• comp.lang.eiffel Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

    From Franck Arnaud@franck@nenie.org to comp.lang.eiffel,comp.answers,news.answers on Sunday, November 09, 2003 09:08:28
    From Newsgroup: comp.answers

    Archive-name: eiffel-faq
    Posting-Frequency: approximately monthly
    Last-modified: 30 Sep 2003

    EIFFEL: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
    ----------------------------------

    This question-and-answer list is posted monthly to the Usenet
    newsgroups comp.lang.eiffel, comp.answers and news.answers.

    Please send corrections and comments to franck@nenie.org

    This information is abstracted and condensed from the posts of many contributors to comp.lang.eiffel, supplemented by information from
    vendors. No guarantees are made regarding its accuracy.

    This compilation is by Franck Arnaud. Distribution is unrestricted.
    It builds on the work of the previous maintainers: Rock Howard,
    Roger Browne, Conrad Taylor in chronological order.

    You can get the latest from the web:

    http://www.faqs.org/faqs/eiffel-faq/
    ftp://rtfm.mit.edu/pub/usenet/news.answers/eiffel-faq

    or by sending an email message to mail-server@rtfm.mit.edu with this
    message body:

    send /pub/usenet/news.answers/eiffel-faq

    --------------------

    WHAT'S NEW?

    Changes since the last posting:

    QGRP RIPLEG new web address

    --------------------

    CONTENTS

    Frequently Asked Questions:

    QEIF What is Eiffel?
    QORI Where did Eiffel come from?
    QCOM What Eiffel compilers are available?
    QLIB What Eiffel libraries are available?
    QFRE Is Eiffel available as free software?
    QARC Is there an archive of the comp.lang.eiffel newsgroup?
    QBOK What books are available for learning about Eiffel?
    QWEB Where can I find Eiffel on the World-Wide-Web?
    QEDI Where can I get an Eiffel editor or emacs-mode?
    QBON What is BON?
    QSTD Are there standards for the Eiffel language?
    QPOR How do I write portable applications?
    QTGV How fast do Eiffel applications run?
    QGRP Are there any Eiffel user groups?
    QADR Where can I get Eiffel products and services?
    QCNF Are there any conferences for Eiffel users?
    QECC Why do many Eiffel implementations compile to C?
    QJVM Where can I get an Eiffel to Java compiler?
    QNET Where can I get an Eiffel to .NET compiler?

    Language Issues:

    LFEA What features does Eiffel have?
    LCHN What changes have been made to the Eiffel language definition?
    LLIB What libraries come with Eiffel?
    LDBC What's the big deal about preconditions and postconditions?
    LCON Please explain and discuss covariance vs. contravariance.
    LCAT Is it true that there are "holes" in the Eiffel type system?
    LTSK Is there support for concurrency in Eiffel?
    LOVL Why doesn't Eiffel allow function overloading?
    LAGE What are Eiffel agents?
    LATR Why are there no class attributes in Eiffel?
    LPAR How can I call the parent-class version of a redefined
    routine?
    LEVC Where can I find a comparison between Eiffel and C++?
    LDES Are there any destructors in Eiffel?
    LDIS How do I implement multiple inheritance efficiently?
    LISA How does the `Iterating several actions' example in ETL work?
    LORB Is COM/CORBA supported?

    --------------------

    QEIF: What is Eiffel?

    Eiffel is an advanced object-oriented programming language and
    method that emphasizes the design and construction of high-quality
    and reusable software.

    Eiffel is not a superset or extension of any other language. Eiffel
    strongly encourages OO programming and does not allow dangerous
    practices from previous generation languages although it does
    interface to other languages such as C and C++. Eiffel supports the
    concept of "Design by Contract" to improve software correctness.

    Beyond the language aspect Eiffel may be viewed as a method of
    software construction. Eiffel is an excellent vehicle for software
    education, including for a first programming course.

    --------------------

    QORI: Where did Eiffel come from?

    Eiffel was created by Bertrand Meyer and developed by his company,
    Eiffel Software Inc. of Goleta, CA.

    Dr. Meyer borrowed on his extensive experience with OOP, particularly
    with Simula. He also added in important concepts from his academic
    work on software verification and computer language definition.

    Eiffel's design addresses many practical concerns that software
    engineers face when creating complex software. Eiffel has evolved
    continually since its conception on September 14, 1985 and its first introduction in 1986.

    Eiffel is named after Gustave Eiffel, the engineer who designed the
    Eiffel Tower.

    --------------------

    QCOM: What Eiffel compilers are available?

    The following Eiffel compilers are currently available and supported
    by their vendors or authors. The list is ordered by date of first
    publication.

    In the case of commercial products, the price is not mentioned because
    there can be varying conditions depending on platforms, conditions of
    use (personal vs. professional), etc. Please check with the vendors'
    web-sites for up to date pricing information.

    In the list below, the 'target' entry indicates what code is produced
    by the compiler. Most -- but not all -- compilers produce C code so a
    supported C compiler may be needed. Some compilers or distributions
    include a freeware C compiler.

    In the 'platform' entry, an indication of supported platforms is given.
    "Win32" means 32 bit version of Windows on Intel x86. "Unix" means
    various Unices, check with vendor for the actual list of platforms.
    All vendors supporting Unix do support Linux on Intel x86.

