From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.system

I don't have a Intel Mac. But wanted to know if it has been a pleasant experience for those that have tried it?

--- Synchronet 3.18b-Win32 NewsLink 1.113

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.system

henree21@yahoo.com wrote:

I don't have a Intel Mac. But wanted to know if it has been a pleasant experience for those that have tried it?

I don't have a Mactel either, but I have six PPC Macs with OS X and a
laptop with XP Pro SP2.

XP Pro works OK for me, but with it's toad-ugly, non-intuitive
interface, and stability not up to OS X standards, it would be a bit of
a stretch to say that using it is "pleasant."

I will, however, need Windows for the forseeable future, and I'm going
to start replacing my PPC Macs with Mactels in the fall, when I expect
that OS X/Windows virtualization (running side-by-side, not
dual-booting) will be quite mature, and a better experience than it is
today. But Windoze will still be Windoze.

Davoud

--
usenet *at* davidillig dawt com
--- Synchronet 3.18b-Win32 NewsLink 1.113

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.system

In article <1144908285.076001.230600@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>,
henree21@yahoo.com wrote:

I don't have a Intel Mac. But wanted to know if it has been a pleasant experience for those that have tried it?

I use XP at work.

No, it is not a pleasant experience. I had to force quite IE nine times yesterday, and twice Acrobat Reader brought the whole computer to its
knees for extended periods. And this is a workstation maintained by IT professionals with special startup scripts that are supposed to make
sure everything is kosher.

Although it's still better than Solaris, used via Exceed, where the
waveform panel in Modelsim kept mysteriously vanishing. I actually
prefer to use command line scripting in Unix because the GUIs found
there are hideous abominations.
--- Synchronet 3.18b-Win32 NewsLink 1.113

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.system

I recently bought a MacMini and was comfortably making the switch from
XP to mac. Then 3 days later Apple released BootCamp. I immediately
installed XP on my mac assuming that I would run all my old programs in
XP mode where intel native (universal) or just OSX versions were
unavailable.

XP itself works great. As fast as any standard PC, for comparison it
appears a hell of a lot faster on my Mac than on my AMD 2000+, 512Mb PC
I was using before.

But that was then and this is now.....

I have used XP for a total of about 15 minutes since, as everything i
need to do I can do in OSX, in a much more pleasant, stable and
comfortable environment.

Overall, there is little to distinguish a Mac based XP install with a
PC one.

--- Synchronet 3.18b-Win32 NewsLink 1.113

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.system

In article <1144908285.076001.230600@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>,
henree21@yahoo.com wrote:

I don't have a Intel Mac. But wanted to know if it has been a pleasant experience for those that have tried it?

I don't know if I'd call it pleasant, but it works. It's surrealistic
hearing the Windows chimes and seeing a Windows desktop on a Mac. But it *does* work. And more to the point, Matlab, which doesn't really run in
Mac OS under Intel (you can do a command-line version, but no GUI), runs beautifully in XP. Many of our researchers rely on Matlab, so this is
crucial for us.

--
AF
--- Synchronet 3.18b-Win32 NewsLink 1.113

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.system

In article <130420060814586680%star@sky.net>, Davoud <star@sky.net> writes:

henree21@yahoo.com wrote:

I don't have a Intel Mac. But wanted to know if it has been a pleasant
experience for those that have tried it?

I don't have a Mactel either, but I have six PPC Macs with OS X and a
laptop with XP Pro SP2.

XP Pro works OK for me, but with it's toad-ugly, non-intuitive
interface, and stability not up to OS X standards, it would be a bit of
a stretch to say that using it is "pleasant."

Toads everywhere should take offense to you insulting them with Weendoze.

--
VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)COM

"Well my son, life is like a beanstalk, isn't it?"
--- Synchronet 3.18b-Win32 NewsLink 1.113

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.system

lets call a spade a spade here, I just bought a new mactel, and I LOVE
it, I have no need to install XP, BUT, XP seems to be as stable as
anything else these days, as long as it isn't buggered up with malware
and viruses. My XP machine ran day in and day out with no crashes, no
reboots, and no problems, there would be the occasional application
that would hang, and I would have to kill it with task manager, but the
same has happened twice on my new mac with Microsoft Office 2004.
The only time I ever needed to reboot the XP machine, was when a
software install needed it to. Other than that it ran fine. Also I am
an IT manager, and I have an IBM i-series, and a half dozen Windows
servers, running advanced server 2003, no problems there either, I
reboot about every 6 months just for good measure, but they run day in
and day out, on Dell Poweredge rackmount servers.

two shiny penny's there for ya
Jerry

--- Synchronet 3.18b-Win32 NewsLink 1.113