems it necessary, should be carried
out to help stem the present situation.

Again, as I have previously made known to you, Northumbria Police promised a full inquiry into the matters leading up and including their own part in the illegal forced possession of my home in January. Like many of its previous promises made to me, that too is shown to have been only one of their many lies. I require to know what, if indeed any, plans that you might have to correct the situation I have made fully known to you?

The fact that even admitted crime, as was agreed in his affidavit and used
by solicitor Mr Paul Graney, then of Houghton-le-Spring, Tyne-Wear, to
effect an unlawful land registration of land under my ownership, has and remains ignored by the Senior Registrar of the Durham District Land
Registry. That factor alone, let alone the massive number of others
involved, could have prevented my alleged bankruptcy and all that which followed from it, only serves as further proof, if that were needed, that organized crime has been at work throughout my situation. That too is a
similar situation for many other victims with whom I am in contact.

Finally, should any further harm or damage be caused to me as a result of my trying to obtain justice in the matters made known to you, then all and
other steps will be taken by me or others in at least an attempt to right
the situation reported to you. Until your Office takes all appropriate
steps, then I can only consider it as being a part of the initial corruption and following damage that has been caused to me. That is of course what the
Law states when even judicial criminals might lawfully act and apply it
should they choose to do so. They now have the option to apply the law
either in a lawful or unlawful manner as they so choose. The fact that there
is no authority who will act should they choose the latter way, continues to
be a great danger to every UK law abiding citizen.

I look forward to hearing from you as a matter of some urgency.

Yours sincerely
Mr Maurice Kellett

Address withheld for the purpose of this publication.
CC. All interested parties etc.


--- Synchronet 3.18b-Win32 NewsLink 1.113