    Vendor: Eiffel Software, Inc., USA
    Product: EiffelStudio / EiffelENViSioN
    Licensing conditions: Commercial; free for non-commercial use
    Target: C/.NET
    Platforms: Win32, Unix, .NET, VMS
    Web: http://www.eiffel.com/

    Brief description:
    This product forrmely known as ISE Eiffel is available either as
    a stand alone development environment (EiffelStudio) or integrated
    into Visual Studio for .NET (Eiffel ENViSioN). It includes:
    - a complete graphical development environment with
    unique facilities for power browsing, documentation, symbolic
    debugging, fast compilations and more. It also supports a diagram
    tool based on the BON method.
    - EiffelBase, which is also available under an open source license,
    is a complete and professional set of classes covering containers,
    collections, I/O, iterators, object persistence, searching, etc.
    - EiffelVision2, a powerful multiplatform graphical library.
    - Under Windows, the Windows Eiffel Library (WEL), combining the
    power of Eiffel with access to the Windows API and the EiffelCOM
    library to create/reuse existing COM components.
    - Many other libraries: EiffelNet, EiffelLex, EiffelParse, EiffelWeb,
    EiffelStore, Eiffel2Java, EiffelThread, EiffelTime


    Vendor: Dominique Colnet et al
    Product: SmartEiffel the GNU Eiffel compiler
    Licensing conditions: Freeware (GPL)
    Target: ANSI C / Java Virtual Machine
    Platforms: Any ANSI C machine
    Web: http://smarteiffel.loria.fr/

    Brief description:
    SmartEiffel is intended to be a complete, though small and very fast,
    free Eiffel compiler, available for a wide range of platforms.
    It includes an Eiffel to C compiler, an Eiffel to Java bytecode
    compiler, a documentation tool, a pretty printer, etc.
    The compiler uses an innovative strategy involving whole system
    analysis which allows compilation to be often faster than the
    incremental compilation of traditional compilers.
    It was originally designed (under the name SmallEiffel) at the
    LORIA lab, Nancy, France, in 1994-95, and has since been used
    worldwide by many individuals and universities.


    Vendor: Object Tools GmbH, Germany
    Product: Visual Eiffel
    Licensing conditions: Commercial on Win32 (free eval); freeware on Linux
    Target: Native Intel x86
    Platforms: Win32, Linux (command line tools)
    Web: http://www.object-tools.com/ or http://www.eiffel.de/

    Brief description:
    Using Visual Eiffel and DM will help you to develop complex Windows
    applications in a very short time. Visual Eiffel gives you
    - an integrated workbench with the Windows look and feel
    - a professional Eiffel compiler producing very efficient native
    code for Intel processors
    - DM - the most rapid RAD tool you have ever seen gives you
    everything to build applications for Windows fast.
    - many useful libraries for the production of commercial Windows
    applications - for ActiveX component integration, for ODBC access,
    for the creation of nice graphical packages and much more.


    Vendor: Object Tools GmbH, Germany
    Product: Eiffel for OS X
    Licensing conditions: Commercial (free eval)
    Target: ANSI C
    Platforms: Mac OS (PowerPC)
    Web: http://www.maceiffel.com/

    Brief description:
    Based on Object Tools' original Eiffel/S compiler, Eiffel
    for the Macintosh runs under Mac OS X.
    The compiler is available as an add-on for either Apple
    ProjectBuilder and or MetrowWerks CodeWarrior.
    It includes the usual kernel libraries and also Eiffel
    libraries wrapping the Macintosh API, both Cocoa and Carbon.
    The earlier version for MacOS 8 and 9 is available at
    http://www.object-tools.com/products/eiffel-s/


    Other Eiffel compilers are worth mentioning although they may be
    either not supported any more, or an older version, or at an early
    stage of development so that their implementation of the language
    may be far from complete.


    - SIG Eiffel/S, version 1.3: this was the first Eiffel 3 compiler,
    and the first compiler available on the PC platform. Version 1.3,
    which is a few years old, is still available as shareware from Object
    Tools (formerly SIG) at http://www.object-tools.com/.
    It is a command line compiler producing C code, and it is available
    for DOS32, Windows 95 and NT and many Unix platforms.

    - TowerEiffel was a commercial compiler with an emphasis on the
    performance
    of generated code. It stopped being actively maintained and sold after
    Tower Technology moved on to write a static Java compiler using the
    same kinds of system-wide optimisations found in most Eiffel compilers.

    - iss-base was a compiler and environment from Halstenbach ACT GmbH.
    It started out as a licensed derivative of ISE Eiffel, but the
    development forked afterwards and the core compiler was developed
    independently and for a while became one of the best performing
    Eiffel compilers. The development environment remained almost
    unchanged, but independently developed add on libraries and a UI
    builder were added. The product is currently not being publicised.

    - There has been various other compiler projects which are not widely
    used: EON Eiffel, an Eiffel to C++ compiler, written
    in C++, not actively maintained; J-Eiffel, a compiler generating
    JVM bytecode form Pirmin Kalberer; and Fridtjof Siebert's FEC, a
    native code compiler for Sun SPARC machines.


    --------------------

    QLIB: What Eiffel libraries are available?

    Eiffel vendors usually supply a large set of libraries with their
    compilers, and provide others as additions.

    Many libraries, usually open source, are available from third
    parties and are too numerous to list here. See QWEB for reference
    websites which have listings of available libraries. A good
    starting point is at:

    http://www.cetus-links.org/oo_eiffel_libraries.html

    --------------------

    QFRE: Is Eiffel available as free software?

    SmartEiffel is an open source compiler, provided as a highly
    portable C package that can compile on most ANSI C platforms.
    The full Eiffel source code of the compiler itself (in
    Eiffel) is included. See QCOM.

    A ready-to-run package for Windows, including a freeware C
    compiler, is available at http://elj.sourceforge.net/

    Many commercial vendors offer free evaluation versions, with
    some limitations. Commercial vendors often also have cheap
    entry-level versions for popular platforms like Win32 and
    Linux on x86 PCs.

    --------------------

    QARC: Is there an archive of the comp.lang.eiffel newsgroup?

    Yes, it is on Google groups:
    http://groups.google.com/groups?group=comp.lang.eiffel


    --------------------

    QBOK: What books are available for learning about Eiffel?


