OK, remove any and all expansion cards from your PCI, AGP and ISA slots,
and tell me how good your PC's graphics capability is.
But it is simply my job to ensure you all realise that the Commode 64 is >utter crap. It was a useless machine, ugly, expensive, and just plain crap.
Once you all realise this, you will lead happier lives.
The Starglider wrote ...
But it is simply my job to ensure you all realise that the Commode 64 is >>utter crap. It was a useless machine, ugly, expensive, and just plain crap. >>
Once you all realise this, you will lead happier lives.
Typical babbling of 12 year-old gibberish.
Once Starglider realizes this, he/she/it will lead a happier life.
On 16 Jul 2003 14:27:54 -0700, yihq@2nybbles.com (Zed Yago) wrote:
The Speckdrum might have the more queer Fellowship,Which was still more advanced and faster the the piece of shit that ran
but it still has only a Z80.
your commodes.
Couldn't be. We have class, and taste, and that's why we know that the C64is
crap.
So, so far, not one single commode user has come up with a decent argument
to attempt to prove to us that the Commode 64 was actually any good (which
it isn't).
So, that must mean, that there is a lot of truth in what I said about it. >Crap games, crap graphics, crap sound, crap design, crap cost (when >released).
I'm utterly stunned it lasted as long as it did!
I realised when I was 12, that no matter how much I tried, I couldn't find >any use for the commode.
The Starglider wrote ...crap.
But it is simply my job to ensure you all realise that the Commode 64 is >utter crap. It was a useless machine, ugly, expensive, and just plain
Once you all realise this, you will lead happier lives.
Typical babbling of 12 year-old gibberish.
Once Starglider realizes this, he/she/it will lead a happier life.
Best regards,
Sam Gillett aka Mars Probe @ Starship Intrepid 1-972-221-4088
Last 8-bit BBS in the Dallas area. Commodore lives!
The Starglider aka Wibble wrote ...
So, so far, not one single commode user has come up with a decent argument >>to attempt to prove to us that the Commode 64 was actually any good (which >>it isn't).
So, that must mean, that there is a lot of truth in what I said about it. >>Crap games, crap graphics, crap sound, crap design, crap cost (when >>released).
I'm utterly stunned it lasted as long as it did!
Stuff like that, written by the winner of the "Wibble of the Year" award, is >a good endorsement for the greatness of the Commodore 64.
The Starglider wrote ...
I realised when I was 12, that no matter how much I tried, I couldn't find >>any use for the commode.
Are you paper trained, or do you go outside?
The Starglider aka Wibble wrote ...argument
So, so far, not one single commode user has come up with a decent
(whichto attempt to prove to us that the Commode 64 was actually any good
isit isn't).
So, that must mean, that there is a lot of truth in what I said about it. >Crap games, crap graphics, crap sound, crap design, crap cost (when >released).
I'm utterly stunned it lasted as long as it did!
Stuff like that, written by the winner of the "Wibble of the Year" award,
a good endorsement for the greatness of the Commodore 64.
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 02:19:03 GMT, "Sam Gillett" <samgillett@msn.com> wrote:specs
Are you paper trained, or do you go outside?
No, I go outside to the commode, looks like a little beige box with crap
and piss all over it.
The Starglider wibbled in message ...
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 02:19:03 GMT, "Sam Gillett" <samgillett@msn.com>
wrote:
Are you paper trained, or do you go outside?No, I go outside to the commode, looks like a little beige box with crap
specs and piss all over it.
Sorry to hear that your ZX faded so much from being left out in the weather so long.
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 19:26:16 -0400, "Decimal Cat" <wells@acadia.net> wrote:
Just because you say it doesn't make it so.Well, since I've put up a decent argument, why don't you come up with some >valid points, instead of just saying "Oh, is that all you can do?". It just >shows that you actually have nothing worthwhile to say.
Is this really all you can find to do?
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 18:14:53 -0500, "Dave Dahle" <dd-ah-le@dtg.net> wrote:
Now - a historical question - since this is apparently an "annual" >>"tradition", I wonder which side has inaugurated more flamewars?We have (or rather I have), and damned proud of it too!
Terrible graphics - 15 shades of brown, and really *REALLY* blocky
graphics.
Let's just compromise, and use Starglider as a doorstop. :)
The Great Wibble wrote ...
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 18:14:53 -0500, "Dave Dahle" <dd-ah-le@dtg.net> wrote:
Now - a historical question - since this is apparently an "annual" >>>"tradition", I wonder which side has inaugurated more flamewars?We have (or rather I have), and damned proud of it too!
I noticed that at least two "amateur" trolls tried to start a flamewar, but >failed. How does it feel to be a Professional Troll?
Sam Gillett wrote in <9OKRa.16692$EZ2.3684@nwrddc01.gnilink.net>:
Stuff like that, written by the winner of the "Wibble of the Year"
award
[...]
Sounds as though you have been brainwashed by The Great Wibble and know >>little of the truth.
I expect you're not too bothered about catching up on two decades of
Sinclair folklore at this point, but a bit of friendly advice here: the >concept of "wibble" is in fact one of the Spectrum's finest contributions
to geek culture (look, it's in the Jargon File and everything - >http://www.faqs.org/docs/jargon/W/wibble.html ) . As such, attempting to
use it as an insult is likely to be about as effective as, say, the use of >the word 'breadbin' in reference to the C64.
You see, this is exactly the attitude you should have, it's fun!
That's why we have this war every year!
It's tradition!
| Sysop: | Gate Keeper |
|---|---|
| Location: | Shelby, NC |
| Users: | 764 |
| Nodes: | 20 (0 / 20) |
| Uptime: | 40:55:49 |
| Calls: | 11,275 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 5,288 |
| D/L today: |
81 files (10,064K bytes) |
| Messages: | 521,283 |