From Newsgroup: alt.society.civil-liberty

PUBLISHED FOR AND IN THE GENERAL PUBLIC INTEREST.

MURDERERS IN AUTHORITY.

The Statements that I make below are true.

Maurice Kellett.
A victim of the ruling Judicial Mafia.

The item copied below is still being ignored by Downing Street. Mr Matt
Dowding of Downing Street wrote me a letter dated the 16th of January this
year in reply to my previous letter including damages claim to Mr Tony
Blair. Mr Dowding's letter stated that the matter was being forwarded to the Lord Chancellors Department. I was at the Teesside County Court on Thursday 30th January in the matter of my appeal for what amounted to a possession
Order for my home which had been obtained by very serious judicial and
police crime. In 1996 I had contributed to the Nolan Inquiry into
Freemasonry within the Police and Judiciary. I know that was a serious
mistake on my part given what was done to me afterwards. On that day of 30th January 2003 I had also served the presiding judge, who has yet to be named
by the authorities, absolute evidence by way of a court ruling that by the courts having ignored my concerns that Freemasonry was involved in the injustice I was receiving, was a violation of Article 6.(1) of the European Human Rights Convention. My appeal was thus successful but the corrupt
courts clearly ignored that fact and the evidence I had entered into the
appeal proceedings. The violation of Article 6.(1) came because the courts
were required to have dealt with my concerns regarding Freemasonry first.
By their failing to instil in me a feeling of confidence in the courts, that itself became a violation of the Convention. Lord Justices Auld along with
Pill and Lord Woolf, Lord Bingham, The Court Service and others all
maintained that my concerns about Masonic involvement in my case had no relevance. They were of course all wrong about that matter. I find it
difficult to believe that they did not know this to be fact. The presiding judge at Teesside County Court on the 30th of January this year, seemed
shocked that I had produced the evidence proving the above fact to him. At
that time I had also served on the court and the opposing party's
solicitors, Sintons of Gosforth, Newcastle, the required protocols for my application for Judicial Review. All of this was ignored as what took place very shortly afterwards verifies. This serves only as further proof that the judiciary have become a law unto themselves and disregard the laws of this
land whenever it suits them. Many such judges have already rendered
themselves liable to citizens arrests. That will almost certainly eventually take place at sometime in the future. Tony Blair will also be fully aware of the current situation regarding judges generally being out of any form of public control. He can only be considered as being a party to it if only by default by failing in his public duty to have steps taken to remedy it.

I took ill at the Teesside County Court hearing of the 30th of January this year and was taken to a cardiac care hospital at Teesside following the
judge having adjourned the hearing. On the following Monday morning of the
3rd February it appears that the court had reconvened, without my knowledge
or even having complied with the minimum two full working days notice to me
of the reconvened court hearing, as is required by law. At 2pm on the 3rd of February a bailiff attempted to force entry into my home watched over by a police officer. At present the law does not allow a bailiff to force entry
to any property. As a mason once told me, once you have confronted
Freemasonry then the law no longer applies to you. I dismissed that when it
was first said to me. Now I accept it as fact and the evidence alone on http://www.mason-rule.bizhosting.com proves that without the other mass of evidence which also shows it.