    ESSENTIAL READING

    Title: Object-Oriented Software Construction, second edition
    Author: Bertrand Meyer
    ISBN: ISBN 0-13-629155-4 - Prentice Hall 1997
    Short: This book is the comprehensive reference on all aspects of
    object technology, from design principles to O-O techniques,
    Design by Contract, O-O analysis, concurrency, persistence,
    abstract data types and many more. While Eiffel is only
    presented as the 'notation' used to illustrate the concept,
    it is essential reading for any Eiffelist -- it includes a
    rather complete description of the 'notation'. It comes with
    a CD-ROM containing the complete hyperlinked text,
    supplementary material, and a version of ISE Eiffel.

    Title: Eiffel: The Language
    Author: Bertrand Meyer
    ISBN: ISBN 0-13-247925-7 -- Prentice Hall 1992
    Short: This book combines an introduction to Eiffel, the language
    reference, and a good deal of philosophy into its 600 pages.
    This is a rigorous and comprehensive book which some readers
    may find heavy going despite Dr. Meyer's clarity of expression.
    It is the definitive language reference, and essential reading
    for all serious Eiffel users. Get the second or later printing
    (same ISBN), which includes many corrections and changes (there
    is not a second edition, and none is currently underway). This
    book is also available in French (ISBN 2-7296-0525-8).

    OTHER BOOKS

    Title: Design Patterns and Contracts
    Author: Jean-Marc Jezequel, Michel Train, Christine Mingins
    ISBN: 0-20-130959-9 -- Addison-Wesley 1999
    Short: This book builds on the work on software design patterns
    as published in the 'Gang of Four' book by Gamma et al. Design
    by Contract is applied to design patterns.

    Title: Objects Unencapsulated: Java, Eiffel, and C++?
    Author: Ian Joyner -- ISBN 0-13-014269-7 -- PH 1999
    Short: An examination of the core of object-oriented technology
    through a comparison between Java, Eiffel and C++.

    Title: Object Oriented Programming in Eiffel, 2nd edition
    Author: Pete Thomas and Ray Weedon -- ISBN: 0-201-33131-4 -- AW 1997
    Short: This book is a very comprehensive Eiffel tutorial and textbook,
    with a solid "Abstract Data Type" approach.

    Title: Algorithms and Data Structures
    Author: Jeffrey Kingston -- ISBN: 0-201-40374-9 -- AW 1997
    Short: A treatment of the central algorithms and data structures of
    computer science, including complete Eiffel implementations.

    Title: An Object-Oriented Introduction to Computer Science Using Eiffel Author: Richard Wiener -- ISBN: 0-13-838725 -- PH 1997
    Short: None

    Title: Object Technology for Scientific Computing Object-Oriented
    Numerical Software in Eiffel and C
    Author: Paul Dubois -- ISBN: 0-13-267808-X -- PH 1996
    Short: Accompanying CD with the Free Eiffel for UNIX & Linux
    environments.

    Title: Object-Oriented Software Engineering with Eiffel
    Author: Jean-Marc Jezequel -- ISBN: 0-201-63381-7 -- AW 1996
    Short: A comprehensive guide to Eiffel. In addition to describing
    Eiffel, the book contains descriptions and comparisons of
    compilers and libraries available on the market.

    Title: Object Structures: Building OO Software Components with Eiffel
    Author: Jacob Gore -- ISBN: 0-201-63480-5 -- AW 1996
    Short: This is the first "data structures" book for Eiffel, bringing
    to the study of that language the first comprehensive
    treatment of one of the most important topics in any
    programming language.

    Title: Eiffel Object-Oriented Programming
    Author: John Tyrrell -- ISBN: 0-333-64554-5 -- 1995
    Short: This is an inexpensive and very approachable book.

    Title: Software Development Using Eiffel: There can be life other than C++ Author: Richard Wiener -- ISBN: 0-13-100686-X -- PH 1995
    Short: This is a useful book with a lot of code examples for those
    with a grounding in another OO language.

    Title: Object Success
    Author: Bertrand Meyer -- ISBN: 0-13-192833-3 -- PH 1995
    Short: This book is a manager's guide to object orientation, its
    impact on the corporation and its use for re-engineering the
    software process.

    Title: Object Oriented Programming in Eiffel
    Author: R. Rist and R. Terwilliger -- ISBN: 0-13-205931-2 -- PH 1995
    Short: This is a textbook with an emphasis on design.

    Title: Seamless Object-Oriented Software Architecture: Analysis and
    Design of Reliable Systems
    Author: Kim Walden & Jean-Marc Nerson -- ISBN: 0-13-031303-3 -- PH 1994
    Short: This book describes the Business Object Notation (BON) Method
    in detail.

    Title: Reusable Software: The Base Object-Oriented Component Libraries
    Author: Bertrand Meyer -- ISBN: 0-13-245499-8 -- PH 1994
    Short: This book describes principles of library design and the
    taxonomy of fundamental computing structures. Serves as a
    manual for the EiffelBase libraries.

    Title: An Object-Oriented Environment: Principles and Application
    Author: Bertrand Meyer -- ISBN: 0-13-245507-2 -- PH 1994
    Short: This book describes the ISE EiffelBench environment as well as
    the "Melting Ice" compilation technology and the EiffelBuild
    GUI application builder.

    Title: Object-Oriented Applications
    Author: Meyer and Nerson editors -- ISBN: 0-13-013798-7 -- PH 1993
    Short: This book includes an introduction to Eiffel technology
    followed by seven in-depth descriptions of large applications
    written in Eiffel.

