http://www.lik-sang.com/info.php?category=53&products_id=639&PHPSESSID=9d064 >fbf4cc8ebc0ce641bdbf4d4cad8
$70 is still a lot considering that Radio Shack used to sell an RF modulator >for $20 that will do the same thing, it just requires a +12 VDC source. >Similarly, a person could just route the composite signal to the video input >port of a VCR.
I'm interested in trying to preserve the "crispness" of an RGB setup, and I >find that a good LCD monitor doesn't produce nearly as much eye strain after >many hours of use as a traditional monitors.
"Michael Pender" <mpender@hotmail.com> wrote:
http://www.lik-sang.com/info.php?category=53&products_id=639&PHPSESSID=9d064 >>fbf4cc8ebc0ce641bdbf4d4cad8
$70 is still a lot considering that Radio Shack used to sell an RF modulator >>for $20 that will do the same thing, it just requires a +12 VDC source. >>Similarly, a person could just route the composite signal to the video input >>port of a VCR.
I'm interested in trying to preserve the "crispness" of an RGB setup, and I >>find that a good LCD monitor doesn't produce nearly as much eye strain after >>many hours of use as a traditional monitors.
You are right. To use IIGS software, you need RGB.
The composite video output is too fuzzy to read.
Even S-Video is not quite up to the task. There was
a device called the Video Turtle that converted the
RGB output to S-Video. IIGS software was actually
usable on a TV with S-Video with this device but it
still lacked crispness of RGB.
Now that the future is obviously HDTV and pretty
much all televisions in the next few years will have
component video input, it seems obvious that a
IIGS RGB to component video converter is the
answer because component video is still 15kHz
but has the sharpness of the IIGS RGB.
Sysop: | Gate Keeper |
---|---|
Location: | Shelby, NC |
Users: | 764 |
Nodes: | 20 (0 / 20) |
Uptime: | 41:00:45 |
Calls: | 11,275 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 5,288 |
D/L today: |
81 files (10,064K bytes) |
Messages: | 521,283 |