I've been told that it is 'impossible' to read Apple-formatted 3.5"
disks on a PC because of the difference in formats. However, since
there are tools such as TransMac, MacDrive 98 and MacOpen 2000 that
can read Mac 3.5" HD floppies on PCs, the argument that it is
'impossible' seems a little less persuasive.
If there really is a limitation that prevents reading Apple-formatted
3.5" DSDD disks on a PC's 3.5" drive, I would guess that it is
related to the variable spin rates of the Apple's 3.5" drive. Can
anyone point me to a reference on the variable speed drives?
Paul Schlyter wrote:
PC floppy drives have
never been able to read GCR disks and will never be.
Unless of course you are lucky enough to get your hands on an old
Central Point Copy II option board.
In article <yLtQa.13001$D%1.10374@nwrddc01.gnilink.net>,
Michael Pender <mpender@hotmail.com> wrote:
The incompatibility in disk format which makes it impossible to read
Apple disks in standard PC hardware is at the lowest-level encoding:
the Apple II used GCR whihe the PC uses MFM. Early Macs used GCR
too; later MFM disks were used by Mac but a lot of Macs have floppy
drives capable of reading GCR disks too. PC floppy drives have
never been able to read GCR disks and will never be.
Paul Schlyter <pausch@saaf.se> wrote in message news:betttj$1b9n$1@merope.saaf.se...
In article <yLtQa.13001$D%1.10374@nwrddc01.gnilink.net>,
Michael Pender <mpender@hotmail.com> wrote:
The incompatibility in disk format which makes it impossible to read
Apple disks in standard PC hardware is at the lowest-level encoding:
the Apple II used GCR whihe the PC uses MFM. Early Macs used GCR
too; later MFM disks were used by Mac but a lot of Macs have floppy
drives capable of reading GCR disks too. PC floppy drives have
never been able to read GCR disks and will never be.
Is a reference available that outlines the differences between GCR and MFM? If that is the only difference, then it should be possible to read/write PC-format disks on an Apple II, even if the opposite is not true.
Paul Schlyter <pausch@saaf.se> wrote in message news:betttj$1b9n$1@merope.saaf.se...
In article <yLtQa.13001$D%1.10374@nwrddc01.gnilink.net>,
Michael Pender <mpender@hotmail.com> wrote:
The incompatibility in disk format which makes it impossible to read
Apple disks in standard PC hardware is at the lowest-level encoding:
the Apple II used GCR whihe the PC uses MFM. Early Macs used GCR
too; later MFM disks were used by Mac but a lot of Macs have floppy
drives capable of reading GCR disks too. PC floppy drives have
never been able to read GCR disks and will never be.
Is a reference available that outlines the differences between GCR and MFM? If that is the only difference, then it should be possible to read/write PC-format disks on an Apple II, even if the opposite is not true.
Charlie <charlied@NOSPAMbboard.com> wrote in message news:bevseq01g3@enews2.newsguy.com...
It is my understanding that Apple 5.25" drives cannot read/write MFM
at all.
I don't see why not - the Apple 5.25" drive is controlled entirely by software.
With a change to the software it should be able to read MFM disks
without difficulty.
Of course, saying that it is *possible* is very different than
saying its worth the time to do.
Paul Schlyter wrote:
PC floppy drives have
never been able to read GCR disks and will never be.
Unless of course you are lucky enough to get your hands on an old
Central Point Copy II option board.
sean wrote:
Paul Schlyter wrote:
PC floppy drives have
never been able to read GCR disks and will never be.
Unless of course you are lucky enough to get your hands on an old
Central Point Copy II option board.
Hmm. I have one of these. However, I'm not aware that the support
software lets you read files from, e.g. a IIgs 3.5" disk. Wasn't it
just intended for full-disk copying?
Speaking of new hardware, or rather, different old hardware, you
could pick up an Amiga 1000 and an Amiga 1020 5.25 inch drive and copy directly from 5.25 Apple disks in the A1020 to MS/DOS 3.5 inch
standard density disks in the internal 3.5 inch drive of the A1000.
In article <FTaRa.1576$KZ.854103@news1.news.adelphia.net>,
Steven N. Hirsch <shirsch@adelphia.net> wrote:
sean wrote:
Paul Schlyter wrote:
PC floppy drives have
never been able to read GCR disks and will never be.
Unless of course you are lucky enough to get your hands on an old
Central Point Copy II option board.
Hmm. I have one of these. However, I'm not aware that the support
software lets you read files from, e.g. a IIgs 3.5" disk. Wasn't it
just intended for full-disk copying?
I think he meant the capability of the hardware and not necessarily
the accompanying software. You can always write your own software,
but it's much harder to build your own hardware.... :-)
In article <FTaRa.1576$KZ.854103@news1.news.adelphia.net>,
Steven N. Hirsch <shirsch@adelphia.net> wrote:
sean wrote:
Paul Schlyter wrote:
PC floppy drives have
never been able to read GCR disks and will never be.
Unless of course you are lucky enough to get your hands on an old
Central Point Copy II option board.
