On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 16:44:13 +0100, Joerg Lorenz wrote:
Am 13.11.20 um 01:19 schrieb Alan Baker:
On 2020-11-12 4:17 p.m., Arlen Holder wrote:
o Apple has confirmed it's automatically scanning images backed up to
iCloud
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/VkODI4K1SC8>
A lie.
Plain and simple.
Stop feeding this sick Troll.
What's amazing is how...
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 14:40:47 -0000 (UTC), Matt wrote:
What shocks me is the utter lack of adult comprehension on this ng.
Common sense is eluded for some when there are economic reasons.
Hi Matt,
Using my adult comprehensive skills, the topic, as I see it, is
On Mon, 21 Dec 2020 10:23:06 -0800, sms wrote:
Prior to the iPhone 8, the power conversion circuitry was not designed
to cope with a battery that had capacity issues. This has been fixed
beginning with the iPhone 8. The workaround on the iPhone 6, 6s, and 7
is a replacement battery. Technically it's not a battery issue, a
properly designed power circuit would not have this problem and could
still provide sufficient power to the CPU and other components.
The "chemical aging" explanation by Apple was not the real story.
The best explanation I've seen published on this is here
<https://mjtsai.com/blog/2017/12/22/apple-confirms-that-it-throttles-iphones-with-degraded-batteries/>:
This is a _perfect_ example of why Steve Scharf is a Type II apologist!
Steve is a Type II apologist, which simply means he's not malicious, per
se, nor is he stupid, per se (not anymore than most liberal arts majors
that is), nor is Steve forming his belief system only on what Marketing
feeds him, nor does Steve consider Apple the embodiment of his self worth, etc., (like the Type III apologists do).
Nope.
o Steve is a Type II apologist mainly because he can't process facts.
The fact is that the iPhone 8 has throttling software, which was
implemented in the iOS update of October 31, 2019, as does the iPhone X.
The chemical aging excuse was pure bullshit on the part of Apple, particularly since only _some_ iPhones have the problem, but even more so, because Apple only admits to the truth in court.
And in court, Apple paid the _criminal_ fine for purposefully knowingly and secretly slowing down iPhones for the express purpose of selling more iPhones.
What are the common well-verified psychological traits of the typical iOS poster on this newsgroup?
The question is a psychological one where the Apple Apologists have, for decades, almost all exhibited the following common traits which have caused endless discussions because Apple Apologists don't seem to like facts.
Here are the nine commonly exhibited traits of *all* the Apple Apologists:
* They're never purposefully helpful whenever they don't like the question
* They brazenly & repeatedly fabricate wholly imaginary iOS functionality
* They then exclaim that they told us many times how to do it! :)
* They always "just guess" where their credibility is worthless
* They almost never back up their statements with any referenced facts
* They incessantly play silly childish word games when faced with facts
* They consistently fabricate quoted content that never happened
* Then they respond to that imaginary quoted content as if it did!
* They consistently blame Android for the lack of functionality on iOS
What's psychologically interesting is that in this post, Savageduck yet again blames Android for an OP's inability to do what he wants using iOS! <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/ooCFANY5CAAJ>
The OP of that thread concurred, that it was Android's fault that he couldn't copy an app from one iOS device to another! <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/7Qqc3f1dCAAJ>
Meanwhile, Jolly Roger yet again wholly fabricated imaginary iOS functionality for the poor OP to attempt to follow (and fail), since both nospam and Jolly Roger incessantly fabricate iOS functionality that just doesn't exist, whenever they see a technical question that they don't like. <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/SGhljjBYCAAJ> <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/VqzlcQ0hCAAJ>
When the OP tried Jolly Roger's fabricated method, is it any surprise it failed? <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/C78-NjwnCAAJ>
NOTE: Often Jolly Roger responds with hate-filled fifth-grade vitriol when confronted with facts, but in this particular test thread, he remained calm so we won't add that to the common traits.
Of course, nospam not only fabricates imaginary iOS functionality: <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/Cf3bIIcQCAAJ> <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/1YHAnJEnCAAJ> <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/jsxtlTchCAAJ> <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/3naulH4cCAAJ> But nospam also claims that he's told us how to do (what can't be done)
many times, and we just won't listen to him. <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/yk6sP4I2CAAJ> And even better, nospam claims that people have been successful with their imaginary iOS functioanlity! <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/HZYE3iscCAAJ>
And yet, I told the OP it can't be done (because it can't be done). <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/7rHAL_QXCAAJ>
And so did sms, who is another credible poster on the iOS newsgroups who is almost never wrong simply because he speaks facts. (Facts are funny that way.) <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/u21p0MMaCAAJ>
Meanwhile, David Empson, the most knowedgeable and credible poster on the iOs newsgroups by far, backed up what both sms and I said: <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/z3kVVoc-CAAJ>
Hence, the question is a psychological one where the Apple Apologists have, for decades, almost all exhibited the following common traits:
* They're never purposefully helpful whenever they don't like the question
* They brazenly & repeatedly fabricate wholly imaginary iOS functionality
* They then exclaim that they told us many times how to do it! :)
* They always "just guess" where their credibility is worthless
* They almost never back up their statements with any referenced facts
* They incessantly play silly childish word games when faced with facts
* They consistently fabricate quoted content that never happened
* Then they respond to that imaginary quoted content as if it did!