It is now verified that police officers had planned to shoot me on the first night of the siege of my home though I was no danger to anyone but myself. I was prepared to suffer death rather than give up the lwful possession of my home to such baltant use of crime carried out against me by those named on http://www.mason-rule.bizhosting.com and others. Shooting me was thwarted when it appears now that there were too many bystanders witnessing
proceedings. The Northern Echo newspaper report mentioned earlier said that
the police also had tear gas for use against me. Three nights later under
the cover of darkness and when they had worn me down because of lack of
heat, medication, food and even the water supply and telephone to my home
was cut, Special Squad police officers from Northumbria Police battered down the door of my home. Two of them held me by my shoulders and commenced to
push my abdomen down onto a sword. My murder was stopped when another of the Special Squad Police officers pulled me away from the two officers who were stabbing me. While I cannot be sure of what his intent was, I have to accept that most probably he did not want to be a party to my murder and that was
the probable reason for him pulling me away from his murdering colleagues.
It is absolutely clear that there had been an intent to kill me. The
commander of that Special Squad police force will I am sure be responsible
for murder at sometime unless he is dismissed or sent for psychiatric examination and possible treatment. I became aware of his character at the Washington Tyne-Wear Police Station when his version of their assault on me
and my home was different to the what actually happened and what he said to
me when I disputed it. I cannot believe that the decision to kill me came
only from the police officers on the ground as it were. That permission
would most certainly have come from either The Chief Constable of
Northumbria I understand another member of the Freemasons, or from Downing Street who were aware of my case and its relationship to Tony Blair by
reason that the UK citizen has no access to any independent and impartial tribunals or authorities as required under Article 6.(1) of the European
Human Rights Convention. Of course Mr Blair is fully aware of this serious violation of all of our rights as UK and European Citizens under the Convention, along with his close pal Mr Fraser Kemp MP who would not raise
the matter at the House of Commons by stating that he was not permitted to raise issues in the House when I wrote asking him to do that. Mr Kemp was supplied with a large dossier of evidence of part of the serious judicial
crime used against me. He provided copies of that dossier to, The Lord Chancellors Department, The Home Office, The Parliamentary Commissioner and
the Attorney General all who denied any responsibility to act on the matter
of judicial crime. This fact shows just how serious the matter has become
for us all.

Given the very serious clearly organised crime that was used to deprive me
of my home and land, it is not my intent to allow that situation to remain.
I will risk being shot again or even being stabbed by the police when I eventually take back my home. The proof of their criminal acts used against
me is all around. This raises other serious matters which I will not enter
into here.

While a lot of the evidence of the crime used against me was stolen
following the battering down of the door of my home and that too was clearly intended by the criminals in power, I still have access to a considerable amount of it. Some of that evidence is published at: http://www.mason-rule.bizhosting.com and other websites.

This matter should be of serious concern to all. I am aware that the Land Registry, the Courts, Banks and others are generally involved in this sort
of crime from my contacts with the many other victims of their victims over recent years.

The criminals that I have named on my website at http://www.mason-rule.bizhosting.com are still at large as well. If further evidence were needed, we, my then wife and I, purchased a house at Dacre
Banks North Yorkshire in the sum of u65.000 cash. The main decision to do
that was taken by my wife who then registered the property in her sole name
at HM Land Registry. Ten months later I was declared bankrupt by Durham
County Court in the sume of u15.000 following serious crime carried out
against me by several of their judges, most probably Freemasons or at least doing their bidding. My wife had hidden our finances from me and when I eventually found them, they showed that she had u27.600 left in her hidden accounts after the house purchase. I believe that there was more than that left, but did not have the proof of it. The Chief Constable of North
Yorkshire, Mr Kenworthy, refused carry out his duty on that matter. Only
when I threatened him with a lawful citizens arrest did he send two
detectives north from Yorkshire to Tyne-Wear to see me. They both agreed
when they saw the evidence, which was written financial accounts in my
wife's own handwriting, that it was sufficient for them to act on. Later I received a letter from North Yorkshire Police stating that there was insufficient evidence for them to act on. A simple check at HM Land Registry was all that would have been required let alone having been supplied with a copy of my wife's hidden accounts in her own handwriting showing that before the house purchase she had around u95.000 in accounts that she had hidden
from me. Our marital home at 16A The Lyons, Hetton-le-Hole, Tyne-Wear, which had previously been registered at HM Land Registry in our joint names had become registered into my wife's sole name by means of her forgery. Land
that had been registered in my sole name found its way into registration in
her sole name again by the use of forgery. All of this has now found its way into the hands of Miss Shirley Carr who was allowed the use of serious
perjury and deception against me by both the courts and police ( http://www.mason-rule.bizhosting.com) . That served as evidence that I was
up against serious organised crime. That crime again has almost certainly
been organised and assisted by Freemasonry who have their members in every authority in this land but most certainly extensively within the Police and Judiciary.

