• 5K Studio Display Alternatives?

    From Matt@matnomail@myemail.invalid to comp.sys.mac.system on Tuesday, December 17, 2024 11:40:30
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.system

    Hi!

    I'm about to order a Mac Mini with an M4-Pro chip, 48 GB of Memory and a 1TB SSD, and I can't find any 5K monitor with a 24 to 27-inch Thunderbolt port to avoid spending the 1,770 euros that the Apple Studio Display costs.

    I have tested and returned the LG 32UN88A-W Ultrafine 32/4K because in
    addition to being too big, it's a million miles from looking like any Apple monitor. And it also only has one USB-C port, which is not the same as a Thunderbolt port.

    A few days ago I also returned an iMac 24 with the M4 chip and a 24-inch 4.5K monitor, which worked very well, but it didn't convince me because it didn't have an HDMI port, and it had Thunderbolt-4 ports, instead of the new Thunderbolt-5 ones.

    Also,I recently sold an iMAC with a 5K display from 2019, and I really miss that quality of monitor.

    Now I have to buy the Apple Display, which seems excessively expensive to me, or another brand that is similar... and if something like that doesn't
    exist... well, I'm thinking of buying a MacBook-Pro with M4, and maybe one day find a decent 5K monitor.

    QUESTIONS:

    1: Has the same thing happened to anyone?

    2: Options, experiences...what would you do in my place?

    Thank you very much in advance!

    MATT.

    NOTE: I live in Spain after more than 30 years in California
    --- Synchronet 3.21e-Win32 NewsLink 1.2
  • From Alan B@user237@newsgrouper.org.uk.invalid to comp.sys.mac.system on Tuesday, December 17, 2024 15:10:25
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.system

    Matt <matnomail@myemail.invalid> posted:

    Hi!

    I'm about to order a Mac Mini with an M4-Pro chip, 48 GB of Memory and a 1TB SSD, and I can't find any 5K monitor with a 24 to 27-inch Thunderbolt port to avoid spending the 1,770 euros that the Apple Studio Display costs.

    I have tested and returned the LG 32UN88A-W Ultrafine 32/4K because in addition to being too big, it's a million miles from looking like any Apple monitor. And it also only has one USB-C port, which is not the same as a Thunderbolt port.

    A few days ago I also returned an iMac 24 with the M4 chip and a 24-inch 4.5K monitor, which worked very well, but it didn't convince me because it didn't have an HDMI port, and it had Thunderbolt-4 ports, instead of the new Thunderbolt-5 ones.

    Also,I recently sold an iMAC with a 5K display from 2019, and I really miss that quality of monitor.

    Now I have to buy the Apple Display, which seems excessively expensive to me, or another brand that is similar... and if something like that doesn't exist... well, I'm thinking of buying a MacBook-Pro with M4, and maybe one day
    find a decent 5K monitor.

    QUESTIONS:

    1: Has the same thing happened to anyone?

    2: Options, experiences...what would you do in my place?

    Thank you very much in advance!

    MATT.

    NOTE: I live in Spain after more than 30 years in California

    See Jaimie's and Theo's follow-ups to your _duplicate_ posting on uk.comp.sys.mac
    --
    Cheers, Alan
    --- Synchronet 3.21e-Win32 NewsLink 1.2
  • From Matt@matnomail@myemail.invalid to comp.sys.mac.system on Tuesday, December 17, 2024 17:17:53
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.system

    On 17 Dec 2024 at 16:10:25 GMT+1, "Alan B"
    <user237@newsgrouper.org.uk.invalid> wrote:

    Matt <matnomail@myemail.invalid> posted:

    Hi!

    I'm about to order a Mac Mini with an M4-Pro chip, 48 GB of Memory and a 1TB >> SSD, and I can't find any 5K monitor with a 24 to 27-inch Thunderbolt port to
    avoid spending the 1,770 euros that the Apple Studio Display costs.

    I have tested and returned the LG 32UN88A-W Ultrafine 32/4K because in
    addition to being too big, it's a million miles from looking like any Apple >> monitor. And it also only has one USB-C port, which is not the same as a
    Thunderbolt port.

    A few days ago I also returned an iMac 24 with the M4 chip and a 24-inch 4.5K
    monitor, which worked very well, but it didn't convince me because it didn't >> have an HDMI port, and it had Thunderbolt-4 ports, instead of the new
    Thunderbolt-5 ones.

    Also,I recently sold an iMAC with a 5K display from 2019, and I really miss >> that quality of monitor.

    Now I have to buy the Apple Display, which seems excessively expensive to me,
    or another brand that is similar... and if something like that doesn't
    exist... well, I'm thinking of buying a MacBook-Pro with M4, and maybe one day
    find a decent 5K monitor.

    QUESTIONS:

    1: Has the same thing happened to anyone?

    2: Options, experiences...what would you do in my place?

    Thank you very much in advance!

    MATT.

    NOTE: I live in Spain after more than 30 years in California

    See Jaimie's and Theo's follow-ups to your _duplicate_ posting on uk.comp.sys.mac

    Thanks Alan!