Hmm. I have one of these. However, I'm not aware that the support
software lets you read files from, e.g. a IIgs 3.5" disk. Wasn't it
just intended for full-disk copying?
I think he meant the capability of the hardware and not necessarily
the accompanying software. You can always write your own software,
but it's much harder to build your own hardware.... :-)
Paul Schlyter wrote:
In article <FTaRa.1576$KZ.854103@news1.news.adelphia.net>,
Steven N. Hirsch <shirsch@adelphia.net> wrote:
sean wrote:
Paul Schlyter wrote:
PC floppy drives have
never been able to read GCR disks and will never be.
Unless of course you are lucky enough to get your hands on an old
Central Point Copy II option board.
Hmm. I have one of these. However, I'm not aware that the support
software lets you read files from, e.g. a IIgs 3.5" disk. Wasn't it
just intended for full-disk copying?
I think he meant the capability of the hardware and not necessarily
the accompanying software. You can always write your own software,
but it's much harder to build your own hardware.... :-)
Considering that it would be necessary to write RWTS
and a pretty complete file system (or two) in x86 code,
I think this may be yet another case where the hardware is the
easyware and the software is the hardware. ;-)
Anyone wanting to attempt that are free to borrow as much C codehttp://home.tiscali.se/pausch/apple2/)
as they want from my FID.C (available at
to access an Apple DOS file system.
"Paul Schlyter" <pausch@saaf.se> wrote in message news:bfm3n4$gvv$1@merope.saaf.se...
Anyone wanting to attempt that are free to borrow as much C code
as they want from my FID.C (available at
http://home.tiscali.se/pausch/apple2/)
to access an Apple DOS file system.
It is a kind offer, but since the FID code works with DSK images instead of dealing with physical disks I don't think the code would really help.
What we really need is source code for a track editor for the IBM PC and
the Apple. The code of a program like Locksmith that deals with nibble- based protection schemes would take us a long way.
"Paul Schlyter" <pausch@saaf.se> wrote in message news:bfmno3$1a2m$1@merope.saaf.se...
In article <BvATa.56060$EZ2.15949@nwrddc01.gnilink.net>,
news.verizon.net <mpender@hotmail.com> wrote:
ofIt is a kind offer, but since the FID code works with DSK images instead
dealing with physical disks I don't think the code would really help.
You have obviously not looked at that code.....
It has a (logical) "Read Sector" function, which of course only
indexes into the DSK image and copies a 256-byte block from there.
But if you replace that with a function which reads a real sector off
a real disk, then the file system parts ought to work fine if it's an
Apple DOS 3.3 disk. Yep, I had that possibility in mind when I wrote
that code .... no I don't have any concrete plans in that direction,
but OTOH you'll never know what use your code may find.
The "function which reads a real sector" is the part that's hard to write. Once we can read the physical media, the process of making a DSK file is a piece of cake.
- Mike
In article <20030723040500.21622.00000401@mb-m07.aol.com>,
Michael J. Mahon <mjmahon@aol.com> wrote:
Paul Schlyter wrote:
In article <FTaRa.1576$KZ.854103@news1.news.adelphia.net>,
Steven N. Hirsch <shirsch@adelphia.net> wrote:
sean wrote:
Paul Schlyter wrote:
PC floppy drives have
never been able to read GCR disks and will never be.
Unless of course you are lucky enough to get your hands on an old
Central Point Copy II option board.
Hmm. I have one of these. However, I'm not aware that the support
software lets you read files from, e.g. a IIgs 3.5" disk. Wasn't it
just intended for full-disk copying?
I think he meant the capability of the hardware and not necessarily
the accompanying software. You can always write your own software,
but it's much harder to build your own hardware.... :-)
Considering that it would be necessary to write RWTS
Only if the hardware is as stupid as the standard Apple II disk
"controller" (which was only a rudimentary disk controller really;
the Apple II RWTS was the actual "disk controller"). With any real
disk controller chip, you just set some parameters in the disk
controller, then give it a memory address and tell it to read one or
several consecutive sectors into a buffer starting at that address.
and a pretty complete file system (or two) in x86 code,
Anyone wanting to attempt that are free to borrow as much C code
as they want from my FID.C (available at >http://home.tiscali.se/pausch/apple2/)
to access an Apple DOS file system.
I think this may be yet another case where the hardware is the
easyware and the software is the hardware. ;-)
Only if the software really would require a complex RWTS equivalent
and the hardware contained only standard components which you could
buy fairly easily. But when I said "build your own hardware" I was
more thinking of constructing and mask programming your own LSI
chips....... it's not impossible, but it's definitely not for the
faint hearted to do such a thing.
But before speculating more, we need to know more about the hardware:
does it contain a real disk controller in hardware, which is at least >reasonably "intelligent"? Or does it contain only a rudimentary disk >controller in hardware, like the Apple II did?
Sysop: | Gate Keeper |
---|---|
Location: | Shelby, NC |
Users: | 764 |
Nodes: | 20 (0 / 20) |
Uptime: | 41:08:13 |
Calls: | 11,275 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 5,288 |
D/L today: |
82 files (10,175K bytes) |
Messages: | 521,283 |