1. Forum
  2. USENET
  3. comp.sys.mac.system

  • Every iPhone below the 15 fails the EU longevity test

    From Andrew@andrew@spam.net to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.system on Saturday, July 13, 2024 18:30:20
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.system

    The fact every iPhone below the iPhone 15 fails the EU longevity test
    before repairs are necessary tells you all you need to know as to why Apple
    has historically used the crappiest cheapest bargain-basement batteries.

    Even the iPhone 16 is rumored to *barely* squeak by in the EU longevity
    test which is Apple's largest crappy battery ever to infest an iPhone.
    <https://9to5mac.com/2024/05/17/iphone-16-battery-density/>
    <https://9to5mac.com/2024/07/12/iphone-16-new-features-worth-the-wait/>

    iPhone batteries failed every test that the EU gave them for longevity.

    And no, a 3% improvement in efficiency does not offset a 100% difference in battery capacity no matter how desperate the math-challenged zealots are.
    --- Synchronet 3.21e-Win32 NewsLink 1.2
  • From Alan@nuh-uh@nope.com to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.system on Saturday, July 13, 2024 11:58:56
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.system

    On 2024-07-13 11:30, Andrew wrote:
    The fact every iPhone below the iPhone 15 fails the EU longevity test

    What is this "longevity test", Arlen?

    Can you point me to a link?

    Because an internet search for "eu battery longevity test" turns up
    nothing I can see that fits.

    before repairs are necessary tells you all you need to know as to why Apple has historically used the crappiest cheapest bargain-basement batteries.

    Even the iPhone 16 is rumored to *barely* squeak by in the EU longevity
    test which is Apple's largest crappy battery ever to infest an iPhone.
    <https://9to5mac.com/2024/05/17/iphone-16-battery-density/>
    <https://9to5mac.com/2024/07/12/iphone-16-new-features-worth-the-wait/>

    Neither of those mentions any such test.


    iPhone batteries failed every test that the EU gave them for longevity.

    Cite, please!


    And no, a 3% improvement in efficiency does not offset a 100% difference in battery capacity no matter how desperate the math-challenged zealots are.

    <https://www.tomsguide.com/us/smartphones-best-battery-life,review-2857.html>

    Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro: 18:48
    OnePlus 12R: 18:42
    Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate: 18:32
    Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra: 17:52
    OnePlus 12: 17:41
    Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra: 16:45
    Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus: 16:32
    Motorola Edge Plus (2023): 15:47
    Moto G Stylus 5G (2024): 15:01
    Nothing Phone 2a: 15:00
    Motorola Razr (2024): 14:37
    Moto G 5G (2024): 14:36
    Nothing Phone 2: 14:21
    iPhone 15 Plus: 14:14
    Motorola Razr Plus (2024): 14:13

    Looks like tom's guide could only fine 13 phones out of the hundreds if
    not thousands out there that have better battery life than the best iPhone.

    Android Authority thinks the iPhone 15 Pro Max comes in third overall:

    <https://www.androidauthority.com/best-android-phone-battery-life-2-755699/>

    And GSM Arena ranks the iPhone first...

    ...albeit as an "Editor's Choice", not purely on numbers:

    <https://www.gsmarena.com/phones_best_battery_life_buyers_guide-review-2028.php>
    --- Synchronet 3.21e-Win32 NewsLink 1.2
  • From Andrew@andrew@spam.net to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.system,comp.mobile.ipad on Monday, July 15, 2024 23:37:59
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.system

    Chris wrote on Mon, 15 Jul 2024 16:48:24 +0100 :

    There isn't one.

    Chris is so far to the left of Mount Stupid, that he thinks he's a genius
    when he's only proving he denies what he's ignorant of but everyone else
    knows all about it - since it has been in the news around the world.
    <https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=15881&group=misc.phone.mobile.iphone#15881>

    These Mount Stupid religious zealots know nothing.
    And deny everything.

    What's no longer shocking is how far to the left of Mount Stupid these uneducated low-IQ ignorant Apple religious fanatical zealots truly are.

    They're so confident in always being so very wrong about everything!

    <https://energy-efficient-products.ec.europa.eu/ecodesign-and-energy-label/product-list/smartphones-and-tablets_en>
    "Ecodesign requirements will apply to mobile phones and tablets
    put on the EU market from 20 June 2025 onwards, including:
    ...
    sufficiently durable batteries which can withstand
    at least 800 charge and discharge cycles
    while retaining at least 80% of their initial capacity
    ...
    --- Synchronet 3.21e-Win32 NewsLink 1.2
  • From Alan@nuh-uh@nope.com to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.system,comp.mobile.ipad on Monday, July 15, 2024 16:41:05
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.system

    On 2024-07-15 16:37, Andrew wrote:
    Chris wrote on Mon, 15 Jul 2024 16:48:24 +0100 :

    There isn't one.

    Chris is so far to the left of Mount Stupid, that he thinks he's a genius when he's only proving he denies what he's ignorant of but everyone else knows all about it - since it has been in the news around the world.
    <https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=15881&group=misc.phone.mobile.iphone#15881>

    You posted that 11 minutes ago...

    ...and it contains no reference to any current EU test for battery
    longevity.


    These Mount Stupid religious zealots know nothing.
    And deny everything.

    What's no longer shocking is how far to the left of Mount Stupid these uneducated low-IQ ignorant Apple religious fanatical zealots truly are.

    They're so confident in always being so very wrong about everything!

    <https://energy-efficient-products.ec.europa.eu/ecodesign-and-energy-label/product-list/smartphones-and-tablets_en>
    "Ecodesign requirements will apply to mobile phones and tablets
    put on the EU market from 20 June 2025 onwards, including:
    ...
    sufficiently durable batteries which can withstand
    at least 800 charge and discharge cycles
    while retaining at least 80% of their initial capacity
    ...

    That's not a test that exists today.

    The fact that you're citing it shows you know you have nothing.
    --- Synchronet 3.21e-Win32 NewsLink 1.2