I was in contact with Lord Nolan who chaired the Government Inquiry into Freemasonry Within the Police and Judiciary. In January of 1998 Lord Nolan wrote to tell me that he was returning to being a member of the Law Lords
and thereafter had to remain impartial to the information that I was supply
him with. After speaking with others who also took part in that Inquiry, I, like them, am satisfied that it was all part of coverup of the real problem
the UK currently has with Freemasonry within the Police and Judiciary. I am also aware of the problem with Freemasonry within the medical profession. Freemasonry within the justice system generally is rife and presents a huge danger to us all.

My real problems with Freemasonry all started in 1986 after I had been
battered and then struck by a car when I learned of and became subject of
crime at the then British Coal Estates at Spennymoor, Co. Durham. The Houghton-le-Spring Magistrates Court proceedings it were utterly and
blatantly illegal. Masons were in it up to their very necks. The Lord Chancellors Department was also part of the cover up of those illegal proceedings. Northumbria Police have consistently used deception as a way of carrying out their public duty to act on that Court crime along with other serious judicial crime used against me at the Newcastle County Court some of which is detailed at http://www.mason-rule.bizhosting.com and http://www.mason-rule.0catch.com and other sites.

The Official Receiver situated at Stocton-on-Tees was aware that my wife had purchased the property at dacre Banks in Yorkshire for u65.000 cash some
ten months before I was made bankrupt for u15.800. He then ignored the fact that in the circumstances, even if my bankruptcy had been lawful and had not been engineered by the use of serious judicial and other crime stemming from
my opposition to Freemasonry, I could not have been a bankrupt. That showed again that there is a circle of serious crime being carried out against the
UK citizen by the various authorities who are generally riddled with
membership of Freemasonry.

I also wish to add, from my knowledge recently conveyed to me by another judicial victim, that the Northern Echo published in April what they claim
was an interview with my brother who was until quite recently the New Labour Leader of Durham City Council. He lives at Pittington, Co. Durham. In it he claims to have offered to pay my bankruptcy costs but that I had declined
his offer on moral grounds. At no time did my brother, a known member of the Freemasons though he denies it to me and family members, offer to make any payment whatsoever to my bankruptcy costs. Indeed he said that he would not even try to help me unless I backed away from Freemasonry who were
instrument to it. There are other facts coming to light about what my
brother has been up to. While I was staying at his home after my own was illegally taken from me following nothing short of Judicial and Police
Masonic crime, I and others witnessed his theft from my personal belongings, including many of the files that I held on my cases showing a mass of
evidence of the crime that was used against me. Around u14.000 worth of my personal possessions have also been taken. My brother the former leader of
the Durham City Council, will eventually be called to account for this
matter and to others that I am aware he has been up to as well.

My civil opponent in the matter leading up to my criminally engineered bankruptcy, and her assistant a solicitor from Durham, details and evidence at: http://www.mason-rule.bizhosting.com still walk free following their
own use of serious crimes against me. These crimes were ignored by the
various authorities clearly for the purposes of hitting at me for being a whiste blower against our generally corrupt establishment. Those authorities include The Office For The Supervision of Solicitors which is also known to
be influenced by Freemasonry. What I have written here is by no means the
full extent of what has been done to me. What I know has been documented
with evidence showing it to others.

---------------------------------------------
The Prime Ministers Office have also still failed to act on the contents of
my letter copied below or my letter previous to it. Mr Blair in the circumstance, may also be guilty of the crime of misconduct in public office (Regina-v-Dytham and others cases) by default. Either we accept that no one
is above the law or we accept that some are. It appears that judges
generally are being treated as being above the law. That is by virtue of
there being no mechanism for bringing them to trial once they act outside of
it as many of them do. My own case, and I know of many more, shows that the
UK has an even more serious problem with the justice system than most might
at first think.