    Title: Eiffel: An Introduction
    Author: Robert Switzer -- ISBN: 0-13-105909-2 -- PH 1993
    Short: This book is a very clear and concise Eiffel primer, with many
    code fragments and two substantial Eiffel applications. Also
    available in French (ISBN 2-225-84-656-1).

    Title: Object Oriented Software Construction, first edition
    Author: Bertrand Meyer -- ISBN: 0-13-629049-3 -- PH 1988
    Short: An earlier edition of the second edition mentioned above, based
    on a previous version of the language.
    Also available in French, German, Italian, Dutch, etc.

    Publishers are Addison Wesley (AW) and Prentice Hall (PH).

    --------------------

    QWEB: Where can I find Eiffel on the World-Wide-Web?

    http://www.cetus-links.org/oo_eiffel.html
    Cetus Links is a directory of resources on object-oriented
    programming, including useful Eiffel pages.

    http://www.eiffel-nice.org/
    The home page of NICE, the Eiffel standardisation body.

    http://www.gobosoft.com/
    The home of the Gobo Eiffel project.

    The main vendors websites are:

    Eiffel Software http://www.eiffel.com/
    Object Tools http://www.object-tools.com/
    SmartEiffel http://smarteiffel.loria.fr/


    --------------------

    QEDI: Where can I get an Eiffel editor or emacs-mode?

    Tower Technology developed an Eiffel 3 emacs mode that supports
    syntax-directed highlighting, auto-indentation and is easily
    customized for font use, color and indentation amounts.

    The WINEDIT shareware programmer's editor offers colour syntax
    highlighting, works with Eiffel/S under MS-Windows, and is available
    from all main Windows shareware archives.

    Alan Philips' free Programmers File Editor also works with Eiffel/S
    under MS-Windows, has templates but not syntax highlighting, available
    from http://www.lancs.ac.uk/people/cpaap/pfe/

    The vim editor, an enhanced version of Unix's vi, includes Reimer
    Behrend's Eiffel syntax file as part of the standard distribution,
    from http://www.vim.org/

    An Eiffel extension to the Windows programmers editor Codewright
    from Premia implements chromacoding of Eiffel code, smart indenting
    and some templates; from http://www.nenie.org/eiffel/free/

    The commercial Windows editor TextPad (http://www.textpad.com/) has
    a number of Eiffel syntax highlighting extensions.

    --------------------

    QBON: What is BON?

    BON ("Business Object Notation") is a method for high-level analysis
    and design, offering a seamless reversible transition to an Eiffel implementation. The method emphasizes Design by Contract and
    systematic development. It is described in Walden and Nelson's book
    'Seamless Object-Oriented Software Architecture' which is available
    online at http://www.bon-method.com/ along with other resources
    on the method.

    Eiffel Software supports BON within EiffelStudio.

    --------------------

    QSTD: Are there standards for the Eiffel language?

    The definition of the Eiffel language is in the public domain. This
    definition was initially controlled by NICE, the Non-profit
    International Consortium for Eiffel, a group of Eiffel vendors
    and users. Website: http://www.eiffel-nice.org/

    The definition of the language is Bertrand Meyer's book, "Eiffel:
    The Language" (2nd Printing). This is amended for the kernel
    library (ELKS) by NICE documents: ELKS-95 with later incremental
    updates for specific classes, which are all available from NICE's
    website.

    An ECMA committee has also now been established, with a view to
    use the fast track process towards ISO standardisation. The result
    of this process will be published in the third edition of "Eiffel:
    The Language", a draft of which is reachable from Bertrand Meyer's
    page: http://www.inf.ethz.ch/personal/meyer/

    NICE is proceeding with kernel library standardisation while
    the ECMA committee deals with the core language.

    NICE membership is currently free. People interested in
    the standardisation and promotion of Eiffel can join from the web
    site. Open email lists are available for discussion on topics that
    are of interest to the Eiffel community and NICE (see the website).

    The NICE board members for 2003 are Joseph Kiniry, Frieder Monninger,
    Berend de Boer and Franck Arnaud.

    --------------------

    QPOR: How do I write portable applications?

    It is possible to achieve reasonable code portability between
    supported Eiffel compilers, when care is taken not to use proprietary
    features or new extensions or obscure features of the language
    whose implementations may vary.

    Portability between several operating systems supported by a
    given compiler is generally quite good.

    The situation is less straightforward with libraries. The
    only official library standard is the ELKS-2001 kernel standard.
    The core features and classes are portable if vendor-specific
    features are avoided, but the functionality coverage is limited.

    ELKS-2001 does not include container classes (except ARRAY). Eiffel
    Software has released its data structure library, EiffelBase, as open
    source, and some other vendors support it with their compiler but it
    does not work with others.

    Eric Bezault's open source Gobo library (http://www.gobosoft.com/) is
    probably the most widely used alternative library, and it has been
    made portable to all current compilers. It includes an EiffelBase
    emulation cluster so that most applications developed using
    EiffelBase can be ported to any compiler using Gobo. Beyond
    data structures, it includes essential functionality not
    covered in ELKS-95 and abstractions of some differences between
    Eiffel compilers.

    --------------------

    QTGV: How fast do Eiffel applications run?

    Eiffel is a statically typed object-oriented language using
    automatic memory management.

    Many Eiffel compilers make use of the static typing and perform
    extensive global optimisations producing performance comparable
    with other well-optimised statically typed languages like C++.

    Eiffel's assertions are normally enabled during development,
    and inevitably slow down execution. Assertions are not usually
    compiled in production binaries and so have no impact on the
    performance of optimised code.

    The cost of garbage collection is an often debated point, and
    large applications are often dominated by memory management rather
    than computation. In principle a style of programming assuming a GC
    could be more efficient than typical manual memory management. In
    any case, there is nothing in Eiffel making garbage collection less
    efficient than with any other language where it is used.

    --------------------

    QGRP: Are there any Eiffel user groups?