* They consistently blame Android for the lack of functionality on iOS
Are those the common psychological traits of all the Apple Apologists?
Your number, even tied to your name, is in a public
database.
What are the common well-verified psychological traits of the typical iOS poster on this newsgroup?
The question is a psychological one where the Apple Apologists have, for decades, almost all exhibited the following common traits which have caused endless discussions because Apple Apologists don't seem to like facts.
Here are the nine commonly exhibited traits of *all* the Apple Apologists:
* They're never purposefully helpful whenever they don't like the question
* They brazenly & repeatedly fabricate wholly imaginary iOS functionality
* They then exclaim that they told us many times how to do it! :)
* They always "just guess" where their credibility is worthless
* They almost never back up their statements with any referenced facts
* They incessantly play silly childish word games when faced with facts
* They consistently fabricate quoted content that never happened
* Then they respond to that imaginary quoted content as if it did!
* They consistently blame Android for the lack of functionality on iOS
What's psychologically interesting is that in this post, Savageduck yet again blames Android for an OP's inability to do what he wants using iOS! <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/ooCFANY5CAAJ>
The OP of that thread concurred, that it was Android's fault that he couldn't copy an app from one iOS device to another! <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/7Qqc3f1dCAAJ>
Meanwhile, Jolly Roger yet again wholly fabricated imaginary iOS functionality for the poor OP to attempt to follow (and fail), since both nospam and Jolly Roger incessantly fabricate iOS functionality that just doesn't exist, whenever they see a technical question that they don't like. <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/SGhljjBYCAAJ> <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/VqzlcQ0hCAAJ>
When the OP tried Jolly Roger's fabricated method, is it any surprise it failed? <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/C78-NjwnCAAJ>
NOTE: Often Jolly Roger responds with hate-filled fifth-grade vitriol when confronted with facts, but in this particular test thread, he remained calm so we won't add that to the common traits.
Of course, nospam not only fabricates imaginary iOS functionality: <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/Cf3bIIcQCAAJ> <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/1YHAnJEnCAAJ> <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/jsxtlTchCAAJ> <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/3naulH4cCAAJ> But nospam also claims that he's told us how to do (what can't be done)
many times, and we just won't listen to him. <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/yk6sP4I2CAAJ> And even better, nospam claims that people have been successful with their imaginary iOS functioanlity! <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/HZYE3iscCAAJ>
And yet, I told the OP it can't be done (because it can't be done). <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/7rHAL_QXCAAJ>
And so did sms, who is another credible poster on the iOS newsgroups who is almost never wrong simply because he speaks facts. (Facts are funny that way.) <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/u21p0MMaCAAJ>
Meanwhile, David Empson, the most knowedgeable and credible poster on the iOs newsgroups by far, backed up what both sms and I said: <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/z3kVVoc-CAAJ>
Hence, the question is a psychological one where the Apple Apologists have, for decades, almost all exhibited the following common traits:
* They're never purposefully helpful whenever they don't like the question
* They brazenly & repeatedly fabricate wholly imaginary iOS functionality
* They then exclaim that they told us many times how to do it! :)
* They always "just guess" where their credibility is worthless
* They almost never back up their statements with any referenced facts
* They incessantly play silly childish word games when faced with facts
* They consistently fabricate quoted content that never happened
* Then they respond to that imaginary quoted content as if it did!
* They consistently blame Android for the lack of functionality on iOS
Are those the common psychological traits of all the Apple Apologists?
On 2020-01-18 10:17 a.m., Arlen Holder wrote:
o Yet again, ...
You spam your replies across multiple groups, Liar.
On 2020-01-18 10:17 a.m., Arlen Holder wrote:
o Yet again, ...
You spam your replies across multiple groups, Liar.
On 2020-01-18 10:17 a.m., Arlen Holder wrote:
o Yet again, ...
You spam your replies across multiple groups, Liar.
On 2020-01-18 10:17 a.m., Arlen Holder wrote:
o Yet again, ...
You spam your replies across multiple groups, Liar.
On 2020-01-18 10:17 a.m., Arlen Holder wrote:
o Yet again, ...
You spam your replies across multiple groups, Liar.
On 2020-01-18 10:17 a.m., Arlen Holder wrote:
o Yet again, ...
You spam your replies across multiple groups, Liar.
On 2020-01-18 10:17 a.m., Arlen Holder wrote:
o Yet again, ...
You spam your replies across multiple groups, Liar.
On 2020-01-18 10:17 a.m., Arlen Holder wrote:
o Yet again, ...
You spam your replies across multiple groups, Liar.
On 2020-01-18 10:17 a.m., Arlen Holder wrote:
o Yet again, ...
You spam your replies across multiple groups, Liar.
On 2020-01-18 10:17 a.m., Arlen Holder wrote:
o Yet again, ...
You spam your replies across multiple groups, Liar.
Sysop: | Gate Keeper |
---|---|
Location: | Shelby, NC |
Users: | 790 |
Nodes: | 20 (0 / 20) |
Uptime: | 40:19:55 |
Calls: | 12,115 |
Calls today: | 5 |
Files: | 5,294 |
D/L today: |
72 files (9,959K bytes) |
Messages: | 564,933 |