Maurice Kellett.
---------------------------------------------
Address withheld for the purposes of this publication.

The Prime Minister
Mr Tony Blair

10 Downing Street

London.

9th August 2003.

My Ref: MK-TSG/PMTB06.

Dear Mr Prime Minister

In recent years I have made your office aware of substantial corruption used against me by members of the judiciary, police and others. In my own case
that has taken place following my contribution to the House of Commons Home Affairs Select Committee Inquiry into Freemasonry within the Police and Judiciary. I am sure that you will know Freemasonry has very substantial,
and in the circumstances unhealthy membership, within those employed in the
UK justice system. That fact alone if made known to the general public
should alert most people to consider the possible reasons why Freemasonry is
so involved in matters of justice. I, any more than other victims of
judicial crime, cannot accept the findings of that Inquiry (Nolan Inquiry)
as having been fact. In my case alone Freemasonry has proved its probable reasons for that involvement. The late Stephen Knight's book, Chapter 16 of
the Brotherhood, is a good description of the true and remaining evil situation. A situation so described by Mr Knight, so similar to that as has been used against me.

I have previously made you aware that the United Kingdom has no independent
and impartial tribunals or authorities established by law for the resolution
of our criminal and civil rights. You will have previously known that fact
in any event. All UK citizens as you know, have this right under Article
6(1) of the European Human Rights Convention. We don't have any such independent authorities. Your office is also aware that there are no authorities in the UK who will accept responsibility to act in the public interest on matters of judicial crime such as that which I have reported to you. The latter runs riot and unchecked throughout the present UK justice system. Your friend and fellow MP, Mr Fraser Kemp, established the latter
fact following his correspondence on my behalf with, The Attorney General,
The Home Office, The Parliamentary Commissioner and the Lord Chancellors Department. When I asked him to raise the latter proven facts in the House
of Commons for and in the general public interest, he replied by letter that
he is not permitted to raise issues in the House! If he instead wrote to me that he was afraid or had some other motive, for refusing to raise such an important issue in the House of Commons, that I think would have been nearer
to the truth. To accept the situation as now proven by Mr Kemp MP, would
also mean accepting that judicial and indeed police tyranny are also an acceptable part of our alleged modern democracy. I, and many others that I
am aware of will never accept that situation. To accept it would only mean accepting a rule of tyranny which is shown now to be the true situation.

On the 16th of January 2003 your Mr Matt Dowding wrote me stating that my damages claim made both against you and the Durham County Court were being referred to the Lord Chancellors Department. Very shortly afterwards, my
home came under an illegal police siege by armed officers. I then came close
to being shot despite my having been unarmed. Three days later when they battered down the door of my home, I was stabbed by two Special Squad police officers. I was only saved from certain death by the intervention of a third Special Squad police officer who it seems was not prepared to be part of a police murder. The possession of my home under those same circumstances was both illegal and an act of nothing short of terrorism. You are aware of the circumstances leading up to the unlawful possession of my home and property etc., which were equally brought about by the use of blatant judicial crime
and was backed up by further police crime and corruption.

I name again to your Office as part of the corruption that has been used against me, The Chief Constable of Northumbria Mr C. Strachan, The Chief Constable of Durham Constabulary, Mr Hedges, The Chief Constable of NorthYorkshire, Mr Kenworthy. I have specifically named these senior police officers rather than those employed under them, because they have either directly or indirectly been involved in the corruption of which I have been subject. My understanding is that a Chief Constable is responsible for the conduct of all police officers under him. That being more so when he is
fully aware of crime used by those officers under his authority but still
fails to take action on it as in my case. His general refusal to act on
crime used against a victim residing under his area of authority also shows
him up as being under a similar criminal light.