    Compiler vendors usually run user groups for their user base, often
    in the form of a mailing-list or meetings during conferences. Contact
    the individual vendors for more information.

    A number of online discussion groups about Eiffel are hosted at Eiffel Software's discussion site (http://www.talkitover.com/) and on Yahoo
    Groups (http://groups.yahoo.com/). These sites provide both e-mail and web-based interfaces.

    Many Eiffel projects are hosted at Sourceforge, the free open source
    hosting site. http://www.sourceforge.net/

    South American users of Eiffel can look at the home page of RIPLEG
    (Rio de la Plata Eiffel Group). http://www.ripleg.com.ar/

    The Colorado Eiffel User's Group meets in Denver and has a mailing
    list at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/colorado_eiffel_users/

    --------------------

    QADR: Where can I get Eiffel products and services?

    These vendors, resellers and suppliers of Eiffel training and
    consultancy are listed in alphabetical order:


    - Advanced Media Technology Ltd, http://www.eiffel.fi/
    (Jukka Haukijarvi, jukka.haukijarvi@eiffel.fi)

    - Cap Gemini France, Division ITMI, http://www.capgemini.fr/
    (Jean Marc Nerson, jnerson@capgemini.fr)

    - Class Technology Pty. Ltd., http://www.class.com.au/
    (Eiffel Desk, eiffel@class.com.au)

    - Eiffel Ireland, http://www.eiffel.ie/Eiffel/
    (Simon Parker, sparker@eiffel.ie)

    - Enea Data, http://www.enea.se/
    (Contact: eiffel@enea.se)

    - Everything Eiffel, http://www.eiffel.demon.co.uk/
    (Roger Browne, roger@eiffel.tm)

    - Information and Math Science Lab Inc., http://www.imslab.co.jp/
    (Contact: fushimi@imslab.co.jp)

    - Eiffel Software, Inc. http://www.eiffel.com/
    (Contact: info@eiffel.com)

    - Langmack & Partner, Feinarbeit, http://www.feinarbeit.de/
    (Olaf Langmack, langmack@feinarbeit.de)

    - Object Tools GmbH, http://www.object-tools.com/
    (Frieder Monninger, fm@object-tools.com)

    --------------------

    QCNF: Are there any conferences for Eiffel users?

    TOOLS is an international conference devoted to the applications of
    OO technology. It is organised by Eiffel Software and a popular conference
    with Eiffelists. EiffelStudio user group meetings occur concurrently. http://www.tools-conferences.com/

    The ACM SIGPLAN Conference On Object-Oriented Programming Systems,
    Languages and Applications (OOPSLA) is probably the largest technical conference about OO Technology.
    http://www.acm.org/sigplan/oopsla/

    ECOOP is the annual European Conference for Object-Oriented
    Programming. http://www.iam.unibe.ch/ECOOP/

    --------------------

    QECC: Why do many Eiffel implementations compile to C?

    By using C as a target language, an Eiffel implementor can:

    - bring Eiffel to the marketplace faster and at lower cost
    - port their implementation more easily to other platforms
    - take advantage of optimisation provided by the C compiler

    Much of the technology that makes Eiffel relatively simple to use also
    makes it more difficult to implement (an Eiffel-to-C compiler is
    perhaps 4 to 5 times more difficult to create than a native Pascal
    compiler).

    Compiling Eiffel to C seems to work well under Unix. C is sometimes
    thought of as the native code of Unix.

    Still, there are quite a few compilers that can compile to other
    targets, such as the Java or .NET virtual machines, or x86
    assembly language.

    --------------------

    QJVM: Where can I get an Eiffel to Java compiler?

    Since Java became fashionable, everyone wants their favourite
    language to be compiled for the JVM (Java Virtual Machine)'s byte
    code. It is tempting to think about providing Eiffel compilation
    to this platform with total interoperability between Java and Eiffel
    code.

    Unfortunately, things are not as simple as they look at first sight.
    There are fundamental differences between the Java and Eiffel object
    models (dynamic vs. static object systems, single vs. multiple
    inheritance, design by contract vs. wishful thinking, are among the
    problems).

    While it is of course possible to provide a compiler from Eiffel to
    the JVM (which is a Turing machine), it comes necessarily at a cost,
    be it performance or interoperability or both. It is unlikely in the foreseeable future to have an Eiffel to JVM compiler where it is
    possible to mix and match freely classes written in Java and Eiffel
    classes without having to worry about which language they are
    written in.

    Nevertheless, most compiler vendors are moving towards providing
    some support for the JVM, with differing limitations depending on
    the vendor and implementation strategy.

    SmartEiffel is the first compiler available to produce some
    usable result on the JVM. Eiffel Software and Object Tools
    have announced ongoing efforts to support Java.

    --------------------

    QNET: Where can I get an Eiffel to .NET compiler?

    Eiffel Software's current compiler includes the ability to
    generate code for Microsoft's Common Language Infrastructure,
    the .NET runtime environment. Eiffel Software is also
    involved in the ECMA (European Computer Manufacturers
    Association) standardisation effort for the CLI. Both
    the standalone environment and the add-on for Visual
    Studio (ENViSioN) can be used to produce .NET code.

    While the early version of this .NET target only supported a
    ad-hoc subset of Eiffel, the current version supports the
    full Eiffel language. Features of Eiffel not directly supported
    by the .NET object model, are implemented on top of the core
    features.

    --------------------

    LFEA: What features does Eiffel have?

    Eiffel is a pure, statically typed, object-oriented language. Its
    modularity is based on classes. Its most notable feature is probably
    design by contract. It brings design and programming closer together.
    It encourages maintainability and the re-use of software components.

