From Newsgroup: comp.sys.cbm
"sentinel" <
sentinel@graffitti.net> wrote in message news:<LKCOa.34356$
C83.2884689@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net>...
sign please! thanks very much, its very appreciated ...
http://dizzypetition.members.easyspace.com/
Bring Back that Loveable EGG!
Just had a look at that page, and what do I see at the very top?:
<quote>- The Dizzy Petition will end in September -
When this happens a NEW Petition will be created</quote>
In other words, it's a never-ending petition -- and therefore even
less worth "signing" than the usual round of worthless e-petitions.
To quote from the BreakTheChain link I gave:
====================>8====================
Expiration. Does [the petition] give a timeline for the collection of signatures or a target number of signatures? Unfortunately, most
[email] petitions continue to circulate long after any usefulness they
may have once had has passed.
====================>8====================
And from their page on the Bonsai Kitten petition:
====================>8====================
Any cause can collect enough signatures if it's allowed to go on
indefinitely - that's why most officials pay little attention to
undated ones.
====================>8====================
Not (as I've said) that I've got anything against Dizzy (having never
played the games), it's just that e-petitions are totally not worth
wasting one's time on...
--- Synchronet 3.18b-Win32 NewsLink 1.113