MvdV>> You are not the first, I was before you.

Nope.

So you still don't know the difference between the network and the human interface? The network (node to node) is per definition compatible with whatever character encoding you try to pass on. Just as Michiel tried to tell you.

The human interface (usually an editor) is a completely different story.



..

--- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; sv-SE; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101125
* Origin: news://eljaco.se (2:203/2)

-={ 2021-04-03 22:39:53.663989435+00:00 }=-

Hey Björn!

The human interface (usually an editor) is a completely different story.

Given the subject of concern is packed MSGs and the ability to actually post valid utf-8 characters then your reply is way out in left field and if indeed you are talking for Michiel then what you are saying has nothing to do with his ability to actually post utf-8 characters in a packed MSG which is what these MSGs are, including your reply. In this case the editor *is* the story which makes your reply a completely different story.

Speaking of which, what's your point?

Life is good,
Maurice

... Ne læt þu no unlofod þæt þu swytele ongite þæt licwyrðe sie.
Do not leave unpraised anything you know well to be worthy.
--- GNU bash, version 5.1.4(1)-release (x86_64-motorshed-linux-gnu)
* Origin: Little Mikey's Brain - Ladysmith BC, Canada (1:153/7001)

Speaking of which, what's your point?

Yeah, right. Why did I even bother to try to educate you? Not feeding the troll is the mantra at hand...

Sorry Mr. Moderator, it will not happen again.




..

--- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; sv-SE; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101125
* Origin: news://eljaco.se (2:203/2)