    Eiffel offers classes, multiple inheritance, polymorphism, static
    typing and dynamic binding, genericity (constrained and
    unconstrained), a disciplined exception mechanism, systematic use of
    assertions to promote programming by contract.

    Eiffel has an elegant design and programming style, and is easy to
    learn.

    An overview is available at
    http://www.eiffel.com/doc/manuals/language/intro/

    --------------------

    LCHN: What changes have been made to the Eiffel language definition?

    Eiffel is still a relatively new language, and there have been a
    number of changes to its definition.

    There were significant changes between the publication of
    "Object-Oriented Software Construction", first edition in 1988,
    and the release of Eiffel 2.3.

    More significant changes came with the introduction of Eiffel 3, the
    current and only version of the language in use today. These changes
    are summarised in Eiffel: The Language.

    There were some less significant changes between the first
    and second printings of "Eiffel: The Language": new
    non-expanded basic types (INTEGER_REF, REAL_REF, etc), POINTER
    type to enable external references to be passed around, call to
    external routines no longer implicitly pass the current
    object as the first parameter.

    Since then the following change has been adopted and widely
    implemented:

    - The Precursor construct allows the ancestor's version of
    a redefined feature to be conveniently called (see LPAR).

    - A keyword-based notation (create/creation) for object creation
    was introduced as an alternative to the "!!" notation.

    Bertrand Meyer is currently working on Eiffel: The Language,
    third edition, which will describe a significantly updated version
    of the language, known as 'Eiffel 5'. Some of the constructs being
    introduced, like Agents (routines as a first class construct),
    have already found their way into Eiffel Software's implementation.

    The draft for this next edition is reachable from Bertand Meyer's
    home page at http://www.inf.ethz.ch/~meyer/publications/

    --------------------

    LLIB: What libraries come with Eiffel?

    All vendors aim to support the Eiffel Library Standard kernel classes.

    In addition, extensive library classes are supplied with the compilers including data structures, graphics, lexical analysis and parsing, IO, persistence, formatting, GUI and more.

    Many libraries are provided by third parties, mostly as open source
    code. There are too many to list here. A good starting point is at http://www.cetus-links.org/oo_eiffel_libraries.html

    --------------------

    LDBC: What's the big deal about preconditions and postconditions?

    The big deal is that it supports programming by contract. For example, preconditions (require clauses) are simple boolean statements that are
    used to check that the input arguments are valid and that the object
    is in a reasonable state to do the requested operation. If not, an
    exception is generated. Similarly, postconditions (ensure clauses)
    make sure that a method has successfully performed its duties, thus
    "fulfilling its contract" with the caller. Invariants are boolean
    expressions that are checked every time an object method returns back
    to a separate object.

    You can use these ideas in any OO programming language, but usually
    must supply your own assertion mechanisms or rely on programmer
    discipline. In Eiffel, the ideas are integrated into the whole fabric
    of the environment. We find them used by:

    - the exception handling mechanism.
    (Tracebacks almost always identify the correct culprit code since
    preconditions almost always denote an error in the calling method,
    while postconditions denote an error in the called method.)

    - the automatic compilation system.
    (Assertions can be disabled entirely or selectively by type on a
    per class basis.)

    - the Eiffel compiler
    (Invariants, preconditions and postconditions are all inherited in
    a manner that makes logical sense.)
    (Assertion expressions are not allowed to produce side effects so
    they can be omitted without effect.)

    - the automatic documentation tools
    (Preconditions and postconditions are important statements about
    what a method does, often effectively describing the "contract"
    between the caller and callee. Invariants can yield information
    about legal states an object can have.)

    In the future we expect to see formal methods technology work its way
    into the assertion capability. This will allow progressively more
    powerful constraints to be put into place. In addition, Meyer has
    argued in his concurrency model (see LTSK) that assertions play
    a central role in concurrent and distributed object-oriented
    programming.

    --------------------

    LCON: Please explain and discuss covariance vs. contravariance.

    Consider the following situation: we have two classes PARENT and
    CHILD. CHILD inherits from PARENT, and redefines PARENT's feature
    'foo'.

    class PARENT
    feature
    foo (arg: A) is ...
    end

    class CHILD
    inherit
    PARENT redefine foo end
    feature
    foo (arg: B) is ...
    end

    The question is: what restrictions are placed on the type of argument
    to 'foo', that is 'A' and 'B'? (If they are the same, there is no
    problem.)

    Here are two possibilities:

    (1) B must be a child of A (the covariant rule - so named because
    in the child class the types of arguments in redefined
    routines are children of types in the parent's routine, so the
    inheritance "varies" for both in the same direction)

    (2) B must be a parent of A (the contravariant rule)

    Eiffel uses the covariant rule.

    At first, the contravariant rule seems theoretically appealing. Recall
    that polymorphism means that an attribute can hold not only objects of
    its declared type, but also of any descendant (child) type. Dynamic
    binding means that a feature call on an attribute will trigger the corresponding feature call for the *actual* type of the object, which
    may be a descendant of the declared type of the attribute. With
    contravariance, we can assign an object of descendant type to an
    attribute, and all feature calls will still work because the
    descendant can cope with feature arguments at least as general as
    those of the ancestor. In fact, the descendant object is in every way
    also a fully-valid instance of the ancestor object: we are using
    inheritance to implement subtyping.

    However, in programming real-world applications we frequently need to specialize related classes jointly.

    Here is an example, where PLOT_3D inherits from PLOT, and
    DATA_SAMPLE_3D inherits from DATA_SAMPLE.

    class PLOT
    feature
    add(arg: DATA_SAMPLE) is ...

    class PLOT_3D
    inherit
    PLOT redefine add end
    feature
    add(arg: DATA_SAMPLE_3D) is ...

    This requires the covariant rule, and works well in Eiffel.