I also name as being a very significant part of the corruption, Recorder
John Fryer-Spedding sitting at the Newcastle County Court. Mr Spedding
retired when I reported him to the now former Lord Chancellor Mackay. He carried out a considerable number of acts which perverted the course of
justice and ended in my unlawful bankruptcy. The extent of the supporting evidence against Mr Spedding remains. They cannot be accepted as evidence shows, as anything but as having been deliberate acts. These matters,
including the many others reported to you, continue to be ignored by the
same authorities mentioned herein, including yourselves, who would normally
be expected to act in the public interest on such a serious use of crime. Deputy District Judge Baird, District Judge Cuthbertson, District Judge Scott-Phillips sitting at the Durham County Court. Their acts, as I have previously made known to you, are included in my damages claim made against
the Durham County Court for their part in what was none other than organised judicial crime and corruption. I attribute that crime, at least in part, to Freemasonry which it appears has a stranglehold on the UK justice system.

I further name as being a part of the same corruption, The Official
Receiver, Mr B.J. Inglis, his Office is situated at Stockton-on Tees. He was made aware that some ten months before I was declared bankrupt by the Durham County Court, my wife, Joyce Kellett, (since divorced) had purchased a
property situated at Dacre Banks, North Yorkshire and registered it in her
sole name at HM Land Registry. My bankruptcy, albeit engineered by judicial criminals assisted in the circumstances by similar type police criminals,
was in the sum of u15.800. That bankruptcy took place in March of 1999. The House purchase made by my then wife was in the sum of u65.000 cash. My then wife's own hand written accounts show that she had substantial cash
deposits, she had hidden from me, deposited in several bank and building society accounts after that house purchase well exceeding the amount
involved in my criminally engineered bankruptcy. The various authorities
again named herein, have simply turned a blind eye to that situation along
with the copies of those accounts. As in my previous correspondence with
your Office, I have made you aware that under the Law, all financial transactions leading up to a bankruptcy, for a period of two years, are
deemed for the purposes of it, to be taken into consideration. That law,
like many others, has never been applied to me. In addition, my wife had
used forgery to take sole registered possession of what had been our jointly registered marital home for over twenty years. She had also used forgery to register land that had previously been registered in my sole name into hers alone. That crime took place shortly before she left me and then commenced divorce proceedings in June of 1998. The evidence of these latter facts is nothing short of massive. Like the many other facts, backed up by similar
type evidence, they have been ignored and assisted by what is shown to be
none short of our corrupt authorities. I refuse to believe that the
corruption has just been carried out at random. Evidence shows that it has
been organised. Contributing to the Nolan Inquiry into Freemasonry within
the Police and Judiciary should on hindsight, have carried with it a
government health warning.

I made the facts stated above made known to you again in my extensive letter
of the 21st of June 2003. The person residing at the forwarding address I
had given to you in my letter, never forwarded your reply on to me. Instead
he had opened it and had then exhibited it to others. Both he, and other parties, have been involved in the theft of my personal property to the
value of around u14.000 following the illegal seizure of my home in February
of this year. There seems to be little point in reporting these things to
the proper authorities. As evidence shows, they have all previously been
part of the crime used against me.

I am past the stage of accepting what amounts to lip service only from authorities who are duty bound by the principles under any democratic
society to carry out their paid public duty to act on the crime of which I
have been subject and has been reported to you so many times. Similar type
lip service has and continues to be paid to others who have also been
subject of similar judicial crime. We know it as all being a continuing part
of the what circumstances suggest is an attempted cover up of our all too
often corrupt judicial system. Given the facts, as proved by the
correspondence received by me from Mr Fraser Kemp MP, that the UK has no authorities who will act on matters concerning judicial crime, then it will hardly be surprising to you that the situation gets worse rather than
better. The ultimate and continuing failure to act on judicial crime, could turn out to be more serious than you might at first imagine. From my
knowledge and that of many others, the rule of Law has been taken from the Parliamentary system to a judicial system no longer accountable for its own crimes. This problem alone is a very serious UK development.