    Regards,
    Matt.
    --- Synchronet 3.21e-Win32 NewsLink 1.2
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?=@hugybear@gmx.net to comp.sys.mac.system on Tuesday, December 17, 2024 21:36:07
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.system

    On 17.12.24 12:40, Matt wrote:
    And it also only has one USB-C port, which is not the same as a
    Thunderbolt port.

    Thunderbolt is dead as of 31st of December this year.
    --
    "Roma locuta, causa finita." (Augustinus)
    --- Synchronet 3.21e-Win32 NewsLink 1.2
  • From Alan@nuh-uh@nope.com to comp.sys.mac.system on Tuesday, December 17, 2024 12:36:41
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.system

    On 2024-12-17 12:36, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
    On 17.12.24 12:40, Matt wrote:
    And it also only has one USB-C port, which is not the same as a
    Thunderbolt port.

    Thunderbolt is dead as of 31st of December this year.


    No, it is very much not.
    --- Synchronet 3.21e-Win32 NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jolly Roger@jollyroger@pobox.com to comp.sys.mac.system on Tuesday, December 17, 2024 21:40:20
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.system

    On 2024-12-17, Matt <matnomail@myemail.invalid> wrote:
    Hi!

    I'm about to order a Mac Mini with an M4-Pro chip, 48 GB of Memory and a 1TB SSD, and I can't find any 5K monitor with a 24 to 27-inch Thunderbolt port to avoid spending the 1,770 euros that the Apple Studio Display costs.

    I have tested and returned the LG 32UN88A-W Ultrafine 32/4K because in addition to being too big, it's a million miles from looking like any Apple monitor. And it also only has one USB-C port, which is not the same as a Thunderbolt port.

    A few days ago I also returned an iMac 24 with the M4 chip and a 24-inch 4.5K monitor, which worked very well, but it didn't convince me because it didn't have an HDMI port, and it had Thunderbolt-4 ports, instead of the new Thunderbolt-5 ones.

    Also,I recently sold an iMAC with a 5K display from 2019, and I really miss that quality of monitor.

    Now I have to buy the Apple Display, which seems excessively expensive to me, or another brand that is similar... and if something like that doesn't exist... well, I'm thinking of buying a MacBook-Pro with M4, and maybe one day
    find a decent 5K monitor.

    QUESTIONS:

    1: Has the same thing happened to anyone?

    2: Options, experiences...what would you do in my place?

    Thank you very much in advance!

    MATT.

    NOTE: I live in Spain after more than 30 years in California

    I'll just say I use an Apple Studio Display sitting next to an LG
    UltraFine 5K display.

    And I can tell you that the Studio Display blows the LG (and every other mainstream display I've used) out of the water in terms of overall build quality, image quality, color accuracy, backlight consistency, viewing
    angle, audio in and out quality, and camera quality.

    The Studio Display is a pretty stark contrast in overall usability and
    quality compared to most others, and it's worth every penny I paid for
    it.
    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR
    --- Synchronet 3.21e-Win32 NewsLink 1.2
  • From Alan@nuh-uh@nope.com to comp.sys.mac.system on Tuesday, December 17, 2024 14:10:14
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.system

    On 2024-12-17 13:40, Jolly Roger wrote:
    On 2024-12-17, Matt <matnomail@myemail.invalid> wrote:
    Hi!

    I'm about to order a Mac Mini with an M4-Pro chip, 48 GB of Memory and a 1TB >> SSD, and I can't find any 5K monitor with a 24 to 27-inch Thunderbolt port to
    avoid spending the 1,770 euros that the Apple Studio Display costs.

    I have tested and returned the LG 32UN88A-W Ultrafine 32/4K because in
    addition to being too big, it's a million miles from looking like any Apple >> monitor. And it also only has one USB-C port, which is not the same as a
    Thunderbolt port.

    A few days ago I also returned an iMac 24 with the M4 chip and a 24-inch 4.5K
    monitor, which worked very well, but it didn't convince me because it didn't >> have an HDMI port, and it had Thunderbolt-4 ports, instead of the new
    Thunderbolt-5 ones.

    Also,I recently sold an iMAC with a 5K display from 2019, and I really miss >> that quality of monitor.

    Now I have to buy the Apple Display, which seems excessively expensive to me,
    or another brand that is similar... and if something like that doesn't
    exist... well, I'm thinking of buying a MacBook-Pro with M4, and maybe one day
    find a decent 5K monitor.

    QUESTIONS:

    1: Has the same thing happened to anyone?

    2: Options, experiences...what would you do in my place?

    Thank you very much in advance!

    MATT.

    NOTE: I live in Spain after more than 30 years in California

    I'll just say I use an Apple Studio Display sitting next to an LG
    UltraFine 5K display.

    And I can tell you that the Studio Display blows the LG (and every other mainstream display I've used) out of the water in terms of overall build quality, image quality, color accuracy, backlight consistency, viewing
    angle, audio in and out quality, and camera quality.

    The Studio Display is a pretty stark contrast in overall usability and quality compared to most others, and it's worth every penny I paid for
    it.


    It is very expensive, but I recall that reviewers were absolutely blown
    away by its quality.
    --- Synchronet 3.21e-Win32 NewsLink 1.2