    It would fail if we were to put a PLOT_3D object into a PLOT attribute
    and try to add a DATA_SAMPLE to it. It fails because we have used
    inheritance to implement code re-use rather than subtyping, but have
    called a feature of the ancestor class on an object of the descendant
    class as if the descendant object were a true subtype. It is the
    compiler's job to detect and reject this error, to avoid the
    possibility of a run-time type error.

    Here's another example where a real-world situation suggests a
    covariant solution. Herbivores eat plants. Cows are herbivores. Grass
    is a plant. Cows eat grass but not other plants.

    class HERBIVORE class PLANT
    feature
    eat(food: PLANT) is ...
    diet: LIST[PLANT]

    class COW class GRASS
    inherit inherit
    HERBIVORE PLANT
    redefine eat
    end
    feature eat(food: GRASS) is ...

    This does what we want. The compiler must stop us from putting a COW
    object into a HERBIVORE attribute and trying to feed it a PLANT, but
    we shouldn't be trying to do this anyway.

    Also consider the container 'diet'. We are not forced to redefine this
    feature in descendant classes, because with covariant redefinition of
    the argument to 'eat', the feature 'diet' can always contain any
    object that can be eaten (e.g. grass for a cow). (With contravariant redefinition of the argument to 'eat', it would be necessary to
    re-open the parent class to make the type of the container 'diet' more general).

    To summarise: Real-world problems often lend themselves to covariant
    solutions. Eiffel handles these well. Incorrect programs in the
    presence of covariant argument redefinition can cause run-time type
    errors unless the compiler catches these.

    --------------------

    LCAT: Is it true that there are "holes" in the Eiffel type system?

    Eiffel was designed to make it possible to catch all type errors at
    compile time, so that an Eiffel program could not abort with a run time
    type error.

    However, there are some complex cases where the type checking
    is difficult. The solution in Eiffel the Language, system level
    validity checking, requires a global analysis of the whole system,
    which has proven too complex and too impractical to implement.

    Object Oriented Software Construction, second edition, offers a new
    simpler way to check for those errors that may, if refined, provide
    effective type checking but it has been questionned whether it is
    too drastic so that it will make many common patterns invalid.

    The main system-level type errors are:
    - restriction of exports in a descendant class.
    - covariant redefinition of routines parameters as in question LCON.
    - covariant signatures in conforming types of a generic class
    (like 'put' in LIST[ANY] and LIST[STRING]).
    - creation of redefined anchor types.
    - more obscure cases like selection of a feature that returns a
    precursor type in a multiple inheritance hierarchy, or
    indirect assignment of references to an expanded ancestor.

    No compiler currently available fully implements these checks and
    behaviour in those cases ranges from run-time type errors to system
    crashes.

    A comprehensive description of these issues and proposed solutions
    is described in this paper:
    http://www.inf.ethz.ch/~meyer/ongoing/covariance/recast.pdf

    --------------------

    LTSK: Is there support for concurrency in Eiffel?

    Eiffel supports concurrency in the latest specification of the
    language. The SCOOP (Simple Concurrent Object-Oriented Programming)
    model is described in chapter 30 of the book in "Object Oriented
    Software Construction 2nd edition" by Bertrand Meyer. Papers are
    also available at
    http://www.eiffel.com/doc/manuals/technology/concurrency/

    Several researchers and vendors are working towards actual
    implementations of SCOOP.

    In the meantime, most compilers also support various forms of
    multithreading independently of SCOOP.

    --------------------

    LOVL: Why doesn't Eiffel allow function overloading?

    In Eiffel, no two features of a class may have the same identifier,
    regardless of their respective signatures. This prevents the use of
    function overloading, a common programming technique in languages
    like C++.

    Eiffel is designed to be minimal: it includes exactly the features
    that its designer considered necessary, and nothing else.

    Because Eiffel already supports (single) polymorphism through its
    inheritance system, the only positive thing that function overloading
    buys you is reducing the number of feature names, at the expense of
    reducing the ability of the compiler to detect (type) errors.

    Readability is also enhanced when overloading is not possible. With
    overloading you would need to consider the type of the arguments as
    well as the type of the target before you can work out which feature
    is called. With multiple inheritance and dynamic binding this is
    awkward for a compiler and error-prone for a human.

    Having said that, the lack of overloading may force us to write some
    common mathematical operations (e.g. matrix math) in an awkward
    way, and some basic arithmetic expressions to be treated specially
    (the "arithmetic balancing rule", ETL p385).

    --------------------

    LAGE: What are Eiffel agents?

    In the early years of Eiffel, the language had no routine types
    because having routines as distinct entities outside objects
    was seen as incompatible with the OO method.

    Nevertheless, it has now been accepted that routines as first
    class objects are essential and the 'agents' facility has been
    introduced. It has been implemented at least in part in Eiffel
    Software's compiler and SmartEiffel. Other active vendors are
    likely to follow.

    While this feature is new and the standard is being finalised,
    the core concepts, routine types and tuples for representing
    the parameters and return type of a routine, are now well
    understood.

    An ordinary agent is created within the current object,
    which provides a context and makes the facility as expressive as
    higher order functions (closures) in functional programming
    languages.

    --------------------

    LATR: Why are there no class attributes in Eiffel?

    In Eiffel, the "once" function provides greater functionality in a
    more disciplined way. The body of a "once" function is executed once
    only per system (not per instance of the class), when it is first
    called. Thereafter, the "once" function returns the same Result
    without re-executing its body.

    The "once" function can therefore be used to implement a shared
    attribute of reference type (initialized on its first use).

    A "once" function can be included in a mixin class. The shared
    attribute returned by that once function is then available to all
    instances of classes which inherit from the mixin class.

    --------------------

    LPAR: How can I call the parent-class version of a redefined routine?