I have made known in my previous correspondence with your Office that my
home, land and private possessions all stolen from me under the
circumstances already described to you, must and will be returned to me lawfully in due course. Failing that happening by consent, then I consider
it my lawful right to take it back. If necessary that could take place by
the use of similar force that was used to illegally take it from me. By the failure of your Office alone to take the necessary steps to have my
allegations investigated, you have left me with little choice but to adopt
this attitude. I accept that there is the risk again of being shot by police marksmen or of being stabbed by police officers, should I decide to
repossess my home and land. That is nothing as compared to the stress I
suffer daily in the knowledge that a generally corrupt judicial system continuing to be allowed by our relevant authorities to remain unaccountable for their crimes that have deprived me of all that I have worked for
throughout my life. I am only one of the ever increasing number of judicial victims.

I also suffered a heart attack in March of this year while looking for somewhere else to live following the illegal seizure of my home in February.


I have decided in view of the latter, and the continuing stress caused to me along with the damage stemming from it, that my claim for damages made
against you for your part as Prime Minister in your failure to provide or
set in motion the necessary facilities as required as required under Article 6(1) of the European Human Rights Convention, will now increase to the sum
of u3000.000. My claim made against the Durham County Court for its part in
the corruption I have been subjected to will now increase to u2000.000. Mr Fraser Kemp MP, was provided with considerable evidence of the crimes used against me in these matters. He also provided copies of it to the various authorities I have named here, all who have failed in what is generally considered as being part their public duty to act on it.

I am told that no one is above the law. The power of a lawful citizens
arrest made against those I have named here and others I have not named
herein, is also an option open to me. Those whose responsibility it is to
act on the evidence of the crime of which I have been subject, have also rendered themselves liable to a lawful citizens arrest. That can be carried
on to the point where true justice, rather than the injustice of criminals hiding within the justice system might come nearer. Without that due lawful process taking place, every UK citizen remains under threat of similar type judicial and other crime. It remains in the general public interest that
such action should and where evidence deems it necessary, should be carried
out to help stem the present situation.

Again, as I have previously made known to you, Northumbria Police promised a full inquiry into the matters leading up and including their own part in the illegal forced possession of my home in January. Like many of its previous promises made to me, that too is shown to have been only one of their many lies. I require to know what, if indeed any, plans that you might have to correct the situation I have made fully known to you?

The fact that even admitted crime, as was agreed in his affidavit and used
by solicitor Mr Paul Graney, then of Houghton-le-Spring, Tyne-Wear, to
effect an unlawful land registration of land under my ownership, has and remains ignored by the Senior Registrar of the Durham District Land
Registry. That factor alone, let alone the massive number of others
involved, could have prevented my alleged bankruptcy and all that which followed from it, only serves as further proof, if that were needed, that organised crime has been at work throughout my situation. That too is a
similar situation for many other victims with whom I am in contact.

Finally, should any further harm or damage be caused to me as a result of my trying to obtain justice in the matters made known to you, then all and
other steps will be taken by me or others in at least an attempt to right
the situation reported to you. Until your Office takes all appropriate
steps, then I can only consider it as being a part of the initial corruption and following damage that has been caused to me. That is of course what the
Law states when even judicial criminals might lawfully act and apply it
should they choose to do so. They now have the option to apply the law
either in a lawful or unlawful manner as they so choose. The fact that there
is no authority who will act should they choose the latter way, continues to
be a great danger to every UK law abiding citizen.

I look forward to hearing from you as a matter of some urgency.

Yours sincerely

Mr Maurice Kellett

Address withheld for the purposes of this publication.

CC. All interested parties etc.


--- Synchronet 3.18b-Win32 NewsLink 1.113