    This was a problem that required the use of multiple inheritance or
    synonyms with earlier versions of Eiffel, before the Precursor
    construct was introduced.

    This construct has now been implemented by all supported compilers,
    so calling a parent version of a redefined routine just requires
    using the Precursor keyword in the body of the redefinition.

    The construct is described in an a paper at http://www.eiffel.com/doc/manuals/language/precursor/

    --------------------

    LEVC: Where can I find a comparison between Eiffel and other languages?

    Ian Joyner's "C++ critique" includes a comparison between C++, Eiffel
    and other languages. It is at the following URL: http://www.progsoc.uts.edu.au/~geldridg/cpp/cppcv3.html and has also
    been published as a book, Objects Unencapsulated (see QBOK).

    In Richard Wiener's book "Software Development Using Eiffel: There can
    be life after C++" (Prentice-Hall, ISBN 0-13-100686-X).

    You can also find a comparison of Eiffel, C++, Java, and Smalltalk at http://www.eiffel.com/doc/manuals/technology/oo_comparison/

    --------------------

    LDES: Are there any destructors in Eiffel?

    Eiffel objects are garbage-collected, so that there is no need for the
    software developer to worry about whether, how and when to "destroy"
    or "free" them in the software text.

    Some implementations offer a "free" procedure for programmers who
    absolutely want to remove an object manually. Such a procedure is "use
    at your own risk" and is not needed in normal Eiffel development.

    Coming back to normal usage, the need may arise to ensure that certain operations will automatically take place whenever the garbage
    collector reclaims an object. For example if an Eiffel object
    describing a file becomes unreachable and hence is eventually garbage-collected, you may want to ensure that the physical file will
    be closed at that time. Some implementations of Eiffel provide a
    mechanism for that purpose: procedure 'dispose' from the Kernel
    Library class MEMORY.

    Whenever the garbage collector collects an object, it calls 'dispose'
    on that object. The procedure does nothing by default (so that a smart
    GC will of course avoid executing any actual call). But any class may
    inherit from MEMORY and redefine 'dispose' to perform appropriate
    actions, such as closing a file. Such actions are sometimes called "finalization". This technique achieves it conveniently.

    Because there is no guarantee as to the order in which the garbage
    collector will reclaim objects that have become unreachable, safe
    redefinitions of 'dispose' should only act on external resources such
    as file descriptors, database elements, window system resources etc,
    not on Eiffel object structures themselves.

    --------------------

    LDIS: How do I implement multiple inheritance efficiently?

    People with a background in C++ or single-inheritance languages
    often think that multiple inheritance carries a penalty because
    it cannot be implemented using the classic dispatch table scheme
    (where every polymorphic feature has a fixed position in a pointer
    table that descendants can customise without breaking any code
    using the fixed position of an ancestor's polymorphic feature.)

    There are other ways to implement inheritance which allows Eiffel
    not to suffer performance problems because of multiple inheritance.
    Eiffel compilers generally use one of two methods.

    In both cases, we need to assume that every type in the system is
    assigned an integer identifier -- the type ID.

    The first implementation is the 'sparse matrix' model. Every
    polymorphic feature has an associated pointer table with an entry
    for each type, indexed by type ID. This allows all polymorphic
    calls to be executed at the (same) cost of a single pointer
    dereferencing.

    The immediate drawback of this, is that it generates a rather big
    data table (a matrix of all polymorphic routines per all types in
    a system). Fortunately, there are sparse matrix algorithms allowing
    to compress these tables efficiently by carefully selecting the IDs
    (an evident optimisation is to try to group all descendant next
    to their parent so that only a short section of the type ID space
    need be covered).

    The other method is completely different and uses the equivalent of
    an inspect statement on the type ID, calling the appropriate static
    function for each concrete type. In this case, it is obvious that the
    compiler needs a global knowlegde of the system: for each polymorphic
    routine call, it needs to know all concrete subtypes really used in
    the system, and all redefinitions of the routines.

    At first sight, it could be thought that the inspect statement could
    slow down the system. Actual compilers using this solution have proved
    that they can be as efficient as (or more than) those implemented
    using the first method.

    It should now be clear that, for both methods, it is necessary
    for the compiler to have at compile time -- or at the very least at optimisation time -- a view of the complete system. This could appear
    like a serious restriction but it is not much of a concern because
    Eiffel compilers must have this view in the first place in order to
    be able to differenciate between static and polymorphic routines --
    all routines being potentially polymorphic in Eiffel -- and this
    must be done to have compiled systems perform reasonably.

    --------------------

    LISA: How does the `Iterating several actions' example in ETL work?

    The example code page 176 of Eiffel: The Language, 2nd printing does
    not work with any widely available compiler. It has confused and
    puzzled many newcomers to the language and what it is supposed to
    do is not clearly defined in the book.

    What the example should do is as follows. When a feature is replicated
    under multiple inheritance (renamed so that the feature is now known
    under two names) and in the same inheritance clause a routine or
    attribute its source text references is also replicated, the routine
    body of the first feature should be adapted to call the corresponding replicated features on each path of the inheritance. The mechanism
    is not intended to scale to more complex cases where the replication
    does not occur in a single inheritance clause.

    This feature is now considered obsolete because agents (see LAGE) are
    now available and provide a more convenient solution for this pattern.

    --------------------

    LORB: Is COM/CORBA supported?

    COM or CORBA support is not built into the language. Most
    commercial vendors supporting Windows have a COM package
    that is tied to their compiler.

    There is an open source CORBA object request broker,
    MICO/E, at http://www.math.uni-goettingen.de/micoe/

    2ab, Inc., at http://www.2ab.com/, has an Eiffel
    binding for their CORBA package which works with ISE
    Eiffel.

    --- Synchronet 3.18b-Win32 NewsLink 1.113